China DOS Union

When was the alliance forum established? If I remember correctly, it's almost 5 years old. Should we make some commemorative CDs or articles or something?

Haven't it been that quick? The forum was officially established in October 2002, and it's not yet 4 years.

I agree to make a commemorative CD, make it into an ISO image, and post a BT torrent for everyone to download! There are also many similar ISOs on well-known forums online, which can expand the popularity of this forum! Integrate DOS antivirus software in the CD, put some DOS software, maintenance tools, etc.......

Add another question: How did the forum and the alliance website come into being? It seems that relevant personnel can write an article about it.

Hehe, when it comes to the birth of the forum and the alliance website, it's really worth writing at length about.

We should summarize, and sort out classic software, works, and stories

It's a pity there's no follow-up.

Who will do it is a problem?

Certain pressures and some encouragement measures should be given to all the moderators and enthusiastic people. Generally speaking, the forum lacks a certain incentive measure, so almost every member is lazy!

Before the new DOS era, the most famous DOS networks were Qibu and DOS Home. Before this forum was opened, the new DOS era had also changed several BBSes, and there were message boards too... I vaguely remember: Long after the message board was abandoned, there were still many people posting on it.

Originally posted by Wengier at 2006-5-29 10:39:
Hehe, when it comes to the birth of the forum and the union website, it's really worth writing about in detail.

Want to hear it! I'm eager to know the details.
I especially like to listen to history......

Originally posted by Yulu at 2007-30 08:13 PM:

I want to hear it! Please tell me in detail. :D
I like history the most......

If the main figures at that time, such as Teacher Mo (MYS), also came up to talk about it, that would be great.

The administrator will come first to start, and then relevant personnel will follow. Don't wait for Teacher MYS. He seems to be particularly interested in Linux now and has lost interest in DOS.

When it comes to Linux, in fact, it is mainly character-based interface like DOS (as for X Window, it is equivalent to Windows and not real Linux). I have been in touch with Linux for several years, and I still often contact with it even now, so I should have quite a few experiences. Linux is a kind of Unix-like operating system. Originally a clone of Minix, compared with DOS, although its functions are more powerful (especially in network functions), for general users, its ease of use is very poor, and the operation is very complicated (for example, comparing the EDIT under DOS with the most commonly used VI and other editors under Unix/Linux will show the gap). So I still think that DOS has better ease of use and affinity.