China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --

Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-07-25 14:14
中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS启动盘 & LOGO技术 (启动盘室) » Urgent problem installing the MS-DOS 7.10 full installation edition! View 2,576 Replies 21
Original Poster Posted 2006-05-18 02:52 ·  中国 江西 南昌 电信
新手上路
Credits 18
Posts 9
Joined 2006-05-18 00:31
20-year member
UID 55734
Status Offline
Today I wanted to add a DOS menu to my 2000 system! A friend recommended it,
so I downloaded "MS-DOS 7.10 full installation edition" from Newhua. I finished installing it under DOS (it was all in English, basically I just kept pressing Enter all the way through! Don't laugh!) After entering the system, it said new hardware was found (I guess it was the hard disk, because it modified the MBR or added some LOGO or something). I didn't pay much attention! Later, because I needed to use BT, I used GHOST to restore an earlier ghost backup! But even after restoring the earlier XP ghost, the first time entering the system it still reported new hardware found, and it had to restart before it could run normally!!! I'm dizzy! I guess this "MS-DOS 7.10 full installation edition" changed something in the hard disk boot area and left it in the hard disk partition table! It didn't get restored, right! I restored several earlier ghost backups in a row, all of them were ones that had been working normally before, and now they all say new hardware found. Also, SkyNet firewall reports: unable to open driver, restart required for normal operation. Although after restarting I haven't noticed anything unusual, the hardware got changed for no reason. If anyone has a way to restore it I'd be very grateful!!!
Oh right, I also used FIXMBR in the Win2000 Recovery Console. At that time it reported: illegal MBR information. I ran FIXMBR, but after restoring the earlier GHOST it still reported: new hardware found. This is killing me!!!
Floor 2 Posted 2006-05-18 03:55 ·  加拿大 Bell
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
When DOS was installing and asked whether to rewrite the MBR, you chose "Yes," right? But usually it still shouldn't end up like this.
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 3 Posted 2006-05-18 04:35 ·  中国 江西 南昌 电信
新手上路
Credits 18
Posts 9
Joined 2006-05-18 00:31
20-year member
UID 55734
Status Offline
Ah yes, that's right, you've finally come. I've been waiting here for you all this time! It's almost dawn! Is there any way to restore it? Thanks.
Floor 4 Posted 2006-05-18 04:44 ·  中国 江西 南昌 电信
新手上路
Credits 18
Posts 9
Joined 2006-05-18 00:31
20-year member
UID 55734
Status Offline
Do I have to use fdisk to restore it? My hard disk is 160GB! There's more than 100GB of data in it!!
Floor 5 Posted 2006-05-18 04:56 ·  中国 江西 南昌 电信
新手上路
Credits 18
Posts 9
Joined 2006-05-18 00:31
20-year member
UID 55734
Status Offline
I just tried FDISK /MBR, still no good. What exactly do I have to do to restore the old MBR?!
Floor 6 Posted 2006-05-18 05:01 ·  中国 江西 南昌 电信
新手上路
Credits 18
Posts 9
Joined 2006-05-18 00:31
20-year member
UID 55734
Status Offline
A net friend on QQ just said: delete the C drive partition, then recreate the C drive partition.
That way the mbr will be gone, reinstall windows, done.

But would that make the data in the other logical partitions get lost?
Floor 7 Posted 2006-05-18 07:44 ·  中国 广东 广州 教育网
铂金会员
★★★★
C++启程者
Credits 5,154
Posts 1,827
Joined 2003-07-18 00:00
23-year member
UID 7105
Gender Male
Status Offline
Could it be that the source code for rewriting the MBR in MSDOS71 causes incompatibility with hard disks over 160GB?
My 20 and 80GB drives both have no problem...
Floor 8 Posted 2006-05-18 14:47 ·  中国 江西 南昌 电信
新手上路
Credits 18
Posts 9
Joined 2006-05-18 00:31
20-year member
UID 55734
Status Offline
Wengier
Administrator:
I've seen you online all day, are you really too lazy to answer my question at all? Nobody is perfect! Even if you really don't know the solution, we wouldn't say anything! Or do you know and simply can't be bothered with people like us!
The forum slogan says it well: .........let us create and develop together a beautiful world of freedom and GNU GPL!
Do you know how much fear and panic I went through during this whole day? Because I had no experience! And without your hints, I could only restore the MBR on my own based on some net friends' suggestions! The worst time was when I used SuperFdisk and erased the entire MBR! This software didn't give an obvious enough warning or backup before erasing! As a result the entire hard disk was paralyzed!
In the end, a kind nearby net friend took a taxi over and brought Jiangmin, and only after more than 2 hours was it finally restored!
And I listened to a friend's recommendation! Downloaded software from your place! Ran into a little doubt! To you it may be nothing at all! And you just brush past it! Tell me! Are you some great expert so you're amazing? Were you born an expert? Weren't you ever as clueless as me??????????????????????????????
Floor 9 Posted 2006-05-24 00:58 ·  中国 湖南 常德 电信
银牌会员
★★★
Credits 1,384
Posts 709
Joined 2005-10-29 22:22
20-year member
UID 44271
Status Offline
Don't get excited, it's not that nobody wanted to answer, it's that your problem is a bit strange.
Reasonably speaking, ghost is very overbearing: once restored, there shouldn't be anything that won't boot. Later you also used fdisk/mbr repairs and so on... maybe reply #7 was right, since it's 160G, the hard disk parameters can't be modified with fdisk. Because even windowxp didn't support 160G, only later with sp2, so maybe fdisk won't work.
A suggestion was made; actually your problem didn't need to be such a hassle (I didn't see it earlier, maybe I'm a bit late). If you run into this again in the future, since you have ghost anyway, you can simply reinstall winXP and restore the partitions. Then ghost it again, maybe that will work.
Floor 10 Posted 2006-05-24 08:22 ·  中国 四川 南充 电信
超级版主
★★★★
我爱DOS
Credits 5,310
Posts 2,044
Joined 2005-09-26 12:00
20-year member
UID 42843
Gender Male
From 四川南充
Status Offline
Floor 11 Posted 2006-05-24 08:22 ·  中国 四川 南充 电信
超级版主
★★★★
我爱DOS
Credits 5,310
Posts 2,044
Joined 2005-09-26 12:00
20-year member
UID 42843
Gender Male
From 四川南充
Status Offline
Floor 12 Posted 2006-05-24 11:29 ·  中国 河南 洛阳 涧西区 联通
银牌会员
★★★
Credits 1,455
Posts 712
Joined 2006-01-20 10:26
20-year member
UID 49246
Status Offline
Hehe, experts above (posts #9-#12), I guess you may have misunderstood the OP's description a bit, and what you're guessing all sounds too serious.
I'm going to eat now, I'll continue explaining this afternoon.
Floor 13 Posted 2006-05-24 18:17 ·  中国 上海 松江区 电信
铂金会员
★★★★
DOS一根葱
Credits 5,493
Posts 2,315
Joined 2006-05-01 10:41
20-year member
UID 54766
Gender Male
From 上海
Status Offline
First of all, my sympathies to the OP for what happened.
On the other hand, think of it as a lesson. For people not familiar with the DOS system, entering the DOS system always carries a certain risk. I don't know about others, but I myself gradually became a DOS newbie bug through taking risks.

Actually you can use Diskgen (Diskman) to restore the MBR or the partition table.
Floor 14 Posted 2006-05-25 09:20 ·  中国 江西 南昌 电信
新手上路
Credits 18
Posts 9
Joined 2006-05-18 00:31
20-year member
UID 55734
Status Offline
Indeed. To be honest, after all it's not some malicious software, so the consequences really aren't anything serious. In any case it has no effect on the machine or system! Basically you can say there's no hindrance at all! There are still many programs now that write the MBR, for example some newer operating systems or even certain versions of the early One-Key Restore Wizard, and so on are all like this! In fact, installing MSdos7.10 did no damage to your machine either, it only changed the MBR a bit. I'm just unusually fussy about this issue, I care about boot speed and can't stand that restoring an old GHOST always reports new hardware, that's all! I have to make that clear!
The symptom is very simple: I mentioned it at the beginning! It's just that the first time entering the system it reports new hardware found and forces a restart. It's not like when you plug in a new hard disk, where it also reports new hardware found but doesn't require a restart! Secondly there's the boot speed issue, but only people like me who are obsessed with speed can clearly feel it. For ordinary people whose progress bar only scrolls 1-2 times, they won't notice at all!
After experimenting these past few days, I got 6 hard disks to play with, and treated it as learning some new things too. In the end I found a way to restore it. DOS old hands needn't read this; actually it's just a simple restoration of boot information:
First back up the hard disk data, then use diskgen to delete all partitions. Before exiting remember to press F8; it will prompt that it found a previous boot record. Delete it, then repartition. Now with the CD-ROM connected, my hard disk enters XP when the scrolling bar has only just appeared!

Summary:
Through this incident, my friends around me and I got the biggest benefit of all: be sure to make a backup of your hard disk boot sector and partition table. It only takes a few seconds, but at a critical moment it can save your hard disk! Save your data! Remember this!! Remember this!!!

[ Last edited by dsjnc on 2006-5-24 at 13:23 ]
Floor 15 Posted 2006-05-25 10:52 ·  中国 四川 南充 电信
超级版主
★★★★
我爱DOS
Credits 5,310
Posts 2,044
Joined 2005-09-26 12:00
20-year member
UID 42843
Gender Male
From 四川南充
Status Offline
Generally speaking, after the partitions on a hard disk have changed, WINDOWS will detect new hardware when it starts up. But if only the MBR was changed, it should not detect new hardware!
Forum Jump: