![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-09-06 07:09 |
47,812 topics / 349,914 posts / today 0 new / 48,268 members |
| DOS启动盘 & LOGO技术 (启动盘室) » Why doesn't the format in msdos710 work properly for me? |
| Printable Version 3,467 / 16 |
| Floor1 phantom | Posted 2003-04-27 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 25 Credits 179 | |
|
My disk was previously partitioned with 98se's fdisk, and of course also formatted with 98se's format. Lately the machine has been hanging frequently, and I'm still looking for the cause. To reinstall the system, I booted with wengier's boot disk and did format c, then installed windows2000 on the hard disk. It said it couldn't find some kind of information; I didn't understand it clearly. I've never run into that before. During format it reported the hard disk as about 5G, but dir showed about 4G. Don't know why, so I had to boot with a 98se disk and reformat. Then both the display and dir showed 5G, and 2000 could also be installed.
Could it be that wengier's format is incompatible with 98se's fdisk? Or did I do something wrong in the process? |
|
| Floor2 如是大师 | Posted 2003-04-27 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 3,351 Credits 9,654 From 湖北 | |
|
I haven't used format now either, but the format in wengier's msdos71 boot disk seems to be FreeDOS's.
|
|
| Floor3 Wengier | Posted 2003-04-27 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
No, the FORMAT in the MS-DOS 7.10 boot disk I made is exactly the MS one (from 98SE), untouched. And I've used my MS-DOS 7.10 boot disk to install Win2K on a classmate's computer without any problem at all.
|
|
| Floor4 ko20010214 | Posted 2003-04-27 00:00 |
| 版主 Posts 1,628 Credits 7,296 | |
|
Those fdisk and format in wengier's disk are genuine MS stuff. They haven't been modified. I'd also like to replace them with third-party software, but wengier still kept them. Still, in a short time it's hard to find tools with better compatibility, expanded functions, and small size too.
|
|
| Floor5 MYS | Posted 2003-04-28 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 1,637 Credits 5,170 From 广东佛山 | |
|
For xCOPY and HIMEM I would choose third-party software.
|
|
| Floor6 Lydong | Posted 2003-04-28 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 407 Credits 1,468 From 广州 | |
|
The third-party software in my boot disk that I use to replace MS-DOS built-in commands includes XCOPY、ATTRIB、DOSKEY、SPFDISK、DELTREE、DOSVER、CCD、XDEL 、XMSDSK, etc. They are all much easier to use functionally than the ones built into MS-DOS. For the others I only keep external commands such as FORMAT、SCANDISK、MEM, and SYS.
|
|
| Floor7 Wengier | Posted 2003-04-28 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Also SUBST, SORT, and so on, right! My boot disk now has both Free FDISK and SPFDISK.
|
|
| Floor8 phantom | Posted 2003-04-28 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 25 Credits 179 | |
|
I formatted it twice, and both times the displayed result and the dir result were inconsistent. After booting with the pwin98se boot disk, I found there was a file there (forgot the name). Maybe my crappy motherboard (the name on the motherboard box doesn't even match the manual, and the manufacturer can't be found online) is incompatible with some program loaded by wengier's disk, causing even format to behave abnormally.
|
|
| Floor9 Roy | Posted 2003-04-28 00:00 |
| 管理员 Posts 1,633 Credits 4,869 | |
|
MS's subst is too big!!
I replaced it with subst from PTS-DOS 2000 |
|
| Floor10 Wengier | Posted 2003-04-28 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Right, the SUBST, SORT, and FIND commands in my MS-DOS 7.10 boot disk were all taken from PTS-DOS.
|
|
| Floor11 如是大师 | Posted 2003-04-28 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 3,351 Credits 9,654 From 湖北 | |
|
Yeah, the original one in 981 is no longer practical. There is one in xp, but unfortunately it seems it can't be used under dos71. Anyone interested can give it a try.
|
|
| Floor12 phantom | Posted 2003-04-29 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 25 Credits 179 | |
|
Today I finally figured out the reason why the machine was hanging so often. That crappy box of mine can't properly coordinate two memory sticks, one pc133 and one pc100. No choice, had to remove one of them.
I checked, and format really has no problem. That makes it even more confusing, and I don't want to dig into it anymore. In the April 20 version of msd710, I saw this in autoexec.bat: LH CTMOUSE LH CTMOUSE>NUL A typo by wengier, right? It won't cause an error, but obviously it's... |
|
| Floor13 Wengier | Posted 2003-04-29 00:00 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
The following is quoted from phantom at 2003-4-29 23:36:59: That wasn't my typo! I deliberately made it like that after researching it. Because CuteMouse seems to have a BUG in batch files on a very small number of systems when loading a COM mouse: the first time it can't load correctly, and only the second time works, so I configured it this way. |
|
| Floor14 如是大师 | Posted 2003-04-29 00:00 |
| 元老会员 Posts 3,351 Credits 9,654 From 湖北 | |
|
Looks like there's no fault to find with wengier after all.
|
|
| Floor15 phantom | Posted 2003-04-30 00:00 |
| 初级用户 Posts 25 Credits 179 | |
|
Yeah, judging purely from those two commands, they are repeated; the only difference is that the latter doesn't display the process.
wengier can simply be described as obsessively dedicated. |
|
| 1 2 Next |
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |