![]() |
China DOS Union-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum |
| Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union |
|
中国DOS联盟论坛 The time now is 2026-08-18 02:13 |
47,814 topics / 349,907 posts / today 4 new / 48,259 members |
| DOS疑难解答 & 问题讨论 (解答室) » [Closed] How to Improve DOS Disk Performance (Speed Up File Copying, Compression and Decompression Speed) |
| Printable Version 2,573 / 16 |
| Floor1 shella | Posted 2006-04-09 17:28 |
| 初级用户 Posts 31 Credits 187 | |
|
rt
The advantage of DOS lies in disk management, but at least the file copying speed I use in DOS is not as fast as Windows 5 times slower than Windows Copying a file takes 2 minutes in Windows and 10 minutes in DOS Except for ghost Are there any tips to speed it up? Experts, please give some advice I have already loaded smartdrv [ Last edited by shella on 2006-4-10 at 21:05 ] |
|
| Floor2 dato | Posted 2006-04-10 00:32 |
| 高级用户 Posts 377 Credits 916 | |
Originally posted by shella at 2006-4-9 05:28 PM: Previously, it was XDMA, now it's QDMA. Enabling the hard disk's DMA mode, the speed is good http://johnson.tmfc.net/freedos/qdma.html |
|
| Floor3 shella | Posted 2006-04-10 00:43 |
| 初级用户 Posts 31 Credits 187 | |
|
Thanks, is there a simple introduction on how to use it and the parameter descriptions? Those are all in English, can't understand. I followed the instructions to set up:
DEVICE=QDBOOT.SYS DEVICE=UMBPCI.SYS I=CC00-EFFF NOEMS DEVICEHIGH=/L:1 QDMA.SYS /O /D /F /L It doesn't work. It shows: QDBOOT V1.0... UltraDMA controller... Primary-master disk is ST380011A. Then it freezes. [ Last edited by shella on 2006-4-10 at 01:59 ] |
|
| Floor4 Wengier | Posted 2006-04-10 03:05 |
| 系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736 | |
|
Just add this line:
DEVICEHIGH=QDMA.SYS Additionally, you can load SMARTDRV to further improve disk speed. |
|
| Floor5 xuantian | Posted 2006-04-10 04:44 |
| 高级用户 Posts 282 Credits 587 | |
|
The key is to load SMARTDRV
|
|
| Floor6 shella | Posted 2006-04-10 07:07 |
| 初级用户 Posts 31 Credits 187 | |
Originally posted by Wengier at 2006-4-10 03:05 AM: It works! It can already reach 1/2 the speed of Windows. I tried again DEVICEHIGH=LOWDMA.SYS DEVICEHIGH=UDMA.SYS It seems a bit faster than QDMA.SYS [ Last edited by shella on 2006-4-10 at 07:15 ] |
|
| Floor7 DOSforever | Posted 2006-04-10 10:39 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 2,239 Credits 4,639 | |
Originally posted by dato at 2006-4-10 00:32: Have you compared which is better between QDMA and UDMA? Refer to: XDMA vs. UDMA |
|
| Floor8 shella | Posted 2006-04-10 11:09 |
| 初级用户 Posts 31 Credits 187 | |
Originally posted by DOSforever at 2006-4-10 10:39 AM: Where can I download NCache2? How to use it? Is it faster than smartdrv? |
|
| Floor9 DOSforever | Posted 2006-04-10 11:31 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 2,239 Credits 4,639 | |
|
NCache2 is in NU, but NCache2 needs to recognize the DOS version number. The NCache2 in NU 8.0 can only be used in MS-DOS 6.22.
|
|
| Floor10 shella | Posted 2006-04-10 14:59 |
| 初级用户 Posts 31 Credits 187 | |
|
It seems that only using UDMA + SMARTDRV. His disk performance is already very high, but there is still a gap with Windows.
The last question: Without considering other factors of the driver (memory usage, DOS version number, etc.), can the disk performance of DOS reach the level of Windows? How to set it? |
|
| Floor11 DOSforever | Posted 2006-04-10 16:58 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 2,239 Credits 4,639 | |
|
PC-Cache is also better than Smartdrv
The second question I think it can't be achieved |
|
| Floor12 wl00560 | Posted 2006-04-10 17:04 |
| 银牌会员 Posts 709 Credits 1,384 | |
|
Ask, can this software speed up the speed of ghost?
|
|
| Floor13 zjnbwdj | Posted 2006-04-10 20:01 |
| 中级用户 Posts 137 Credits 300 | |
|
The speed of copying files? Compared with WINDOWS? When DOS's memory management can be as good as WINDOWS, then we can compare again.
|
|
| Floor14 shella | Posted 2006-04-10 21:04 |
| 初级用户 Posts 31 Credits 187 | |
|
What the person above said is also correct. Well, this matter is like this.
|
|
| Floor15 DOSforever | Posted 2006-04-10 23:18 |
| 金牌会员 Posts 2,239 Credits 4,639 | |
Originally posted by wl00560 at 2006-4-10 17:04: Ghost has its own disk reading and writing method, and the disk buffer software we usually use seems to be ineffective for it. I also want to post a special thread to discuss the disk access method of Ghost. |
|
| 1 2 Next |
|
[ Contact the Union admin team -
中国DOS联盟 -
Standard version ] Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023 |