Haha, I'm very glad that finally someone has started researching this problem. I also posted such a thread a year and a half ago.
{13428}
Does the "Refresh" on the desktop have an effect on the system?
Regarding the issue of desktop refresh, I think refresh is only useful when the icons are chaotic, or there are strange dots or lines on the desktop, or "color blocks" left by applications. I once tried on a machine with WinXP system, using an old Trident 9750 PCI graphics card (with only 2M video memory! -_-|||), and after entering the XP system, the desktop often had inexplicable strange dots and lines, and pressing "Refresh" would immediately disappear. So this "Refresh" is just simply refreshing the desktop, and it has no effect on clearing the system's "memory garbage" at all.
Now there are all kinds of specialized optimization and memory organizing software on major download sites, both designed by domestic and foreign personnel. If the refresh of Windows could really organize memory, then the designers and engineers of optimization and memory organizing software wouldn't need to spend so much thought and effort to develop them!
Think again, do DOS and Win 3.x have "refresh"? Rarely! I've only seen at most an item "Refresh Display" in the menus of some DOS applications (like Turbo C, Dos Navigator), and its function is just to refresh the screen when the screen is chaotic or abnormal and restore the original appearance.
Starting from Win95, the desktop concept and functions of Windows are enhanced compared to Win3.x, and the "Refresh" item begins to be added to the right-click menu. In systems like Win95, 98, ME, 2000, the "Refresh" item is in the middle position of the right-click menu, while in WinXP, "Refresh" suddenly jumps to the second position in the menu. It seems that this "Refresh" is increasingly favored. This may be that Windows programmers think from the needs of users, in order to have more new experiences ("eXPerience"

in the XP version. Novices see that "old birds" like to refresh, so they blindly imitate, thinking this is the "old bird's" unique skill, so it spreads from person to person. With the promotion of the XP system, more and more people start to develop the bad habit of refreshing.
In conclusion, I firmly think that the idea that "Refresh" can clear and organize memory is simply a fallacy! Refreshing the desktop several times after returning to the desktop each time is purely unnecessary and boring small actions!
I can also be considered an old bird. I've been in contact with computers for nearly ten years, and I never "refresh"! And every time I see others having the habit of refreshing the desktop, I always feel displeased. In my own computer, I used Resource Hacker to modify one of the core files of the system: SHELL32.DLL, and deleted the "Refresh" in the right-click menu, thereby fundamentally cutting off the use of mouse to refresh (attached picture). Every time my friends come to use my computer, they always wonder: Where is your "Refresh"? Then I always secretly laugh in my heart, and then persuade him not to refresh. If really need to refresh, just press the F5 key

. Also, the right-click menu after deleting "Refresh" becomes very short, super cool!
The above is my personal view, maybe I spoke a bit excessively, please forgive everyone!
[
Last edited by JonePeng on 2005-12-4 at 22:00 ]