China DOS Union

Thanks to the moderator willsort!!!
Why are the fonts so small and hard to read...
Suggest to pin it.

Re JonePeng:

I have already stated in the index explanation that "as this article is updated and expanded, it will be pinned level by level". Now this is just an initial template, and there are still many details to discuss and modify before a large - scale update. For example, the classification and sorting method adopted by the index still need to be tested through discussion and practice for a period of time.

I used the forum's No. 1 Song typeface. If it is larger, some lines will exceed; also, larger text will have burrs on my LCD screen.

Hehe, didn't expect that "Xiaotian" is still using a liquid crystal display, not bad! But since it's for everyone to see, we can't just take your monitor as the standard.

Also, praise you a bit, you've really worked hard on the organization!

Not bad, not bad. It's just that the font is too small, almost unreadable.

Copy it and open it in Word

The moderator has worked hard. Why isn't it stickied?

Re All:

The index has been updated to 300. The progress is quite slow. There's no way around it. I don't have much free time, and I also need to pay attention to and respond to valuable new questions.

Other updates include some revisions to the index description text. At the same time, the restrictions on font and font size have been removed. Now it should display the default style under the joint action of the forum and IE. But on my screen, there's no change in display.

The top-sticked issues, as I mentioned on the 3rd floor, there are still many issues that need to be corrected. For example, whether to add a link to the author's information on the forum under the author's name. This is a technically more challenging issue and will need to be carefully argued before an answer can be reached.

[ Last edited by willsort on 2005-10-25 at 23:35 ]

Re All:

The index has been updated to 400.

Change "solved thread" in the topic title to "solved topic", and consider whether to change the word "index" to "table of contents". Let's discuss it. According to the habit of physical books, "index" is generally at the end of the book, the object is the key words in the book, and the sorting method is generally alphabetical and phonetic order. While "table of contents" is generally at the front of the book, the object is the chapter titles in the book, and the sorting method is generally the page number order in the text. And this text seems closer to "table of contents" but not quite. Does anyone have any other suggestions?

Some additions, deletions and modifications have been made to the classification of topics. At the same time, considering the reading convenience in plain text mode, "=" is added before and after the classification for prominent identification.

The forum links of the authors. Because all author links in the forum appear in the form of user IDs, a user ID table is needed for conversion, which is relatively troublesome, and finally it is abandoned.

Great stuff! Strongly request to be pinned!

Very good, very powerful!