China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --

Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!

中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-06-24 08:35
中国DOS联盟论坛 » 站务公告 & 版主讨论 » Forum error list!!! Looking forward to the administrators' visit and guidance!!! View 2,720 Replies 6
Original Poster Posted 2005-07-17 05:50 ·  中国 黑龙江 哈尔滨 联通
初级用户
Credits 143
Posts 7
Joined 2003-09-04 00:00
22-year member
UID 9459
Gender Male
Status Offline
First of all, thank you to the administrator autoit for helping me solve my ID password issue.

Let's start with some preambles. Oh, sigh, it's still comfortable to use my own name...

Let's talk a bit more about this Discuz! 2.5. Originally, when I wrote that post before, I really hoped to use VBB. Although I haven't been in contact with Discuz! that much, I have some understanding of it. Although I personally think it will never compare to VBB.

But the nobility of VBB is not only reflected in the service fee,
reflected in the system resource consumption after all functions are enabled,
and the large database, etc....

The cost is really a bit too high... dry laugh

Next, I would like to report to the leaders of the forum, colleagues, viewers, lurkers, and visitors about the gains from browsing the forum in the past day (forum errors)


First, point out the mistakes of the administrators who made this forum. This mistake is

<MARQUEE behavior=alternate height=18 scrollDelay=100 style="HEIGHT: 18px; WIDTH: 60%;" border="0"><font color="000080">-- 聯合DOS 推動DOS 發展DOS --</font></MARQUEE>

This line of code is very inconspicuous. I think everyone can see it swaying at the top of the forum. Yes, it is this one. It means that this website can only be browsed with IE. Although most other browsers can at least support it in a way that simulates IE6, its existence can tell everyone that this forum is not standard, or that when accessing with IE, it is the effect the author wants. Although IE has proposed to make the next generation of WEB code, before that, IE has said that IE7 will support the standard W3C. So, try to keep the forum in its original standard that complies with W3C as much as possible.



At the bottom of all forum sections, the content of the quick new topic block is completely left-aligned. This may not be noticeable to people using 800 resolution, but the larger the resolution, the more terrifying it is. For example, the resolution of my current monitor is 1600, and that quick new topic line is entirely on the left of the forum, leaving a position of the forum on the right


Title: Very sorry to trouble the administrator..
Title: Set the date in the computer..
Title: Is there a Wubi input method..
Title: ▲▲ Look at my..

Looking like this, I think it can already reflect the problem. Each ending is almost the same. Originally, the Discuz! program is made for ordinary local encodings. Most of the text encodings of their own countries in the world are mostly no more than 2 bytes, and UTF-8 is not. So when the program shortens the text, there will be a situation where it doesn't break words, so this ending form appears... It seems that Discuz! has no good way to solve it so far. The administrator can check on the official side, maybe there will be gains. If not, you can adjust the number of shortened characters so that most of them don't appear like this.



Next is that ever-unchanging LOGO. I don't quite understand. Maybe it has other meanings, but I think most people see is a LOGO that has been hanging in the upper left corner of the forum, with extremely low quality, and the characters are crooked. The LOGO is the smallest and most delicate unit in a WEB that can reflect the beauty of the entire WEB, but here...



The next problem is, why after all the content, forum template, language, all content are converted to Simplified Chinese, the forum section names are still Traditional Chinese, or Traditional Chinese or Simplified Chinese, only the section names are Traditional Chinese. It feels strange.



Another point is a reference opinion. Why do the administrators still hang their own names on the sections? I think it's the same to hang or not to hang. The administrators who manage the overall situation, there is no need to hang the name on the sub-sections. There are too many names on the sections here. Too many moderators also lead to no new people daring to come out and say that they want to try to be a moderator.



Another point is whether the forum should make the forum's skin by itself or find someone to do it. The skin is nothing. It can be accessed normally with or without it, but it still represents the image here to some extent. Everyone is the default Discuz!, which is boring.



In addition, http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/home.php, that is, the place where the homepage is temporarily directly redirected, the table is seriously misaligned.


That's all the nonsense I can think of for now. Please give some opinions after the administrators read it. If no one replies after I write it for half an hour, I will cry...
Floor 2 Posted 2005-07-17 12:02 ·  中国 福建 厦门 电信
系统支持
★★★
Credits 904
Posts 339
Joined 2002-10-10 00:00
23-year member
UID 1904
From 厦门
Status Offline
Wengier insists on the previous logo... The parts of the Banner that I modified on Wengier's side have also been removed
I'll make a Banner when I go to work tomorrow.. The problem with MARQUEE will not exist.

I didn't see Discuz! with UTF-8. This is what I randomly changed myself, including converting the content of the library to UTF-8... So it also caused some problems: the hyphenation problem mentioned above; the user names that were irregular might now become garbled... But I browsed the member list. A large part of them just registered and didn't participate in anything + haven't been here for a long time... Consider adding an automatic member deletion thing in the future, of course, with an appropriate time relaxation!

The quick post can be modified in time...

Why after converting all content, forum templates, language systems, and all content to Simplified Chinese, the forum section names are still in Traditional Chinese, or some are Traditional and some are Simplified, only the section names are in Traditional Chinese, it feels very strange
It was like this before. It wasn't changed during this conversion...

Let me say an external reference opinion, that is, why do all administrators still hang their own names on the sections? I think whether it is hung or not, it's the same for the administrators who manage the overall situation. There's no need to hang the name on the sub-sections. There are too many names on the sections here. Too many moderators also lead to no new people daring to come forward and say they want to try to be a moderator
Originally, the forum Admin used to be "Sui Feng Shun", and the others were moderators, etc. And now the forum data volume is large and has been placed here all the time, so I became the Admin. And Wengier was given Admin privileges after I converted the forum the day before yesterday, just to better manage the forum...

You wrote at 05:50 that you would reply in half an hour, aren't you afraid that "the ghost is coming oh..."
Floor 3 Posted 2005-07-17 12:06 ·  中国 福建 厦门 电信
系统支持
★★★
Credits 904
Posts 339
Joined 2002-10-10 00:00
23-year member
UID 1904
From 厦门
Status Offline
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/home.php

Unexpectedly needed... I forgot to remove it...
Floor 4 Posted 2005-07-18 12:16 ·  加拿大 Bell
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
I am currently "persisting" in using the previous LOGO mainly to make everyone feel familiar when seeing the converted new forum, for fear that some people might think it is no longer the original DOS forum. Of course, after a few days when everyone is familiar with the environment, we can switch to the new forum LOGO.

AutoIt putting those words in the login place is also not bad.

Regarding the issue of traditional and simplified Chinese, in fact, this site is a Chinese website, not a special simplified Chinese site or traditional Chinese site. I quite appreciate the free atmosphere of Wiki, where participants come from all over the world and write in their favorite ways, and the coexistence of traditional and simplified characters should not be a problem at all, and it can also greatly enhance everyone's communication.

In addition, heh heh, "within half an hour" is also too...
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 5 Posted 2005-07-18 12:23 ·  中国 上海 徐汇区 电信
银牌会员
★★★
永遠的DOS~~~
Credits 1,200
Posts 466
Joined 2005-02-01 00:00
21-year member
UID 35867
Gender Male
From 上海
Status Offline
If it is possible, I suggest adding a simplified to traditional Chinese conversion function to the forum.
32位才是DOS未来的希望
个人网志:http://sololand.moe
Floor 6 Posted 2005-07-18 12:37 ·  加拿大 Bell
系统支持
★★★★★★
“新DOS时代”站长
Credits 27,736
Posts 10,521
Joined 2002-10-09 12:00
23-year member
UID 9
Status Offline
If the simplified - traditional Chinese conversion function really exists, it would be good, but it's恐怕... (Note: The original Chinese has an incomplete part "不過要真正實現起來恐怕...", and the translation here is a rough attempt based on the content. The "恐怕..." part is kept as is since it's not fully translated in the original and it's hard to completely translate without more context. So the overall translated text is "If the simplified - traditional Chinese conversion function really exists, it would be good, but it's恐怕...")
Wengier - 新DOS时代

欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/

E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)

Floor 7 Posted 2005-07-23 11:10 ·  中国 北京 海淀区 联通
中级用户
Credits 211
Posts 39
Joined 2003-06-25 00:00
22-year member
UID 5859
Gender Male
Status Offline
I discarded DVBBS and switched to a PHP forum, which is better than anything else!!! This was my suggestion a year ago. Now it's finally implemented, and there are no major issues with data conversion, which is really good! The administrator also accepted my other suggestion: reducing the height of the advertisement at the top, which is also very good.
Forum Jump: