中国DOS联盟论坛

China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union
中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-08-24 18:01
47,812 topics / 349,910 posts / today 1 new / 48,262 members
站务公告 & 版主讨论 » Important notice: Forum merger issue
Printable Version  5,414 / 19
Floor1 Wengier Posted 2003-03-11 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
Now the DanDiao Forum has done a pre-conversion of the Discuz! Forum, so everyone is using the Discuz! Forum now. The following is the converted effect of the DanDiao Forum (note: only a test page). Let's see how it is:

http://www.tianao.org/copy114/bbs1/
Floor2 Wengier Posted 2003-03-11 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
The reason why the forum merger issue is mentioned mainly has three reasons:

1: Popularity reason: Since the website was deleted, the popularity has decreased a lot, and after merging, the human resources will increase;
2: Forum stability reason: This forum often has the phenomenon of being unable to enter, and sometimes it can't be entered for a long time;
3: Development reason: After merging, the original two forums can benefit each other and develop for the common goal.

Today I discussed with the moderator of the Single Draw Forum for a long time, and converted the Single Draw Forum into a Discuz! forum, so it is the same as our forum. He reorganized the sections, made DOS into a section in the forum, and the status is completely equal to other sections. Everyone can see in the above forum test page, what do you think? In addition, for the benefit of everyone, I proposed to make DOS a separate major category, with two DOS sections inside, what is everyone's opinion?

Note: Time is very urgent, welcome everyone to quickly put forward your opinions, thank you!
Floor3 MYS Posted 2003-03-11 00:00
元老会员 Posts 1,637 Credits 5,170 From 广东佛山
I have no objection to merging the two forums. However, I think the key to popularity is that there must be abundant resources to attract more people. Simply merging the forums can only temporarily gather people together, and in the end, it may not be very useful. At present, both forums are very deserted, and in addition, there are some cross users. After merging, there will not be much promotion in terms of popularity and other aspects.

For the single fishing forum, I think the local color is too strong. The forum owner speaks a lot with a Guangdong accent. I believe some people will not like it, which is probably one of the reasons why it can't get hot.

Floor4 Wengier Posted 2003-03-11 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
The 12th article in the "Dan Diao Forum Regulations" I just drafted clearly states: "When posting, please use standard language, and should express in Mandarin Chinese. Except when it is really necessary, do not include other languages/dialects in the post, including Cantonese, French, Russian, etc." After it is announced then using Cantonese will not be allowed.
Floor5 copy114 Posted 2003-03-11 00:00
初级用户 Posts 37 Credits 229
I can guarantee this. Although most of the forum owners of our original forum are from Guangdong, you can take a look at the CD-ROM forum and the printer forum. They also speak Mandarin, and there are quite a few people. The main reason for our merger is that everyone has a comprehensive place to study. In the forum, you can not only learn things but also exchange experiences. Isn't this very good? In fact, the biggest purpose of the merger for me is to adapt to everyone, and it has nothing to do with my personal interests at all. Please understand. The space I rent costs 4,000 yuan a year. Putting up a forum and not charging mainly for what? It's for learning.
Floor6 Wengier Posted 2003-03-11 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
Let me introduce to everyone that the above copy114 is the forum administrator of the single-fishing forum.
Floor7 playboy2925 Posted 2003-03-11 00:00
银牌会员 Posts 393 Credits 1,275
Is it useful?
Floor8 happy Posted 2003-03-13 00:00
中级用户 Posts 72 Credits 349
That forum is generally okay, but there's one thing I don't like: hiding some things that seem useful, and it's not just one layer. For example, "You need to reply to see," and then after you reply, it says "You must post 20 times to see." It's really annoying. Such forced posting can only increase useless posts and make everyone spend a long time not finding some useful things, which will naturally affect the popularity of the forum. This is the reason I don't approve of the merger. This is also the reason I like this DOS forum.
Floor9 copy114 Posted 2003-03-13 00:00
初级用户 Posts 37 Credits 229
Actually, I don't have to make you merge. Of course, if you don't like merging, I don't want to force you. If it's really forced, then merging would be boring. At first, I told the forum administrator of this forum that this forum often can't be accessed, so many people have lost confidence. It's better for the two forums to merge, so that stability can be achieved, and on the other hand, the forum can also develop larger. I don't know what those so-called powers and status are about. Maybe in your eyes, status is the highest, but I'm different. I created the forum mainly to let everyone have a professional learning forum. Most of the current forums with high popularity are just for chatting, watering, movies, games, etc. I don't focus on the above aspects. My forum is technology-oriented. Although the forum's popularity is not high, I at least do it professionally. Actually, I think the status of the forum is relatively high or not. Having good content is the most important. Let me ask everyone, even if your forum puts everything first, with a name and title but no content, is it a good forum? Of course, I'm not saying this forum has no good content. The content of this forum is really good, which is also one of the main reasons why I want to merge with you. If we can integrate the two forums, won't the forum's popularity be higher? And the reply rate will also be a bit higher? I really don't understand your thoughts. Maybe in your minds, status is the first. I'm different. I recognize a forum with good content as a good forum. Maybe this is also the difference in the way I and everyone look at forums.
Floor10 Wengier Posted 2003-03-13 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
But the issue regarding "posts can only be viewed after replying" mentioned by happy is quite easy to solve. For example, I just need to stipulate that "posts cannot be hidden in the DOS Technology section at least".

Floor11 copy114 Posted 2003-03-13 00:00
初级用户 Posts 37 Credits 229
These are okay as long as we set the rules. It's too easy. The main thing is to see if everyone wants a stable and comprehensive technical forum. If the popularity of the two forums can really be combined, it will increase a lot. The strength of the forum will also become greater.
Floor12 tanglu_sd Posted 2003-03-13 00:00
高级用户 Posts 271 Credits 948 From sd
I'm not very decisive. First, I declare that I personally don't approve of the merger. I like DOS to have its own forum. But the single-drawn moderator's attitude is very sincere. If everyone unanimously agrees to the merger, I'll follow everyone's opinion.
Floor13 happy Posted 2003-03-14 00:00
中级用户 Posts 72 Credits 349
copy114:
Actually, I check the Dantiao Forum every day. Since I'm a newbie, I can only learn here now and don't have the ability to solve problems for everyone yet. But some good posts are hidden and can't be seen. This can only make the level of experts higher and the level of newbies lower. If it can really achieve equality for everyone, I support the merger.
Floor14 党委书记 Posted 2003-03-15 00:00
高级用户 Posts 217 Credits 912 From 广东
I always hold a wait-and-see attitude towards the matter of the merger of the two forums. But as long as it is beneficial to our "China DOS Union", I will definitely support it. In my eyes, there is always wengier and always DOS.
Floor15 Sandy Posted 2003-03-15 00:00
元老会员 Posts 157 Credits 608
If merged,咩咩咩……
1 2  Next
[ Contact the Union admin team - 中国DOS联盟 - Standard version ]
Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023