中国DOS联盟论坛

China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union
中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-09-15 07:10
47,812 topics / 349,917 posts / today 0 new / 48,268 members
DOS软件下载 & 游戏分享 (下载室) » Is there a DOS disk defragmenter?
Printable Version  7,114 / 16
Floor1 lbh-exe Posted 2004-04-13 00:00
中级用户 Posts 26 Credits 205
Floor2 Kinglion Posted 2004-04-14 00:00
铂金会员 Posts 1,924 Credits 5,798 From 金獅電腦軟體工作室
There are MS-DEFRAG in MSDOS 6.22 and PC-DEFRAG in PCDOS. But unfortunately neither supports FAT32 partitions. Also, Norton Utilities has a similar program, but it doesn't support FAT32 partitions either.
Floor3 lbh-exe Posted 2004-04-23 00:00
中级用户 Posts 26 Credits 205
Doesn't support FAT31???? Then what do I do??? Is there any other way???
Floor4 MYS Posted 2004-04-25 00:00
元老会员 Posts 1,637 Credits 5,170 From 广东佛山
No, for now I still haven't found a DOS disk defragmentation/optimization tool that supports FAT32.
Floor5 Wengier Posted 2004-04-25 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
There is, however, a DEFRAG for Win3.x that supports FAT32 and long filenames.
Floor6 Michael Posted 2004-05-15 00:00
钻石会员 Posts 3,041 Credits 10,056
This for Win 3.x defrag always says my disk is locked by another program and can't continue. It gives the same message even when defragmenting a floppy disk, so that's basically the same as being unusable.
But Norton Speedisk for Win3.2 can defragment just fine for me.
Floor7 Wengier Posted 2004-05-19 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
Michael, that shouldn't be the case. How come I've never seen that message? Could it be a wrong setting?
Floor8 Michael Posted 2004-05-20 00:00
钻石会员 Posts 3,041 Credits 10,056
What setting? I didn't see any special settings in it.
Could it be a problem with my Windows? Then why does my Speedisk for Win3.x work fine??
Floor9 jkbbs Posted 2004-05-20 00:00
初级用户 Posts 2 Credits 99
Floor10 Wengier Posted 2004-05-21 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
I just tested this for Win3.x DEFRAG that supports FAT32 and long filenames again. I suspect you're using it under DOS 6.22 + Win3.x, right? (I just specifically tried it under DOS 6.22 + Win3.2 and sure enough got the disk locked error message.) This DEFRAG should be used under MS-DOS 7.10 + Win3.x, and cannot be used under older DOS versions.
Floor11 Kinglion Posted 2004-05-21 00:00
铂金会员 Posts 1,924 Credits 5,798 From 金獅電腦軟體工作室
What Wengier said is right. DOS 6.22 itself doesn't support FAT32, so how could other software be made to support FAT32 on top of it?
Floor12 Michael Posted 2004-05-24 00:00
钻石会员 Posts 3,041 Credits 10,056
Yes, I'm using 6.22,
to kinglion: I wouldn't think like that the way you do. I just wanted it to support long filenames, because I use 4dos.
Floor13 Roy Posted 2004-05-24 00:00
管理员 Posts 1,633 Credits 4,869
The following is quoted from Michael's post on 2004-5-24 01:13:59 AM:
Yes, I'm using 6.22,
to kinglion:I wouldn't think like that the way you do. I just wanted it to support long filenames, because I use 4dos.
The so-called long filename support of 4dos+dos6.22 is only maintained through descript.ion anyway.... calmira can also display this kind of long filename.
Floor14 Wengier Posted 2004-05-24 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
Besides supporting Win9x-format long filenames and FAT32 partitions, MS-DOS 7.10 also supports functions such as "disk locking," while 6.22 does not. So the for Win3.x DEFRAG can only be used under MS-DOS 7.10 + Win3.x, and cannot be used under older DOS versions (please note that old DOS versions have very poor compatibility with newer DOS software). Michael, don't you have 7.10? So why are you instead using Win3.x + DEFRAG under an older DOS version, and then saying it can't be used? (I really find that strange, since it works perfectly fine here.)
Floor15 Michael Posted 2004-05-27 00:00
钻石会员 Posts 3,041 Credits 10,056
Of course I have 7.10, and 7.10 and 6.22 coexist on the same FAT16 partition. I sometimes also run Windows under 7.10, but when exiting, I have to do cd\windows, otherwise it says file allocation table error.
Besides, Windows 3.1 doesn't support long filenames. I'm only playing around with it anyway. I'm afraid it might accidentally damage the long filenames on my other partitions, so I only want it to recognize my FAT16 partition that doesn't have long filenames. So most of the time I run Windows 3.11 under 6.22.
1 2  Next
[ Contact the Union admin team - 中国DOS联盟 - Standard version ]
Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023