中国DOS联盟论坛

China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union
中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-09-06 05:43
47,812 topics / 349,914 posts / today 0 new / 48,268 members
DOS启动盘 & LOGO技术 (启动盘室) » Great news: DOSLFN can now fully support Chinese long filenames!
Printable Version  14,126 / 75
Floor1 Wengier Posted 2003-01-15 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
Today, the author of DOSLFN told me that he released the latest version 0.32l today. I just tested it, and it can now fully support Chinese long filenames! Download address:
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~heha/hs_freeware/doslfn.zip

Everyone can treat it as an essential tool, and even put it in C:\AUTOEXEC.BAT, because it is very stable and will not have any conflicts with WIN.
Floor2 baobolz Posted 2003-01-15 00:00
中级用户 Posts 69 Credits 373
Great! Can you upload one to the forum?
Floor3 雨飞 Posted 2003-01-15 00:00
初级用户 Posts 25 Credits 151
Great. I'll test it.
Floor4 Wengier Posted 2003-01-15 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
All right, I'm uploading it to the forum now:
Open attachment

One thing to note: in order for DOSLFN to automatically load the Chinese long filename table to support Chinese long filenames, you can first use the COUNTRY command in CONFIG.SYS to set the code page to 936, or use the CHCP command to switch the code page to 936, or you can also use the /Z parameter of DOSLFN to manually set the code page to 936, for example: LH DOSLFN /Z CP936UNI.TBL. If it is Traditional Chinese, then just use CP950UNI.TBL instead of CP936UNI.TBL.
Floor5 Roy Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
管理员 Posts 1,633 Credits 4,869
But when it comes to supporting Traditional Chinese filenames, it's a complete mess……….
Floor6 Wengier Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
There is no problem with Traditional Chinese either, as long as you set the code page to 950.
Floor7 Roy Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
管理员 Posts 1,633 Credits 4,869
The following is quoted from Wengier's post on 2003-1-16 9:20:24:
There is no problem with Traditional Chinese either, as long as you set the code page to 950.
I already did that long ago, but the result is the same.
Floor8 Roy Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
管理员 Posts 1,633 Credits 4,869
The following is quoted from Wengier's post on 2003-1-16 9:20:24:
There is no problem with Traditional Chinese either, as long as you set the code page to 950.

Here's proof!!
This one uses code page 950:

This one uses code page 936:
Floor9 pfox Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
银牌会员 Posts 446 Credits 1,451
0.32m is already out, try the new version and see whether it still goes wrong.
Also, doslfn seems not to support GBK yet, Wengier, is that so?
If so, could you contact the author and ask him to add GBK support?


Floor10 Roy Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
管理员 Posts 1,633 Credits 4,869
The following is quoted from pfox's post on 2003-1-16 17:17:22:
0.32m is already out, try the new version and see whether it still goes wrong.
Also, doslfn seems not to support GBK yet, Wengier, is that so?
If so, could you contact the author and ask him to add GBK support.

Still no good……
Traditional Chinese filenames are still wrong……
Floor11 Wengier Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
I'll test Traditional Chinese. As for GBK support, it is already explained in the TXT file of DOSLFN. The TBL file for GBK is too large (48K), while GB2312 is only 15K, so only GB2312 is supported and GBK cannot be supported for now. Likewise, because the TBL for Korean is also too large (47K), it cannot be supported either. Right now DBCS only supports Chinese and Japanese.

As for DOSLFN 0.32m, it mainly fixes two BUGs that I reported to its author, for example the BUG where “DOSLFN /?” would crash the machine. The download address is the same as for 0.32l.
Floor12 jssyq Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
银牌会员 Posts 498 Credits 1,231
I'll say something that may sound laughable: this software doesn't seem very useful, maybe I just don't know how to use it
Floor13 Wengier Posted 2003-01-16 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
It's extremely useful. If you say it's useless, then you definitely don't know how to use it. Note: the best effect is when used under MS-DOS 7.10.
Floor14 yiyesong Posted 2003-01-17 00:00
元老会员 Posts 632 Credits 1,987
It really is quite good.
Floor15 Wengier Posted 2003-01-17 00:00
系统支持 Posts 10,521 Credits 27,736
Roy:
I mentioned the problem you brought up to the author of DOSLFN. He said it might be a problem with the CP950 table, and it has now been replaced, so you can download it again and try it. Also, now even Korean is supported. GBK still won't work for now, because it is 64.5K, larger than the 64K maximum.
1 2 3 46  Next
[ Contact the Union admin team - 中国DOS联盟 - Standard version ]
Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023