China DOS Union

What can I do?
Just give me instructions!!!
W. Such as. DD. KO....................etc.
Can contact me via MSN/QQ!!!!

Additionally, let me state my view:
I think we can combine such disks and use 4 options to call the corresponding ones. As for the capacity, we can not worry about it. We can use large-capacity IMG and then use the boot disk to call.

I like maintenance tools and so on. I should be able to help a bit! (Hehe! Actually I'm quite inexperienced)

I added the Super Boot Disk and the Chinese Boot Disk``````I'm a newbie, but I will work hard

I think creating a DOS platform that can run various DOS programs might meet the needs of many friends.

The following is the speech of bigfinger on July 11, 2003 at 13:30:54:
Honestly speaking, no matter what, the frequency of us using DOS now is very low, and we still think that content is more important than form!

I think that from a practical perspective, the significance of a DOS boot disk is to meet urgent needs, so how to arrange more practical content in a limited space is the key point for us to consider. Instead of adding some flashy things, it is better to combine various software from the perspective of different users. If the thing made can boot quickly, have comprehensive content, be highly practical, have a fast update speed, and have more comprehensive instructions, I think it will be welcomed by everyone!

Generally speaking, I feel that Wengier's super boot disk is good, (but if the logo is removed, the CAB package is not used, and the boot menu is made more detailed to adapt to different users and shorten the boot time... then it will be more practical).

Of course, the above are just personal opinions. Please correct any inaccuracies, great experts!!

Strongly in favor!!!

Put forward a suggestion:
The size doesn't matter. If the floppy disk can't hold it, it can be placed on the CD.
But mainly:
1. High stability is required.
2. Support various functions of DOS, such as mouse, CD drive, Chinese long file names, large hard disk, large memory, USB devices, etc. Use MS-DOS 7.10 as the kernel and fully support NTFS.
3. Make a disk that can be used in different software and hardware environments (the software environment is the WINDOWS system).

Support the super boot disk!!!

Seeing everyone's posts, I'm really grateful for everyone's efforts. I'm a newbie and can't help much, so I can only come here to support you. Always support you!

Whether DOS is useful mainly depends on its practical value. Now that floppy drives are rarely used, is it a bit too... to consider 1.44M? Actually, making the boot disk on a CD is the most practical.

I participated in the localization of boot disks, for example, I have now localized the WIN98 boot disk

What is DOS, what is DOS, I feel that it's getting a bit blurry now. My understanding is that the DOS system should have the following 5 properties: simple boot and startup environment, character mode or character-based graphic mode, ability to operate disks and files, freely combinable programs, and certain compatibility with Windows systems (this one can be considered for modification).

Most of my computers no longer have floppy drives, but I think the basic DOS standard should still be an operating system based on floppy disks, so as to reflect the conciseness of DOS. Especially to give full play to its performance within the size of a 1.44M floppy disk, so as to reflect the sophistication of the technology. If there is no limit on the capacity, the system will become a hodgepodge, messy and impractical, and will be regarded as rubbish, which is harmful to the survival and development of DOS, so there is no need to develop a pure DOS CD-ROM system.

USB support is the direction of DOS development. In this regard, a boot standard for DOS and simple operation tools should be developed. Just as DOS supports floppy disks, it can naturally support USB and should have strong compatibility. But even if the capacity of USB storage can be very large, don't be eager to make the volume of DOS larger and larger. It is best to still adhere to the 1.44M standard for technological development.

LOGO is just a flash-by screen, its production has no technical content, and it occupies a lot of space, with a rubbish nature, and should be removed from the system.

Can my Super Boot Multi-system Maintenance Disk be counted as participating in the DOS Emergency Boot Disk project?

I'd like to give it a try too!

I also want a bootable floppy disk, but I want a bootable CD even more.

Making it into a CD version is the most appropriate, 3.5-inch is the best. I am currently doing system maintenance with just a 3.5-inch CD, which is very convenient. Looking forward to the masterpieces of the top experts!!!!!

Still compress Windows 98 onto a CD

Hope to combine 1 and 3