To be honest, no matter what, the frequency of us using DOS now is very low. We still think that content is more important than form!
I think that from a practical perspective, the significance of a DOS boot disk is to meet unforeseen needs. So how to arrange more practical content in a limited space is the key point we need to consider. Instead of adding some flashy but useless things, it is better to combine various software from the perspectives of different users. If the thing made can boot quickly, has comprehensive content, strong practicality, fast update speed, and has more comprehensive instructions, I think it will be welcomed by everyone!
Generally speaking, I feel that Wengier's super boot disk is good, (but if we remove that LOGO, don't use the CAB package, and make the boot menu more detailed to adapt to different users and shorten the boot time..., then it will be more practical).
Of course, the above are just personal opinions. If there are any inaccuracies, please correct them, esteemed experts!
I think that from a practical perspective, the significance of a DOS boot disk is to meet unforeseen needs. So how to arrange more practical content in a limited space is the key point we need to consider. Instead of adding some flashy but useless things, it is better to combine various software from the perspectives of different users. If the thing made can boot quickly, has comprehensive content, strong practicality, fast update speed, and has more comprehensive instructions, I think it will be welcomed by everyone!
Generally speaking, I feel that Wengier's super boot disk is good, (but if we remove that LOGO, don't use the CAB package, and make the boot menu more detailed to adapt to different users and shorten the boot time..., then it will be more practical).
Of course, the above are just personal opinions. If there are any inaccuracies, please correct them, esteemed experts!








