I didn't make changes to the Chinese part. Maybe because the new changes affected the Chinese part during packaging, it's恐怕 not easy to find out exactly where the mistake is. We can further observe and see where the problem is. Those 8 patches, changing the ones in front will affect the ones behind, but as long as the compilation passes, I think it's basically okay. So, exactly what's wrong still needs a more detailed report. What I can solve, I'll solve; if I can't solve it, I'll wait for others to solve it. I don't use the Chinese version myself, so I didn't notice the problem. But you can contact the relevant friends of the Chinese version and see what experience they have.
Using find like this doesn't seem necessary? It's a function that's optional. Logically, it's not very reasonable. Because according to your logic, all similar commands would have to be combined into one, and then there would be more than one or two changes.
Using find like this doesn't seem necessary? It's a function that's optional. Logically, it's not very reasonable. Because according to your logic, all similar commands would have to be combined into one, and then there would be more than one or two changes.
因为我们亲手创建,这个世界更加美丽。

