The best USB 2.0 drivers under DOS - China DOS Union Forum

Everyone is discussing the USB2 transmission of this software under DOS, but I don't know if it's really the case.

The boot USB drive I made with the boot USB drive making software downloaded from this site has only DUSE.EXE, and none of the other related drivers. So the transmission speed is extremely slow. An 800M file took more than 40 minutes to finish, which is really annoying. Then

1. In this post, it is said that only one line needs to be added to CONFIG.SYS: "device=duse.exe INT13 drive=2" (actually, I just added "INT13 drive=2" to the original device=duse.exe). Is it really enough? Because compared with the original SYS, it's just adding "INT13 drive=2" in the same line. Will this definitely have an effect? I have doubts.

2. Some experts also said to add this
device=USBASPI.SYS
device=Di1000dd.SYS
(Of course, I know that his premise is that these two and related files must be available). Then will this definitely be feasible?

There is no way to talk nonsense without comparison, and the success of only one attempt cannot be taken as a feasible method. Technology emphasizes "precision, uniqueness, and effectiveness"!

I don't know if all the experts have considered these things.

Floor46　shijimdiai	Posted 2005-10-25 10:09
新手上路　Posts 2　Credits 2
Why doesn't mine work?

Floor47　wwj402	Posted 2005-11-01 14:17
初级用户　Posts 19　Credits 133
Thanks

Floor48　gongchengxi	Posted 2005-11-17 13:42
初级用户　Posts 20　Credits 40
There are cracked versions in the forum.

Floor50　samuelzhang	Posted 2007-05-12 14:17
新手上路　Posts 3　Credits 8
USB 2.0 under DOS, that's amazing~

Floor51　jiaking	Posted 2007-06-07 15:02
中级用户　Posts 52　Credits 223
Some USB drives can be used with usbmass, but some can't be recognized with usbaspi + di1000dd. It's necessary to manually onload usbmass. If you forget, it will stay in memory. Using mi to check several times with usbmass, you'll find multiple usbmass occupying memory. In this way, the executable memory runs out quickly.

Floor49　gongchengxi	Posted 2005-11-18 20:45
初级用户　Posts 20　Credits 40

Floor52　kinglin	Posted 2007-07-03 14:31
初级用户　Posts 28　Credits 62

Floor53　southsnow	Posted 2007-08-20 12:22
新手上路　Posts 5　Credits 10
I have no points, so I can't download.

Floor54　cqszhyd	Posted 2007-09-27 22:13
新手上路　Posts 3　Credits 6

Floor55　h971112	Posted 2007-09-29 14:06
新手上路　Posts 2　Credits 4
It seems good, next one

Floor56　h971112	Posted 2007-09-29 14:09
新手上路　Posts 2　Credits 4
Unable to download? Depressed

Floor57　gdcn7	Posted 2007-10-11 21:18
新手上路　Posts 10　Credits 17
It seems good, let's try the next one

Floor58　cool3ku	Posted 2007-10-18 14:49
新手上路　Posts 3　Credits 6

Floor59　felta	Posted 2007-10-22 13:19
新手上路　Posts 1　Credits 2
There is such a good thing

Floor60　erdaxia	Posted 2007-12-11 08:22
新手上路　Posts 2　Credits 4
Everyone is discussing the USB2 transmission of this software under DOS, but I don't know if it's really the case. The boot USB drive I made with the boot USB drive making software downloaded from this site has only DUSE.EXE, and none of the other related drivers. So the transmission speed is extremely slow. An 800M file took more than 40 minutes to finish, which is really annoying. Then 1. In this post, it is said that only one line needs to be added to CONFIG.SYS: "device=duse.exe INT13 drive=2" (actually, I just added "INT13 drive=2" to the original device=duse.exe). Is it really enough? Because compared with the original SYS, it's just adding "INT13 drive=2" in the same line. Will this definitely have an effect? I have doubts. 2. Some experts also said to add this device=USBASPI.SYS device=Di1000dd.SYS (Of course, I know that his premise is that these two and related files must be available). Then will this definitely be feasible? There is no way to talk nonsense without comparison, and the success of only one attempt cannot be taken as a feasible method. Technology emphasizes "precision, uniqueness, and effectiveness"! I don't know if all the experts have considered these things.