China DOS Union

I'm not talking about your three pictures. The white in the foreground isn't inverse color. That's not inverse color.

That's the effect of IE + dark color, not inverse color effect

Just like when you select a certain icon on the desktop and the icon color changes, it's the same principle. It's just that the implementation methods are different. That one is adding dark to each pixel originally, and this IE is adding dark to every other pixel

The experiment done by Brother M before clearly shows that IE's so-called "inverse color" is just a method where IE applies a dark color to the selected image. What I'm talking about is that the image may have hidden and hard-to-see transition colors, which is caused by lossy compression. If it's really inverting pixel by pixel, the pixels hidden in the background or foreground may all be obviously displayed.

I quoted an example in my post, which are those two emoji. When using +dark, there is a white border, and this white border is the so-called blurred effect. And if you look more closely at that white border, you will find that it is filled with other colors at intervals. This is the effect of the +dark color in IE.

Brother Micheal mentioned that "the blue used for inverse color filling" is actually closely related to the system's appearance color. In fact, the color used for filling is not necessarily blue. As long as you change "Selected item" to another color in the "Appearance" of Display Properties (as shown after changing to red), then those three triangles will present as illusory three triangles, not the "two horizontal lines夹ing an illusory triangle" in the willsort texture map.

Re All:

This is an image made using the principle of IE selection enhancement color. When the image is selected, it changes from black-and-white (actually pseudo black-and-white) to colorful. Judging from its production method, it is somewhat in line with Brother Michael's analysis, but it is a pity that the original text did not mention the basic principle. The web link is as follows:

http://www.enet.com.cn/article/2005/0810/A20050810443315.shtml


[ Last edited by willsort on 2005-9-12 at 23:24 ]

JonePeng, I also noticed this problem. For example, when the appearance mode changes, the highlight color of the menu also changes from blue to other colors, such as red. Inversion is not an exact term. The system just needs to distinguish between the selected object and the unselected one, and there is no need to perform "inversion" on it according to special rules.

I think, in the post of willsort, the pictures seem to be interval color + 180 hue (this is the authentic inverse color, becoming the original complementary color), and in IE, selecting the image is exactly interval pixel - 180 hue. After the two processing times before and after, the colors complement each other and naturally return to the original color, but because the interval pixel is black, the picture becomes darker when restored.

Maybe it's like this.

Re All:

Here are some other pictures, and there are also some principle discussions on its forum webpage. The webpage link is as follows:

http://www.blueidea.com/bbs/newsdetail.asp?id=1100775





[ Last edited by willsort on 2005-9-13 at 09:00 ]

Well. Actually, there are many such pictures on the Internet. I have all seen them.

In the Mozilla series, there is no such situation...

Originally posted by Roy at 2005-9-14 10:39 AM:
There is no such situation in the Mozilla series...

Well, that's right

The picture on floor 38 is very simple. Just distribute the pixel intervals of that beautiful woman. Because other pixels will turn blue. I vaguely saw the shadow of the beautiful woman when I didn't select that picture.