China DOS Union

Converting to EXE is to protect the source code from being modified (even if you can see the temporary file, can you modify the EXE?).

If you modify it and then convert it to EXE, isn't it still modified?

There are only 2 purposes for making EXE from bat: preventing novices from seeing the code, and 2 hiding the CMD window.

The latter is more practical. The former is just too...

Converting to EXE is to protect the source code from being modified (even if you can see the temporary file, can you modify the EXE?)

May I ask how you mean modifying the EXE? Does the EXE contain other files, or does it include other functions into the EXE?

All are people who take things out of context.

Don't I know there are temporary files? Make a batch script yourself and write a line to display the path, and everything is exposed.

What I mean is that the condition is relying on the system's own tools.

Which is easier to modify, a BAT or an EXE? Speak with your brain. A small notepad or EDIT under CMD can see garbled code, what about EXE? Notepad decompilation?

The modification I'm talking about is, for example, modifying the BAT in the EXE, such as changing MD to RD. I really don't know how to understand that someone said to convert back to EXE.

Those who prohibit CMD or change the CMD registry, if I don't say this is a BAT converted to EXE, would you do this? I more believe that you would do this when you see BAT.

And the purpose of my reply is the sentence from someone on the 7th floor - P.S. Why convert to exe? When you convert to exe and give it to others, generally others won't run it. For yourself? Then why bother, every time you run it, temporary files are generated.

There is no other meaning.

All are people who take things out of context.

Don't I know there are temporary files? Make a batch script yourself and write a line to display the path, and everything is exposed.

Batch scripts are for communication, so what if it's exposed?

What I mean is, the condition is relying on the system's built-in tools.

IFEO hijacking CMD, BAT, VBS, etc. can all find newly generated files.

Which is easier to modify, a BAT or an EXE? Speak with your brain. A small notepad or EDIT under CMD can see garbled code, but an EXE? Notepad decompilation?

Is your bat the best? Open source can be optimized according to your own needs, and some others can improve your script. Which is more convenient for you to modify, EXE or BAT?

The modification I'm talking about is, for example, modifying the BAT in the EXE, such as changing MD to RD. I really don't know how that person who said re-converting to EXE understands it.

Modifying the BAT in the EXE and then converting it back to EXE, isn't that someone else modifying your thing for you?

Even directly in the EXE, you can modify it. I saw that EXE, it's just XORing the code to ASCII and laok123 or something, I didn't look closely at the encryption process.

So you can make corresponding modifications in the EXE, changing M to R.

Those who prohibit CMD or change the CMD registry, if I don't say this is a BAT converted to EXE, would you do this? I believe you would do this when you see a BAT.

When you see a BAT, you don't need to do this, just right-click to edit.

If you release an EXE, first of all, if I want to download it, I at least need to know what it's for. If I want to crack it, I also need to see what language your code is written in. If someone says it's written in a high-level language, there's no need to do this. It depends on the situation.

If your thing isn't very useful, just write it yourself. If you write it, then consider whether to crack it for you to see.

What they did is to tell you that converting BAT to EXE is too easy to find the source code, which doesn't achieve the purpose.

And the purpose of my reply is the sentence from someone on the 7th floor - P.S. Why convert to exe? Converting to exe and giving it to others, generally others won't run it. For yourself? Then why bother, generating temporary files every time you run it.

There's no other meaning.

This won't be commented on, just use it if you like. Their meaning might be that using it is just psychological comfort~

It's still recommended to release scripts open source.

Converting to EXE is to protect the source code from being modified (even if you can see the temporary file, can you modify the EXE?)

I understand. If you are worried that the code you have written will be modified and lose the function of the script, you need to convert it to an exe.

[ Last edited by tireless on 2008-9-20 at 07:04 PM ]

Why does Bat To Exe Converter report a virus.

According to a friend in a QQ group I joined:

Because when converting BAT to EXE, if the EXE is too small, the library support called when the EXE releases the BAT is the system's own. Many antivirus software has defined these DLL library functions as unsafe. So to avoid being killed by antivirus, these library files should be changed and separated.

Of course, if you do bad things too much, the engineers of the antivirus manufacturer will still define these separated functions, but this kind of thing is rare (bored to death), unless it is as widespread as Panda.

However Batch Processor Stalker V5.0 has many useless resources in the converted exe. Picture:





--------------------------------------
楼主, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. I understand your idea, which is to prevent the source code from being modified

tireless




You've exposed all the things about "Batch Processing Stalker V"~

[ Last edited by fengyang on 2008-9-21 at 07:36 PM ]

First, download it. Then try it slowly. Thanks

Thanks, accepted, heh heh

The function is not particularly special.
Tried it.
1. Converting files larger than 100k is over 600k and it doesn't work.
2. Large files are too slow.
3. Similarly, the source code is easily obtainable.
I think QuickBFC.EXE is more reliable.

Cracking batch files encrypted by "Quick Batch File Compiler" with OllyDBG
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=43502

Come and take a look,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

It feels good. By the way, is there a VIP version?

Originally posted by 624378168 at 2008-11-9 09:22 PM:
It feels good. By the way, is there a VIP version?

There is no VIP version. There is a latest version 6.0

Click to download