中国DOS联盟论坛

China DOS Union

-- Unite DOS · Advance DOS · Grow DOS --
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
Guest | Log in | Register | Members | Search | China DOS Union
中国DOS联盟论坛
The time now is 2026-10-31 03:28
47,815 topics / 349,930 posts / today 0 new / 48,290 members
DOS开发编程 & 发展交流 (开发室) » Introduction to the Use of Borland C++ 3.1 Classic Development Tool (Link Updated)
Printable Version  23,546 / 59
Floor16 windowsvesta Posted 2007-09-19 12:17
初级用户 Posts 67 Credits 138 From 云南
Good
Floor17 wzsunlight Posted 2007-09-20 22:57
初级用户 Posts 52 Credits 107
Thanks
Floor18 microsoft Posted 2007-10-08 20:45
新手上路 Posts 3 Credits 6
错误出现在链接中 >>>

请点击新链接进行下载 > >
Floor19 gnimye Posted 2007-10-12 12:06
初级用户 Posts 10 Credits 20
Support the LZ. I've been using DOS for high-resolution graphical interface control system program development. I once used djgpp and Watcom C. Now I've been using BC++ 3.1 for DOS all the time. Because the required sampling time is 0.417ms, so it's hard to do on Windows. I support DOS.
Floor20 zzhh612 Posted 2007-10-24 18:35
中级用户 Posts 103 Credits 278
Regarding the issue of the download link, since the upload space has been frozen, I currently can't resolve this problem.
Floor21 Waterlive Posted 2007-10-28 22:42
初级用户 Posts 21 Credits 52
Can't download~~~ Did I come too late?
Floor22 pijiudu Posted 2007-11-12 11:17
新手上路 Posts 2 Credits 4
[email protected]
Floor23 cxjnet Posted 2007-11-30 00:45
新手上路 Posts 4 Credits 7
Thanks, it's really a good thing, but the usage instructions can't be downloaded
Floor24 bobo98 Posted 2008-01-07 05:18
初级用户 Posts 20 Credits 43
Originally posted by gnimye at 2007-10-12 12:06 PM:
Support the landlord. I have been using DOS to develop high-resolution graphical interface control system programs. I have used djgpp and WatcomC before, and now I have been using BC++ 3.1 for DOS all the time. Because the required sampling time is 0.417ms, it is difficult to do it under Windows, so I support DOS


Under Windows NT, there is a high-precision time counter, but its programming difficulty is relatively greater if real-time is required.
Floor25 bush Posted 2008-01-07 14:11
银牌会员 Posts 730 Credits 2,165
Although classic, but a bit old. Still, it's better to choose a newer compiler.
Floor26 xiehechong Posted 2008-01-31 12:57
新手上路 Posts 6 Credits 11
This is my beloved!
Floor27 dxy1000 Posted 2008-02-02 14:20
新手上路 Posts 1 Credits 2
Floor28 hulijunlooks Posted 2008-03-25 18:32
新手上路 Posts 1 Credits 2
Introduction is not needed now. Can I send the following? My QQ is 327445828
Floor29 zzhh612 Posted 2008-03-31 01:25
中级用户 Posts 103 Credits 278
The original invalid links have all been updated recently. If you have any questions, feel free to contact us!
Floor30 couragexu Posted 2008-04-08 14:50
新手上路 Posts 1 Credits 2
Can it replace VC++ 1.52?
Prev  1 2 3 4  Next
[ Contact the Union admin team - 中国DOS联盟 - Standard version ]
Sponsored by ifanr Inc | © 2001–2023