China DOS Union

Originally posted by namejm at 2006-11-11 10:23 AM:
Just now, I checked the grade division of the scoring points and found that from -33 to +37, with 7 points as one grade, a total of 11 grades are divided. The reward plan for posting has not changed. Still, posting a new thread rewards 4 points, and replying ...

Well, the original spacing was a bit too large, I adjusted it.

It would be nice to have levels of +2 and -2. At least -2 should be added. Because creating a new post gives +4 and replying gives +2. If there is a need to deduct points as a warning for a new post with an ambiguous title or an inappropriate reply, the minimum deduction should be 4 points, which is a bit heavy.

Users with negative points can still deposit 10 yuan to buy 1000 points to top up, haha...

Originally posted by namejm at 2006-11-11 11:25 AM:
　　It would be nice to have +2 and -2 levels. At least -2 should be added, because creating a new post gives +4, replying gives +2. If there is a need to give a warning deduction for new posts with vague titles or inappropriate replies, the most...

The code has been modified, adding -2 and +2 points.

Look at my +20. Haha. When will I register two sock puppets, and the two will add points to each other………………Haha～～

I just changed the scoring operation records to an expandable/collapsible style. You can expand it by clicking. Let's see how it is now.

Changing the rating operation record to a scalable style to reduce the layout space occupation is really good. It would be even better if the background color could be adjusted so that it doesn't appear so abrupt in the entire layout. It is suggested to make it in the style of [code][/code] or [quote][/quote].

Originally posted by electronixtar at 2006-11-11 12:04:
Check out my +20. Haha.

　　Thanks to brother electronixtar for the rating, +20 is a bit high, I feel unworthy. If you can use your rating authority carefully and give more points to newbies, that would be great. Thanks again.

Originally posted by namejm at 2006-11-11 01:49 PM:
　　Change the scoring operation record to a scalable style, which reduces the space occupied by the layout. It's really good. If the background color can be adjusted so that it doesn't stand out so much in the entire layout, it will be even better...

Well, I adjusted the background color. Let's take a look.

It would be best if the background color of the operation record could be integrated with the background color of the entire post, otherwise, it looks like a patch and is very glaring.

In addition, when using the expand/hide function, it is found that there is an inhumane aspect: after each click, the browsing position will automatically jump to the top of the building instead of staying in the original position, which is very inconvenient. Please wengier figure out a way to solve this problem.

[ Last edited by namejm on 2006-11-11 at 02:52 PM ]

I remember the original maximum evaluation scores were:

Junior user:
Maximum evaluation score per time: 2
Maximum evaluation score per day: 10

Intermediate user:
Maximum evaluation score per time: 4
Maximum evaluation score per day: 15

Originally posted by namejm at 2006-11-11 02:50 PM:
　　It's best to integrate the background color of the operation record with the background color of the entire post. Otherwise, it looks like a patch, which is very glaring.

　　In addition, when using the expand/hide function, I found a less user-friendly aspect: every time you click, the browsing position automatically jumps to the top of the building, instead of staying in the original position, which is very inconvenient. Please, wengier, find a way to solve this problem.

The following problem has now been solved. And regarding the above problem of integrating the background color, let's first discuss what "integrated" background color can be used.

Thanks to brother electronixtar for the score, +20 is a bit high, I don't deserve it. If you can use your scoring authority carefully and give more of your points to newbies, that would be great. Thanks again.

It's okay～～Find a chance to get it back～～Haha, just kidding.

Originally posted by vkill at 2006-11-11 04:34 PM:
Isn't this messy?

What exactly is said to be messy?