Re 雨露:
Your suggestion was previously proposed by someone, and I feel there seems to be something lacking.
From a management perspective, if a forum member has the right to operate others' topics or reply posts, it can be considered that they have management authority, which also means becoming a member of the forum management. As a management member, in addition to assuming various responsibilities and obligations of management members, they should also inform the managed board area of the acquisition of their management authority. The most direct way of notification is the modification of their user group.
Your so-called "honorary moderator" and other titles are essentially the identification of a specific user group, but this identification does not fully match the user group authority I envisioned. Because my vision is not only that my ID does not appear in the moderator user group, but also that all the operation authorities inherited from the moderator user group are canceled, because this can really play a safer protective role.
And a user group that does not have moderator authority should not be appropriate to have the word "moderator" in its title. "Honorary member" is a reasonable title, but I personally have a dislike for the word "honorary". I always feel that "honorary" is a decorative word of "redundant". If everyone can think of a better title or plan, I am willing to seriously consider it.
But these are all future things. My current idea is still to hope to cancel my moderator title and its corresponding authority as soon as possible, so that I can safely be offline for a long time.
Your suggestion was previously proposed by someone, and I feel there seems to be something lacking.
From a management perspective, if a forum member has the right to operate others' topics or reply posts, it can be considered that they have management authority, which also means becoming a member of the forum management. As a management member, in addition to assuming various responsibilities and obligations of management members, they should also inform the managed board area of the acquisition of their management authority. The most direct way of notification is the modification of their user group.
Your so-called "honorary moderator" and other titles are essentially the identification of a specific user group, but this identification does not fully match the user group authority I envisioned. Because my vision is not only that my ID does not appear in the moderator user group, but also that all the operation authorities inherited from the moderator user group are canceled, because this can really play a safer protective role.
And a user group that does not have moderator authority should not be appropriate to have the word "moderator" in its title. "Honorary member" is a reasonable title, but I personally have a dislike for the word "honorary". I always feel that "honorary" is a decorative word of "redundant". If everyone can think of a better title or plan, I am willing to seriously consider it.
But these are all future things. My current idea is still to hope to cancel my moderator title and its corresponding authority as soon as possible, so that I can safely be offline for a long time.
※ Batchinger 致 Bat Fans:请访问 批处理编程的异类 ,欢迎交流与共享批处理编程心得!


