China DOS Union

Do you mean that because I can't say what's good about 2003, you have to think it's worthless? Then why did people spend so much money to develop it? I don't believe you're still using win95! Why do I say it's good? I'm not a Microsoft salesman. I'm just saying "cool" because the forum I couldn't log in to before can be logged in now! Isn't that okay?

I didn't say that 2003 is completely useless. I'm only expressing my view regarding what you previously said about the high success rate and fast speed of opening this forum with 2003 and your comparison environment. Just because of your test environment, it can't be fairly concluded that the high success rate and fast speed of opening this forum must be due to the.NET framework of 2003.

nre, LK, don't be so angry. Windows 2003 is indeed quite good, but not many people have used it, so naturally no one knows what its advantages are. And you said you can't enter the forum, maybe it's because of network issues, not much to do with the system. I use Windows 98 SE + IE 5.5 and can enter the forum every time, and the speed is also very fast

Whether the credit of the.NET framework is concerned, I have corrected it earlier, and you can't prove it's not. I just went back to win98 to check the IE version (actually 6.0.2800.1106), and it's really difficult to enter this forum there. I only look at the problems I encounter and the actual effect, others may be different, for example, you may not be as good as your win98 with 2003.

Moderator P: What method should I use to give you the disk? (611MB)

What you said also makes sense. I think you should check your network.

The following is the speech of LK on 2003-5-4 16:02:34:
Whether the credit of the.NET framework is to be said, I have corrected it earlier. You can't prove that it isn't. I just went back to win98 to check the IE version (actually 6.0.2800.1106). It's really difficult to enter this forum there. I only look at the problems I encounter and the actual effect. Others may be different. For example, you may not be as good as your win98 with 2003.

Moderator P:  How can I give you the disk? (611MB)

Hehe, I don't want to argue about this topic anymore. That's all.

Is Windows 2003 Windows LH?

To be precise, Windows 2003 shows its advantages more when used as a server system.

Hehe, I also installed Windows Server 2003. The interface is better than Windows 2000, and it boots into the system a bit faster, but running programs seems a bit slower. It feels a bit like a combination of Windows 2000 and XP.

Just use the system you like, and if you like to figure things out, just do it. Anyway, with our level, any system is worth trying, whether from the perspective of use or figuring things out

That's quite right...

I didn't try it. no comments.

The following is a quote from Wengier at 2003-5-4 23:35:56:
Is Windows 2003 Windows LH?

No

There is WIN 2003 in my FTP

Win2003 is actually Windows Server 2003,,,,,, mainly for server types, there are 6 versions... For personal users, there is no need to use it: the main advantage is in security issues. Just take shutting down as an example, you have to choose a reason when you want to shut down, otherwise you can't shut down... Hehe

What a hassle!! Oh~~