Seek for usage test reports of NTFS-like software under DOS? - China DOS Union Forum

Seeing that you are pinned, I'll tell you the test results:

1. IFS: Supports Chinese and long file names, but has poor compatibility. When writing to NTFS partitions, errors are prone to occur. It doesn't support Vista partitions. Suggestion: Only use it for viewing, don't write to it.

2. NTFSDOS Pro is quite annoying; it doesn't exit. Don't use it.

3. ntfs4dos: Currently found to have the best compatibility, reading and writing are normal. Disadvantage: Poor Chinese support. Although it can also load Chinese, writing or running under Chinese is prone to errors. Suggestion: Use it for writing operations, just don't add Chinese!

4. omnifs: When used simply, it has very good compatibility, and both reading and writing are very correct. Use it for simple usage. Disadvantage: Runs too slowly, a command takes about 7 seconds. Also, it only brings a few commonly used limited commands and doesn't support other external commands.

I haven't used other ones. My bootable disk computer has these three: ifs\ntfs4dos\omnifs, and I call them according to different needs.

Floor16　zekin	Posted 2008-01-28 18:15
新手上路　Posts 1　Credits 2
I've been searching on Baidu for a long time, and finally found the test instructions for the NTFS tool under DOS here. Thanks, LZ.

Floor17　雨露	Posted 2008-11-04 13:12
管理员　Posts 2,601　Credits 6,215
Each has its own strengths, but none is perfect.

Floor18　goli2008	Posted 2008-12-01 01:17
中级用户　Posts 97　Credits 252
Seeing that you are pinned, I'll tell you the test results: 1. IFS: Supports Chinese and long file names, but has poor compatibility. When writing to NTFS partitions, errors are prone to occur. It doesn't support Vista partitions. Suggestion: Only use it for viewing, don't write to it. 2. NTFSDOS Pro is quite annoying; it doesn't exit. Don't use it. 3. ntfs4dos: Currently found to have the best compatibility, reading and writing are normal. Disadvantage: Poor Chinese support. Although it can also load Chinese, writing or running under Chinese is prone to errors. Suggestion: Use it for writing operations, just don't add Chinese! 4. omnifs: When used simply, it has very good compatibility, and both reading and writing are very correct. Use it for simple usage. Disadvantage: Runs too slowly, a command takes about 7 seconds. Also, it only brings a few commonly used limited commands and doesn't support other external commands. I haven't used other ones. My bootable disk computer has these three: ifs\ntfs4dos\omnifs, and I call them according to different needs.

Floor19　goeasy2005	Posted 2009-02-10 11:39
中级用户　Posts 155　Credits 325
It seems that for writing operations or a large amount of copying and so on, it's still better to use Windows Me. I'm not at all at ease using these.

Floor20　xthzb	Posted 2009-08-04 13:41
新手上路　Posts 3　Credits 6
Useful, very good. Thanks.

Floor21　hybzsz	Posted 2009-09-17 00:50
初级用户　Posts 33　Credits 67

Floor22　gudoudou	Posted 2009-11-14 22:57
初级用户　Posts 36　Credits 73
Actually... Using a USB flash drive to load WinPE is okay... Hehe, this is not within the scope of DOS...

Floor23　GWM	Posted 2010-01-18 06:05
中级用户　Posts 39　Credits 270
Learning