I've been searching on Baidu for a long time, and finally found the test instructions for the NTFS tool under DOS here. Thanks, LZ.
China DOS Union
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!
中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS疑难解答 & 问题讨论 （解答室） » Seek for usage test reports of NTFS-like software under DOS?
StickyI
View 29,523 Replies 22
StickyI
View 29,523 Replies 22
Floor 16
Posted 2008-01-28 18:15 · 中国 广东 广州 黄埔区 电信
Floor 17
Posted 2008-11-04 13:12 · 中国 浙江 台州 玉环市 电信
管理员
★★★★
DOS非常爱好者
Credits 6,215
Posts 2,601
Joined 2006-01-20 13:00
20-year member
UID 49256
Posts 2,601
Joined 2006-01-20 13:00
20-year member
UID 49256
Status Offline
Each has its own strengths, but none is perfect.
Floor 18
Posted 2008-12-01 01:17 · 中国 广西 河池 电信
Seeing that you are pinned, I'll tell you the test results:
1. IFS: Supports Chinese and long file names, but has poor compatibility. When writing to NTFS partitions, errors are prone to occur. It doesn't support Vista partitions. Suggestion: Only use it for viewing, don't write to it.
2. NTFSDOS Pro is quite annoying; it doesn't exit. Don't use it.
3. ntfs4dos: Currently found to have the best compatibility, reading and writing are normal. Disadvantage: Poor Chinese support. Although it can also load Chinese, writing or running under Chinese is prone to errors. Suggestion: Use it for writing operations, just don't add Chinese!
4. omnifs: When used simply, it has very good compatibility, and both reading and writing are very correct. Use it for simple usage. Disadvantage: Runs too slowly, a command takes about 7 seconds. Also, it only brings a few commonly used limited commands and doesn't support other external commands.
I haven't used other ones. My bootable disk computer has these three: ifs\ntfs4dos\omnifs, and I call them according to different needs.
1. IFS: Supports Chinese and long file names, but has poor compatibility. When writing to NTFS partitions, errors are prone to occur. It doesn't support Vista partitions. Suggestion: Only use it for viewing, don't write to it.
2. NTFSDOS Pro is quite annoying; it doesn't exit. Don't use it.
3. ntfs4dos: Currently found to have the best compatibility, reading and writing are normal. Disadvantage: Poor Chinese support. Although it can also load Chinese, writing or running under Chinese is prone to errors. Suggestion: Use it for writing operations, just don't add Chinese!
4. omnifs: When used simply, it has very good compatibility, and both reading and writing are very correct. Use it for simple usage. Disadvantage: Runs too slowly, a command takes about 7 seconds. Also, it only brings a few commonly used limited commands and doesn't support other external commands.
I haven't used other ones. My bootable disk computer has these three: ifs\ntfs4dos\omnifs, and I call them according to different needs.
Floor 19
Posted 2009-02-10 11:39 · 中国 北京 联通
It seems that for writing operations or a large amount of copying and so on, it's still better to use Windows Me. I'm not at all at ease using these.
Floor 20
Posted 2009-08-04 13:41 · 中国 湖北 仙桃 电信
Useful, very good. Thanks.
Floor 21
Posted 2009-09-17 00:50 · 中国 广东 深圳 电信
Floor 22
Posted 2009-11-14 22:57 · 中国 江苏 徐州 中移铁通
Actually... Using a USB flash drive to load WinPE is okay... Hehe, this is not within the scope of DOS...
Floor 23
Posted 2010-01-18 06:05 · 中国 北京 鹏博士BGP
中级用户
★
Credits 270
Posts 39
Joined 2003-12-18 00:00
22-year member
UID 14153
Gender Male
Posts 39
Joined 2003-12-18 00:00
22-year member
UID 14153
Gender Male
Status Offline
Learning
Forum Jump: