China DOS Union

Compfile DOS works normally. Thanks a lot!
Could everyone please provide where to download Strings/Varset? I've been looking for a few days but can't download it.

The commonly used command-line tools I use are downloaded here: Climbing's commonly used DOS command-line tools compressed installation package (about 11M)

First, thank you to climbing, and then I ask: Be a good person to the end, may I ask if climbing can roughly write some comments out? Otherwise, how to use it?

I can't meet such a requirement (this can almost be regarded as an unreasonable request). There are probably hundreds of programs in my installation package. I can't write instructions and comments for these programs one by one. Most of the programs you can get help by running with the /? parameter (or -h, --help). If you don't understand, don't use them. There are also many program instruction documents in the same - name txt file in their respective directories. Please figure it out upstairs. Others don't have the obligation to teach you what to do one - to - one. Many times, learning things depends on your own efforts.

I changed Chehui530's code a bit, and the function is basically realized, but I always feel it's not perfect.
If my those txt, bat file names are not numbers but random English letters, how should I write it then?
My content is as follows:
TEST.bat
------------------------
@echo off
:start
string a=add %b%,1
compfile d:\mods.log %a%.log /v /a /s
if errorlevel 128 goto bat
if errorlevel 64 goto reture
:reture
string b=add %b%,1
goto start
if %b%==101 goto end
:bat
call %a%.bat

:end

If it's random numbers, it's difficult

Re chenhui530:　　This is not an issue of random numbers, but an issue of file traversal. That is to say, the owner wants to implement comparison with log files of any names, which can be fully achieved with for. If the operation is relatively complex, you can Call its subroutine within for.　　As for comparison, FC can be fully used. Use FIND to find whether the output of FC contains the string of file non - existence difference. Haven't you already used it like this?　　So, this program can currently meet the owner's requirements without the assistance of third - party programs.

It seems that brother willsortwillsort can't complete it without using third-party tools! Maybe I'm limited in knowledge! Please brother willsortwillsort publish a perfect program for everyone to learn

willsort made a mistake this time. The fc in DOS 7.1 simply doesn't have such a function.

Re chenhui530:
A bit off. The key issue is obtaining the main filename of the file. This is difficult to do with for, so a file traversal loop is used instead.
Regarding file traversal, if you've carefully read my previous post about file traversal, you'll understand that this program is just a variation of those programs. They all utilize an algorithm for obtaining a string of words from a text file based on the address of lines, columns/words, that is, using debug to generate a command line prefix without carriage returns and then chaining it into the text for processing. Using this method, you can also obtain the file extension, full path, directory it's in, file size, date and time, file attributes, etc. Even the relative path that's hard to obtain under XP can be gotten, but the complexity and efficiency of the algorithm reduce its practicality. Thus, you can better understand my helplessness.
Re quan_zhou:
The program requires execution in the command line. Since your design requirements are not clear, command line parameters are used to determine the files to compare. For example:
cmprcall c:\x.txt d:\ log
This is comparing c:\x.txt with all .log files under d:\.
Some suggestions regarding your design intention: For target matching and execution, I suggest using a separate batch program instead of calling multiple batches based on matching. This can save hard disk space overhead and simplify the program to some extent. Of course, there are exceptions if you have special needs that must be implemented this way. Also, there are some issues with that test.bat, such as if %b%==101 goto end is never executed, and the variable %b% increments by 2 each time, etc.
Re climbing:
The FC in DOS/Win9x does not return errorlevel, but FIND does, so FIND can be used to identify the comparison result of FC. My early file traversal program used this, and Brother chenhui530 also used it in the program under NT environment, of course, that was unnecessary. I wonder if you have something else in mind?

:: CmprCall.bat - Compare one file with a group of files and execute the corresponding batch
:: Will Sort - 11:54 2005-3-24
:: The program has been slightly modified and can be used with other names
@echo off
if "%1"=="$" goto %2
if "%3"=="" goto end
set src=%1
:MakeList
dir %2.\*.%3 | find /i " %3 " >~visit.lst
:MakePreLine
echo %0 $ Compare > ~visit.pre
for %%c in (rcx 17 w q) do echo %%c>> ~visit.asd
debug ~visit.pre < ~visit.asd > nul
rem if == chcp 936 > nul
:LoopVisit
copy /a ~visit.pre+~visit.lst ~visit.bat > nul
call ~visit.bat
if not "%matched%"=="" goto Clear
find "%0 $ Compare " /v < ~visit.bat > ~visit.lst
goto LoopVisit
:Compare
if "%3"=="" set matched=!failed!
if "%3"=="" goto end
if not exist d:\%3.bat goto end
fc %src% d:\%3.%4 | find "FC: no differences encountered" >nul
if not errorlevel 1 call %3.bat
if not errorlevel 1 set matched=!success!
goto end
:Clear
del ~visit.*
set matched=
set src=
:End

To willsort, I don't know how to use DEBUG and really don't understand your program! Brother willsort, can you explain it?

Re willsort: Yes, I was wrong. I didn't notice that under DOS 7.1, fc will return the string "The files are identical (in English)" after comparing the same files. I thought there would be no return value. No wonder Willsort is a master! I'm really in awe!

Re chenhui530: No time to write much today, first give you a link to an old post: Batch processing for three file traversals (actually five)

Thank you very much for everyone's help!
I am currently digesting Brother WillSort's batch processing. There are too many places I don't understand. I'll first go to check the information because I'm too novice.
I'll ask everyone for help when I really can't digest it. Thank you all!