China DOS Union

It would be great if the pure DOS command interpreter could be as powerful as the CMD in 2K/XP someday

Been looking for this for a long time~` bump bump bump!!

I'm completely convinced... DOS commands are really powerful...

When I use the AT command to run a batch file on schedule, if the batch file contains FOR, it just never works.


for /f %%a in (to.txt) do del %%a /q

The to.txt file is in the current folder.

Every time it runs, it says it can't find the to.txt file. If I directly click the batch file to run it, there's no problem.

I don't know why... when called by at it just won't run successfully.....

Asking the experts, where is the problem?

c:\md yubin Such a simple batch file content made me unable to hold back and want to find someone to pour out my heartfelt joy. From c:\md yubin to IF for, how many detours I took, how much effort I went through, but in the end I was still tripped up by IF for. Asking some big brother or big sister who knows IF for to solve these two puzzles for me.
I don't want to ask people for help either, but I can't help it, who told me I'm so fond of dos. QQ 648620644
I've studied it for a long time and really just can't figure it out~~

Let me try replying to a post

Thanks for the OP's support

Thanks

I just tried:
for %a in (*.txt) do type %a

But if the filename contains spaces, for example:
001.txt
复件 001.txt

it can only display 001.txt, but can't display the contents of the file "复件 001.txt". How should it be modified?

Thanks a lot for sharing! I'm learning this now!

:P Sooner or later I'll learn this command

"for" is really too useful now. Unlike in the past, when I could only use goto for everything. Once a bat file went past 100 lines, I had no idea where goto was jumping anymore.

Learned something. Thanks.

Bump, I don't use for very brilliantly...

I've finally seen the true charm of the FOR command.
If only it could all be a bit more detailed. Then I'd have no problem learning DOS