China DOS Union

Just like Linux, DOS redevelopment also needs a group. I’m very happy to see the biggest Chinese DOS forum in the country becoming more and more prosperous, and I feel sincerely delighted. With the New Year approaching, I wish this forum continued success!!!

I’m a system enthusiast. I previously did in-depth research on Linux, and found that especially in China, DOS actually has more development potential than Linux. The vast majority of computer users can say a thing or two about DOS, but when it comes to Linux they can only shake their heads and give up.
For Linux to reach the desktop, it will take at least another 10 years. But DOS is different. DOS has a worldwide level of popularity unmatched by any operating system, and in addition there is a huge amount of accumulated experience and memories. It can be said with certainty that if some experts take the lead, DOS could completely take a development path similar to Linux. The key lies in how we enthusiasts position its future. Personally, I think the initial positioning of DOS is best as a disk maintenance platform with a user-friendly interface, and then go on to study its protected mode in depth, break through the 640K memory limit, make a GUI, and of course Chinese-localizing SEAL2.0 would also be possible. I’m starting this off here; if you’re willing to redevelop DOS together, please leave your E-mail.

Great, everyone come share your views too!

I also strongly agree. I'm very glad there are still so many people who love DOS, and I really hope more people will join the China DOS Union.

I am currently participating in a German Delphi for dos project.

I don't know what tools to use to develop DOS programs, and I don't know whether C is the ideal development tool

Lately, I've started to really like dos, but right now I'm still a newbie, so I'm not much use for developing dos. Still, I firmly support the DOS development alliance.

ye, support

I support it too!

I'm a newbie and can't help, but I absolutely support it. I think if we want to develop DOS, we should first develop a DOS system with GBK support. Looking forward to it...!

Good, support

Last time when I cracked a restore card, it was thanks to this, hahaha~~~ (my own internet café's)
DOS will forever be a treasure trove of knowledge in the IT world, waiting for more development and research from all you experts!

Last time when I cracked a restore card, it was thanks to it, hahaha~~~~(in my own internet café)
DOS will always be a rich treasure trove of knowledge in the IT world. In the days ahead, we'll still have to rely on all you experts for more development and research!

Have you people thought about the security issues of dos FAT16?
If we want to develop it, I think the file system won't pass muster. We'll have to come up with one even better than ext2.
I think aside from learning, there's really too little that can be used on dos, because in practical terms there isn't much left.
But I do have some affection for this too, it's just that I really don't have the ability.
Because just with the graphical interface alone, there's a whole lot we would have to do.
It can't be the same as other people's, and it has to be better than theirs too. That's really hard.

I'll leave an E_mail anyway: bjcx994@elong.com
Because to tell the truth this is what I love most, so as long as I have time I can join the development too.

Good ! Can I be part of it too?


anxuej@sohu.com