I had a discussion with WENGIER on QQ in the early hours this morning about the future development of China DOS Union. At WENGIER's request, I'm posting three important topics from it here, so that all members can take part in the discussion. I hope everyone can put forward some substantive opinions, and not just perfunctorily say you support it.
I declare here:
Those who don't come read this post are not being cool;
those who read it and don't reply are not being cool;
those who reply perfunctorily or with trash replies are also not being cool;
I ask every friend who has read this post to answer seriously. Thank you all for being cool enough.
1. About the boot disk
What kind of boot disk does everyone want China DOS Union to make? All kinds of boot disks in every possible style, each different from the next? Or one truly universal super boot disk that brings together the technical essence of China DOS Union and the hard work of all the experts? WENGIER and I both lean toward the latter. Our proposal is as follows:
Goal: to realize a super boot engine and a super DOS platform, integrating booting, maintenance, networking, and multimedia learning into one. To create a universal boot disk for a GUI super DOS system platform that truly combines the strengths of various DOS systems into one.
Specific projects:
1. Super boot engine project
2. GUI interface program project
3. Chinese character support system and software Chinese-localization project
4. Generic hardware driver project
5. Multimedia project
6. LAN and Internet project
Please give your opinions on the type of boot disk, or your views on the above projects, and say which project you plan to participate in. We hope enthusiastic members will also take part in the actual implementation of the projects. Everyone can also talk about the most ideal boot disk, projects, and project leaders in your mind.
2. About publishing a DOS book and a CDU first anniversary commemorative CD:
1. Do you think we should publish a book and a first anniversary commemorative CD? Should we charge a certain fee as funding for China DOS Union?
2. If so, how exactly should it be carried out (every friend can put forward ideas)?
3. How should the book and CD be distributed? Should the CD be burned, handled through pirates, or officially distributed together with the book? It would be best if friends who know this area could offer some practical and solid suggestions.
4. How many people would need the book and CD? Would they be welcomed by everyone? Please have every member help do some investigation.
3. About the future focus of the DOS Union:
WENGIER and I are not fully in agreement on this for the time being, so I'll just post the relevant QQ chat record here.
2003-07-14 00:32:36 Yiyesong
What have you been busy doing lately?
2003-07-14 01:31:43 Wengier
Researching MiniWin95B
2003-07-14 00:35:53 Yiyesong
I don't think it has much practical meaning. What's the point of making so many MINI boot disks? How many people are using WIN95 now anyway?
2003-07-14 01:35:22 Wengier
Win95B actually can't run on my computer either (it has compatibility problems itself). Recently I'm preparing to make MiniWin98SE.
2003-07-14 00:39:36 Yiyesong
I keep feeling that our forum still hasn't made any real breakthrough. Now it could almost be called the DOS Boot Disk Union. I think the main direction is wrong.
2003-07-14 01:39:16 Wengier
That makes sense. But how should we change it? After all, it seems the real experts still haven't come yet.
2003-07-14 00:44:00 Yiyesong
You've seen how posts have started to become saturated recently, right? There aren't any innovative posts anymore. There are a lot of posts that I don't even want to reply to after reading. It's all repetitive and low-level questions.
2003-07-14 01:44:01 Wengier
Exactly... I've had that feeling for a long time too. But I can't think of a good solution for the moment.
2003-07-14 00:48:21 Yiyesong
Start from programming. Even though our level still isn't good enough right now, we can take it slowly. Start with the simple things. For now let the boot disk section keep holding things up. But don't put the main energy into that anymore. The main energy should go into simple DOS software development, and we can also do some discussion of DOS programming. I don't think boot disk technology is going to make any further breakthroughs now.
Actually, you can see it yourself: your MINWIN32 isn't as popular as MSDOS71. To put it bluntly, users use boot disks to maintain systems.
2003-07-14 01:50:58 Wengier
But my msdos710 boot disk actually doesn't have that many system maintenance functions. After all, I didn't put many maintenance tools into it, just a small number of tools like BOOTPART and SRCTOOLS to pad it out a bit. What is really useful in the msdos710 boot disk is the other tools.
2003-07-14 00:56:53 Yiyesong
Hehe, they didn't use all of it as-is. They just used your boot techniques. Then they deleted the tools they didn't need and added the tools they did need. A lot of people do it that way. I don't think anyone is going to use CD-PLAY in a boot disk to listen to CDs.
2003-07-14 01:58:15 Wengier
Actually I wouldn't use CD-PLAY in a boot disk to listen to CDs either. I just thought it was very small and handy, and its functions were okay, so I included it.
Still, DOS boot techniques with the "China DOS Union"特色 are what really have value. As for what other software is in the boot disk, changing that is very easy. I think what matters is building a "super DOS platform".
The above are the three most important topics WENGIER and I discussed. I suggest making them one of the topics for this week's moderators' meeting. Since I can't get on MSN, I can't attend this week's moderators' meeting.
At the same time, I hope all members will participate in this work. Even if you can't do much, you can still put forward some good ideas and suggestions. I don't want to see any more painless nonsense like support, good, not bad, newbies are in luck, and so on.
When everyone is doing well, that's what really counts
I declare here:
Those who don't come read this post are not being cool;
those who read it and don't reply are not being cool;
those who reply perfunctorily or with trash replies are also not being cool;
I ask every friend who has read this post to answer seriously. Thank you all for being cool enough.
1. About the boot disk
What kind of boot disk does everyone want China DOS Union to make? All kinds of boot disks in every possible style, each different from the next? Or one truly universal super boot disk that brings together the technical essence of China DOS Union and the hard work of all the experts? WENGIER and I both lean toward the latter. Our proposal is as follows:
Goal: to realize a super boot engine and a super DOS platform, integrating booting, maintenance, networking, and multimedia learning into one. To create a universal boot disk for a GUI super DOS system platform that truly combines the strengths of various DOS systems into one.
Specific projects:
1. Super boot engine project
2. GUI interface program project
3. Chinese character support system and software Chinese-localization project
4. Generic hardware driver project
5. Multimedia project
6. LAN and Internet project
Please give your opinions on the type of boot disk, or your views on the above projects, and say which project you plan to participate in. We hope enthusiastic members will also take part in the actual implementation of the projects. Everyone can also talk about the most ideal boot disk, projects, and project leaders in your mind.
2. About publishing a DOS book and a CDU first anniversary commemorative CD:
1. Do you think we should publish a book and a first anniversary commemorative CD? Should we charge a certain fee as funding for China DOS Union?
2. If so, how exactly should it be carried out (every friend can put forward ideas)?
3. How should the book and CD be distributed? Should the CD be burned, handled through pirates, or officially distributed together with the book? It would be best if friends who know this area could offer some practical and solid suggestions.
4. How many people would need the book and CD? Would they be welcomed by everyone? Please have every member help do some investigation.
3. About the future focus of the DOS Union:
WENGIER and I are not fully in agreement on this for the time being, so I'll just post the relevant QQ chat record here.
2003-07-14 00:32:36 Yiyesong
What have you been busy doing lately?
2003-07-14 01:31:43 Wengier
Researching MiniWin95B
2003-07-14 00:35:53 Yiyesong
I don't think it has much practical meaning. What's the point of making so many MINI boot disks? How many people are using WIN95 now anyway?
2003-07-14 01:35:22 Wengier
Win95B actually can't run on my computer either (it has compatibility problems itself). Recently I'm preparing to make MiniWin98SE.
2003-07-14 00:39:36 Yiyesong
I keep feeling that our forum still hasn't made any real breakthrough. Now it could almost be called the DOS Boot Disk Union. I think the main direction is wrong.
2003-07-14 01:39:16 Wengier
That makes sense. But how should we change it? After all, it seems the real experts still haven't come yet.
2003-07-14 00:44:00 Yiyesong
You've seen how posts have started to become saturated recently, right? There aren't any innovative posts anymore. There are a lot of posts that I don't even want to reply to after reading. It's all repetitive and low-level questions.
2003-07-14 01:44:01 Wengier
Exactly... I've had that feeling for a long time too. But I can't think of a good solution for the moment.
2003-07-14 00:48:21 Yiyesong
Start from programming. Even though our level still isn't good enough right now, we can take it slowly. Start with the simple things. For now let the boot disk section keep holding things up. But don't put the main energy into that anymore. The main energy should go into simple DOS software development, and we can also do some discussion of DOS programming. I don't think boot disk technology is going to make any further breakthroughs now.
Actually, you can see it yourself: your MINWIN32 isn't as popular as MSDOS71. To put it bluntly, users use boot disks to maintain systems.
2003-07-14 01:50:58 Wengier
But my msdos710 boot disk actually doesn't have that many system maintenance functions. After all, I didn't put many maintenance tools into it, just a small number of tools like BOOTPART and SRCTOOLS to pad it out a bit. What is really useful in the msdos710 boot disk is the other tools.
2003-07-14 00:56:53 Yiyesong
Hehe, they didn't use all of it as-is. They just used your boot techniques. Then they deleted the tools they didn't need and added the tools they did need. A lot of people do it that way. I don't think anyone is going to use CD-PLAY in a boot disk to listen to CDs.
2003-07-14 01:58:15 Wengier
Actually I wouldn't use CD-PLAY in a boot disk to listen to CDs either. I just thought it was very small and handy, and its functions were okay, so I included it.
Still, DOS boot techniques with the "China DOS Union"特色 are what really have value. As for what other software is in the boot disk, changing that is very easy. I think what matters is building a "super DOS platform".
The above are the three most important topics WENGIER and I discussed. I suggest making them one of the topics for this week's moderators' meeting. Since I can't get on MSN, I can't attend this week's moderators' meeting.
At the same time, I hope all members will participate in this work. Even if you can't do much, you can still put forward some good ideas and suggestions. I don't want to see any more painless nonsense like support, good, not bad, newbies are in luck, and so on.
When everyone is doing well, that's what really counts
http://dos.e-stone.cn/dosbbs
uploadImages/200311161145850422.swf
uploadImages/200311161145850422.swf







