Is it necessary to make a batch processing interface?
[ Last edited by czl1378 on 2009-7-10 at 09:52 ]
[ Last edited by czl1378 on 2009-7-10 at 09:52 ]
China DOS Union
Union site: www.cn-dos.net Forum site: www.cn-dos.net/forum
DOS stands for freedom, openness and progress. Let us work hard, learn from the openness and GNU spirit of FreeDOS and Linux, and together build and grow a free GNU GPL world!
中国DOS联盟论坛 » DOS批处理 & 脚本技术（批处理室） » [Voting Closed] Should the batch processing interface be well done?
View 8,333 Replies 54
应该
44 votes · 61.1%
不应该
11 votes · 15.3%
不确定
17 votes · 23.6%
Original Poster
Posted 2009-04-04 00:27 · 中国 湖北 荆州 电信
Floor 2
Posted 2009-04-04 01:03 · 中国 北京 联通
银牌会员
★★★★
[b]看你妹啊[/b]
Credits 1,488
Posts 1,357
Joined 2006-05-20 12:00
20-year member
UID 55770
Posts 1,357
Joined 2006-05-20 12:00
20-year member
UID 55770
Status Offline
I am a selfish and stingy person, and what I chose is not right
I think the interface is always empty. Just write a script to complete the core functions you want. Considering the interface is just a waste of time and energy.
As for what the landlord wants to do, it is whatever, there is nothing right or wrong
HOHO
I think the interface is always empty. Just write a script to complete the core functions you want. Considering the interface is just a waste of time and energy.
As for what the landlord wants to do, it is whatever, there is nothing right or wrong
HOHO
有问题请发论坛或者自行搜索,再短消息问我的统统是SB
Floor 3
Posted 2009-04-04 01:14 · 中国 湖北 荆州 电信
I see that YISHANJU has been paying more attention to my post. Thanks for your vote. There's no such thing as self - ish or not. When I made a vote, I definitely wanted to see the real result. If those who choose "shouldn't" are considered selfish, then it's meaningless, right? To be honest, I'm in an uncertain state now.
Floor 4
Posted 2009-04-04 01:21 · 中国 北京 联通
银牌会员
★★★★
[b]看你妹啊[/b]
Credits 1,488
Posts 1,357
Joined 2006-05-20 12:00
20-year member
UID 55770
Posts 1,357
Joined 2006-05-20 12:00
20-year member
UID 55770
Status Offline
Misunderstanding, misunderstanding. I've been hanging out on the forum recently with nothing to do. I reply to new posts when I have nothing to do. The choice shouldn't be only for oneself, choosing only for oneself.
Phew
Phew
有问题请发论坛或者自行搜索,再短消息问我的统统是SB
Floor 5
Posted 2009-04-04 01:29 · 中国 湖北 荆州 电信
Could it be that one should still choose for others? Well, does it mean that?
Floor 6
Posted 2009-04-04 01:42 · 中国 湖南 长沙 电信
Floor 7
Posted 2009-04-04 03:02 · 中国 广东 东莞 电信
银牌会员
★★★
批处理编程迷
Credits 1,916
Posts 752
Joined 2008-12-28 04:30
17-year member
UID 135147
Gender Male
From 广西
Posts 752
Joined 2008-12-28 04:30
17-year member
UID 135147
Gender Male
From 广西
Status Offline
[Uncertain]
Of course, the more beautiful the better, but if too many resources or time are spent for a better interface, it should not be.
If the batch processing done is for personal use, it depends on personal preference!
Of course, the more beautiful the better, but if too many resources or time are spent for a better interface, it should not be.
If the batch processing done is for personal use, it depends on personal preference!
网志
Floor 8
Posted 2009-04-04 05:58 · 中国 广东 肇庆 德庆县 电信
Not sure. Practical is fine, the interface is good-looking, but it will occupy system resources, and instead it is not worth the cost.
Floor 9
Posted 2009-04-04 07:06 · 中国 重庆 电信
When your batch processing level can solve most of the problems in this section, then consider the so-called interface.
Floor 10
Posted 2009-04-04 09:25 · 中国 广东 江门 电信
中级用户
★★
Credits 338
Posts 175
Joined 2007-10-21 15:30
18-year member
UID 100351
Gender Male
Posts 175
Joined 2007-10-21 15:30
18-year member
UID 100351
Gender Male
Status Offline
Obviously a CLI, it's better to stay away from GUI...
Floor 11
Posted 2009-04-04 23:14 · 中国 广东 广州 电信
A practical attitude: should not be too fancy, spend more time to make the functions stronger and bigger
For the sake of showing off: want to have as many PLs as possible, in fact, making a good interface also has quite a lot of technical content
For the sake of showing off: want to have as many PLs as possible, in fact, making a good interface also has quite a lot of technical content
Floor 12
Posted 2009-04-05 04:11 · 中国 湖北 荆州 洪湖市 电信
It seems most people are relatively opposed.
Also, there are clearly many languages that can easily make very nice interfaces. Why waste time making interfaces in batch processing? It's a headache.
But should batch processing always be in a plain black-and-white interface and rely on user input for selection? That's too boring.
What are third-party command programs like COLR, ECHOX made for? Isn't it just to hope to improve the interface of batch processing?
Moderator HAT said: "When your batch processing level can solve most problems in this section, then consider the so-called interface."... Depressed, does a person with very basic batch processing have no right to make interfaces?
Well, I'm very depressed. A bit unwilling, hoping everyone can convince me.
Also, there are clearly many languages that can easily make very nice interfaces. Why waste time making interfaces in batch processing? It's a headache.
But should batch processing always be in a plain black-and-white interface and rely on user input for selection? That's too boring.
What are third-party command programs like COLR, ECHOX made for? Isn't it just to hope to improve the interface of batch processing?
Moderator HAT said: "When your batch processing level can solve most problems in this section, then consider the so-called interface."... Depressed, does a person with very basic batch processing have no right to make interfaces?
Well, I'm very depressed. A bit unwilling, hoping everyone can convince me.
Floor 13
Posted 2009-04-05 07:35 · 中国 广东 江门 电信
中级用户
★★
Credits 338
Posts 175
Joined 2007-10-21 15:30
18-year member
UID 100351
Gender Male
Posts 175
Joined 2007-10-21 15:30
18-year member
UID 100351
Gender Male
Status Offline
Those who can use search and lurk are not bad.
As for if you really want to touch the essence of cmd to modify the interface, technology is very important.
As for if you really want to touch the essence of cmd to modify the interface, technology is very important.
Floor 14
Posted 2009-04-05 09:49 · 中国 福建 三明 电信
The third option is better changed to "depending on the situation". Generally, the batch scripts I write are all without an interface, and they run and complete when double-clicked. Because batch scripts generally don't need interaction, at most files or directories are dragged and dropped onto the batch icon, and even then, an interface isn't needed. For example, batch - made games that need an interface, of course, the more beautiful the better. If interaction is really unavoidable, then we need to consider the readability and maintainability of the interface - related code. The beauty of the interface is secondary, as long as it is neat enough to understand.
┌───────┐
├→学习→实践→┤
└───────┘
├→学习→实践→┤
└───────┘
Floor 15
Posted 2009-04-05 10:02 · 中国 四川 泸州 联通
CMD is a free world, you can do what you want to do
Forum Jump: