I often discuss batch processing in the group. Some codes are directly posted, and when I copy them and save to a file, I find that all the content is squeezed into one line, and the carriage return places are occupied by annoying black blocks. There are as many black blocks as there are carriage returns. To test the code, I generally have to break lines manually, which is very troublesome. Do we just have to endure such torture?
Today in the group, someone asked me how to use batch processing to solve this problem. During the testing process, I accidentally discovered a very useful statement and share it with you:
Usage method: Save this code as a batch file that is not test.cmd, save the code copied from QQ in the test.txt file, run the above code, and then open test.cmd to see what? Hehe, is the code restored?
By extension, as long as it is content copied from QQ, this code can be used to restore it.
Don't ask me what the principle is, because I don't know either ^_^, but there is an article worth referring to. Please see: How to extract content on different lines
Today in the group, someone asked me how to use batch processing to solve this problem. During the testing process, I accidentally discovered a very useful statement and share it with you:
@echo off
more test.txt>test.cmd
Usage method: Save this code as a batch file that is not test.cmd, save the code copied from QQ in the test.txt file, run the above code, and then open test.cmd to see what? Hehe, is the code restored?
By extension, as long as it is content copied from QQ, this code can be used to restore it.
Don't ask me what the principle is, because I don't know either ^_^, but there is an article worth referring to. Please see: How to extract content on different lines
Recent Ratings for This Post
（ 2 in total）
Click for details
尺有所短，寸有所长，学好CMD没商量。
考虑问题复杂化，解决问题简洁化。
考虑问题复杂化，解决问题简洁化。
