Wengier 说：
hi
如是 说：
hi
Wengier 说：
他要哪个IO？
如是 说：
你的，改成显示98，不是71
Wengier 说：
哦，为什么呢？
Wengier 说：
98的LOGO都不在了，那就已经不是98的了。
如是 说：
说71不纯
Wengier 说：
71不纯？
如是 说：
他要做98的
如是 说：
不要你的logo
Wengier 说：
我没放LOGO在IO.SYS中呀，没LOGO.SYS就行了。
如是 说：
盘发上来了，看看
如是 说：
他不愿显示71字符
如是 说：
有个性哟
Wengier 说：
哦，看来我喜欢做DOS启动盘，他则不喜欢做DOS启动盘呀。
如是 说：
各有所好
Wengier 说：
那Win98启动盘最好放在“WIN及其它操作系统专栏”中。
如是 说：
你要抢我的生意？
Wengier 说：
什么意思？？
Wengier 说：
别这样嘛....
如是 说：
好不容易让他们都做启动盘
Wengier 说：
哦，，，，，
如是 说：
传上来
已将 浪花 添加到对话中。
Wengier 说：
浪花来了。
如是 说：
嗯
Wengier 说：
怎么不说话了？？
浪花 说：
来了~
浪花 说：
我到了有20分钟了吧
浪花 说：
说呢呀
浪花 说：
我在GOOGLE找SN呢
浪花 说：
LK是谁呀
如是 说：
严谨，细腻
Wengier 说：
我想知道，如果做win启动盘的话，那算不算“DOS启动盘”呢？
如是 说：
正是我所缺少的
Wengier 说：
要会配置，花点工夫。
Wengier 说：
我经常花几个小时研究配置。
如是 说：
只要是在dos下的，都算
浪花 说：
光盘还是软盘
Wengier 说：
那最好标明一下吧，否则别人还以为是WIN下的呢！
如是 说：
都是
如是 说：
有容乃大
浪花 说：
晕了~
浪花 说：
什么叫WIN下的
Wengier 说：
有人做WIN启动盘，别人还以为是WIN下的呢。
浪花 说：
没这么分的吧
如是 说：
我花整天时间研究
Wengier 说：
我最近仍在研究新启动技术
如是 说：
也没wengier的好
如是 说：
那一类
浪花 说：
WINDOWS启动盘?????
这么叫多晕呀~
Wengier 说：
我觉得还是叫DOS启动盘好，至少也要标明一下才行。
如是 说：
昏什么昏，dd说要踹你
浪花 说：
叫DOS启动盘...
这名字人家一看就知道是什么
浪花 说：
WIN启动盘..不好
Wengier 说：
是呀？别人会想“ＷＩＮ启动盘怎么放到ＤＯＳ论坛中去了呢”？
如是 说：
启动盘就启动盘
Wengier 说：
可是上面写的是“ＤＯＳ启动盘／ＬＯＧＯ技术”呀？！
如是 说：
什么win，dos的
Wengier 说：
那是不是整个名称也都得改呢？
如是 说：
dos是根本
浪花 说：
WIN启动盘,太不明确了!WIN2K/XP启动盘????
Wengier 说：
９４９４
Wengier 说：
ＤＯＳ启动嘛！！
浪花 说：
就叫DOS启动软盘,别叫WIN/.....
Wengier 说：
我们在ＤＯＳ论坛中是研究ＤＯＳ技术嘛，而不是ＷＩＮ技术。
如是 说：
那你怎么强调要能启动win
浪花 说：
对呀~~不能叫WIN呀
Wengier 说：
那是说ＤＯＳ启动盘和ＷＩＮ的关系，也就是说ＤＯＳ是根本，但不是专门用于启动ＷＩＮ的ＷＩＮ启动盘
如是 说：
这样说dos还是win的附属
Wengier 说：
不是呀，只是说ＤＯＳ启动盘启动后什么都能做，可以运行各种ＤＯＳ下的程序，例如ＷＩＮ。
Wengier 说：
ＷＩＮ、ＳＥＡＬ、ＱＵＢＥ等。
Wengier 说：
我试过的。
如是 说：
98以前，根本是dos的界面嘛
Wengier 说：
那ＷＩＮ3.1呢？
浪花 说：
不明白二位在讨论什么~
浪花 说：
晕啦~~~~~~
如是 说：
2000以后，启动盘也不能启动了
Wengier 说：
Win3.x不是ＤＯＳ程序吗？Win98还不是。
如是 说：
是啊
Wengier 说：
Win2K启动盘也不存在，那个只是Win2K应急恢复盘。
如是 说：
所以不必分界
Wengier 说：
说Win2K启动盘问题倒也不大，但ＤＯＳ启动盘就不能叫ＷＩＮ启动盘的。
浪花 说：
如是的意思是说WIN和DOS启动盘,没区别?
如是 说：
98以前都是dos的图形界面
Wengier 说：
什么意思？
Wengier 说：
Win９８是ＤＯＳ程序呀。
如是 说：
2000以后其实是nt
Wengier 说：
Win2000是NT 5.0
Wengier 说：
WinXP是NT 5.1
如是 说：
嗯
如是 说：
所以，正宗的win和dos没有分界
Wengier 说：
对呀，DOS 7.1启动盘是启动ＤＯＳ的，运行各种ＷＩＮ，包括3.x、9x都行，也能运行其它ＤＯＳ程序，例如ＳＥＡＬ、ＱＶ等的，那怎么能只叫ＷＩＮ启动盘呢，
浪花 说：
但别叫WIN启动盘的哈
浪花 说：
但别叫WIN启动盘的好
Wengier 说：
而且DOS 7.1是可以启动WinME的。
如是 说：
其实，2000以后就不是win了
Wengier 说：
2000也是ＷＩＮ，但却是WinNT系列的ＷＩＮ。
如是 说：
真正的win就是dos
浪花 说：
能启动WIN就叫WIN启动盘???
Wengier 说：
这样说也行，但是。。。
如是 说：
98以前的
Wengier 说：
ＤＯＳ 7.1启动盘能启动Win 3.2，那岂不是能叫Win3.2启动盘了？
如是 说：
win也是dos
浪花 说：
如是 说：
其实，2000以后就不是win了
有很多人可不这么认为
如是 说：
还是叫dos启动盘
Wengier 说：
ＤＯＳ ７。１启动盘都启动ＱＶ，那还不如叫ＱＶ启动盘得了。
Wengier 说：
对呀，ＤＯＳ ７。１就是ＤＯＳ启动盘，而不能叫ＷＩＮ启动盘。
如是 说：
启动win只是功能之一
浪花 说：
我看就叫DOS启动盘.别的不好...
Wengier 说：
没错！！
浪花 说：
如是 说：
启动win只是功能之一
9494
Wengier 说：
启动ＷＩＮ只是功能之一，所以不能叫ＷＩＮ启动盘。
如是 说：
benlaijiusi
如是 说：
本来就是
Wengier 说：
是呀，所以我们不能在ＤＯＳ启动盘版块中做ＷＩＮ启动盘。
浪花 说：
OK,意见统一了还讨论什么呀
Wengier 说：
启动ＷＩＮ只是功能之一。
浪花 说：
啊~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
如是 说：
也是dos呀
Wengier 说：
对呀，能启动ＷＩＮ是ＤＯＳ启动盘的功能之一。
浪花 说：
OK,意见统一了还讨论什么呀???
如是 说：
winme是80
Wengier 说：
好的，大家统一意见的。
如是 说：
win98是71
Wengier 说：
了。
浪花 说：
我的天~~~~~~~~~~这要干什么呀~
Wengier 说：
没错，Ｗin98是在DOS 7.1下运行的。
浪花 说：
是不是没完了呀~啊????
浪花 说：
意见都一致了~~~还讨论?????
如是 说：
你要干嘛？欠踹？
Wengier 说：
那规定一下，本论坛只做ＤＯＳ启动盘，而不做ＷＩＮ启动盘。
Wengier 说：
除了“ＷＩＮ及其它操作系统”版块以外。
如是 说：
不能这样讲
Wengier 说：
？？
浪花 说：
I 服 YOU
浪花 说：
是呀~~,就是DOS启动盘
如是 说：
会打消许多同仁的积极性的
浪花 说：
DOS启动盘,可以启动WIN(DOS内核)
如是 说：
慢慢引导
浪花 说：
名字叫,功能上来说可以启动(DOS内核)
如是 说：
嗯
Wengier 说：
是呀，我的那个“ＤＯＳ启动盘应能启动ＷＩＮ”就是这个意思。
如是 说：
认同
浪花 说：
这把意见不冲突呀~~那怎么还没完没了的说呀~~~哈哈
Wengier 说：
但Win98自带的ＤＯＳ 7.1启动盘则是哪个版本的ＷＩＮ都不能启动的，不管是3.2，还是98.
Wengier 说：
我的ＤＯＳ７。１启动盘则都可以。
如是 说：
我不认为me以前是win，都是dos
如是 说：
让wengier宣泄一下
浪花 说：
大家先听我一句成吗????
Wengier 说：
我的那个ＩＯ。ＳＹＳ连ＷＩＮ的ＬＯＧＯ都不存在了，与ＷＩＮ更没关系了。
浪花 说：
技术方面得事...不是由我们说了算的.....
如是 说：
难花，你说
浪花 说：
你们把框框条条都定好了...
浪花 说：
没用的
浪花 说：
客人不关心
如是 说：
在国内不都是这样吗？
浪花 说：
我认为,以客人为主
如是 说：
同意
浪花 说：
所以说,我们在这里讨论意义不大
如是 说：
中华传统
浪花 说：
具体情况具体分析
如是 说：
尊重来客
Wengier 说：
同意。
浪花 说：
有人问,咱们就帮助
如是 说：
不作限定
如是 说：
是啊
浪花 说：
对~
浪花 说：
不限制
如是 说：
我要做启动光盘，难花你帮帮我
Wengier 说：
我想问一下，我上回做的那个MiniWin 3.11启动盘是算ＤＯＳ启动，还是ＷＩＮ启动盘呢？
浪花 说：
爱说WIN就WIN,爱说DOS就DOS,一颗红心,二手(DOS/WIN)准备
Wengier 说：
是MS-DOS 7.10+WFW 3.11
如是 说：
同意
如是 说：
浪花的观点
Wengier 说：
是放在“ＤＯＳ启动盘”版块中好呢，还是放在“ＷＩＮ及其它操作系统专栏”中？
Wengier 说：
指我做的MiniWindows 3.11
如是 说：
win中
浪花 说：
DOS盘呀
浪花 说：
呵呵
Wengier 说：
到底是？
如是 说：
呵呵
浪花 说：
不一致了~~~~
浪花 说：
我听你的吧
如是 说：
win吧
浪花 说：
就WIN吧
Wengier 说：
哦，那就ＷＩＮ。ＷＩＮ启动盘就放在ＷＩＮ版块中。
如是 说：
墙头草呀
浪花 说：
不..........
Wengier 说：
？？
浪花 说：
我觉得还是放DOS区
如是 说：
是吗
如是 说：
为什么
浪花 说：
放DOS启动盘区
Wengier 说：
越看越糊涂了
浪花 说：
如果W做的这是的话,就放DOS区
如是 说：
是独立的系统，不再是启动盘了
浪花 说：
WIN区,留给人家讨论WINDOWS98/2K/XP....
如是 说：
wengier以为。。。。
Wengier 说：
３.x呢？
Wengier 说：
WIN3.x?
如是 说：
有一定道理
如是 说：
还是dos
如是 说：
根本就是嘛
Wengier 说：
那98也是ＤＯＳ呀。
如是 说：
是啊
浪花 说：
咱们这个WIN区,就和其它论坛一样,讨论WINDOWS9X/NT/2K/XP等....
Wengier 说：
ＮＴ系列才不是ＤＯＳ。
浪花 说：
别说98是DOS
如是 说：
所以我说不必分得
浪花 说：
咱们可以这么说.别人可....
Wengier 说：
如果说９８不是ＤＯＳ，那Win3.x是不是ＤＯＳ呢？
浪花 说：
既然有和就不能再把98说成DOS了
Wengier 说：
那3.x怎么办呢？
如是 说：
咱们要正视听，规条理
浪花 说：
3.X是个问题呀~~~~~~~~
如是 说：
me以前都是dos
Wengier 说：
这不是越说越糊涂了吗？
如是 说：
可以在论坛著文讨论
浪花 说：
那人家要是有WIN98的问题,你让人家到DOS区去问,不区WIN区????
Wengier 说：
怎么办呢？
Wengier 说：
如果ＷＩＮ９８问题是在ＷＩＮ区问，那ＷＩＮ９８启动盘是不是也应该在ＷＩＮ区问呢？
如是 说：
我说win区就不要了
Wengier 说：
莫老师说要ＷＩＮ区的。
如是 说：
只保留其他系统区
Wengier 说：
他说“水至清则无鱼”。
浪花 说：
改名字
如是 说：
包含win
Wengier 说：
本来就是“ＷＩＮ及基它操作系统专栏”呀。
如是 说：
行不行？
Wengier 说：
没变化呀。
如是 说：
去掉win
Wengier 说：
去掉？莫老师不会同意哦。
如是 说：
问问
浪花 说：
去掉不好
如是 说：
怎么不好？
Wengier 说：
去掉的话人气会低些的。
浪花 说：
这事不大,还挺麻烦的呀~~
如是 说：
不是有其他系统吗？
Wengier 说：
如果去掉的话，里面的帖子怎么办？
浪花 说：
Wengier 说：
去掉的话人气会低些的。
94呀~~
Wengier 说：
ＷＩＮ区还是不能去掉。
浪花 说：
别去掉呀
如是 说：
分类
Wengier 说：
那不是有点掀宾夺主的感觉了，就像ＤＯＳ之家那样了。
如是 说：
都归于其他系统，包含win
Wengier 说：
现在的“ＷＩＮ及其它操作系统”专栏就是这样的呀。
Wengier 说：
ＵＮＩＸ、ＬＩＮＵＸ、ＷＩＮ等的帖子都有的。
如是 说：
相对与dos来说，应该是这样啊
浪花 说：
怎么办好呀??
如是 说：
都是其他
Wengier 说：
这样呀，那ＷＩＮ启动盘不就应该放在ＷＩＮ区中了吗？
浪花 说：
不放WIN区的好
如是 说：
win启动盘是dos内核
如是 说：
全是dos文件呢
Wengier 说：
那ＷＩＮ９８的问题也不应该放在ＤＯＳ区中了吗？都是ＤＯＳ内核呀。
Wengier 说：
如果全是ＤＯＳ文件的话，那怎么能叫ＷＩＮ启动盘呢？
浪花 说：
呵呵??????
Wengier呀~~~你让我说什么好呀
如是 说：
暂时在其他系统区，我们在论坛讨论后。。。。
Wengier 说：
好，那就说如果是ＷＩＮ方面的问题的话，就放在ＷＩＮ区。
浪花 说：
我的意思是.就先这么着不动.
Wengier 说：
Win3.x呢？
如是 说：
女孩子，是这样
浪花 说：
3X我说不好
Wengier 说：
嘻嘻。。。。。
浪花 说：
二位说吧
Wengier 说：
那怎么办呢？
如是 说：
水至清则无鱼
浪花 说：
放WIN区吧
Wengier 说：
分类还是得有的。如果是ＷＩＮ的方面的话，一律放在ＷＩＮ区。
浪花 说：
如是 说：
水至清则无鱼
打算浑水摸鱼????
如是 说：
来宾爱放哪儿放那儿
Wengier 说：
这个呀？
浪花 说：
WIN3.X是WIN就放WIN吧
如是 说：
怎么？
浪花 说：
如是 说：
来宾爱放哪儿放那儿
也对~~~~~~~~
Wengier 说：
就是说Win3.x启动盘放在ＷＩＮ区吧，对吗？
如是 说：
拦得住他们？
浪花 说：
这WIN3.X就随客人啦~~~
Wengier 说：
Win98启动盘也最好放在ＷＩＮ区。
Wengier 说：
放在ＤＯＳ区的话，那只好。。。
如是 说：
怎么
Wengier 说：
我们来移动也行的。
Wengier 说：
移动帖子。
如是 说：
不必
浪花 说：
我是说放WIN区.但DOS区有人问WIN3.X也可以.
浪花 说：
不移动的好,动了人家找不着了..
如是 说：
他们找不到帖子，就没兴趣啦
Wengier 说：
不过这样一来分类不就有点乱了？
浪花 说：
例如我吧~~~就会找不着的~~~呵呵
浪花 说：
不乱~~~~~~~
如是 说：
暂时只能这样了
浪花 说：
没有一个论坛是分的特别清楚的
Wengier 说：
同是Win3.x，有人在ＤＯＳ区问，有人在ＷＩＮ区问，这怎么好呢？
如是 说：
十论坛吗
浪花 说：
都可以呀
如是 说：
就应该热闹一点
浪花 说：
9494热闹就好
Wengier 说：
我们到时把谈话内容帖到论坛上去吧，让大家也看看。
如是 说：
好的
如是 说：
这就办吧
浪花 说：
这没必要吧~~~~~~
Wengier 说：
？？
浪花 说：
这点小事也~~~~~~~
Wengier 说：
整理一下帖主要的也行。
浪花 说：
有不是什么重大决定~
如是 说：
浪花，
浪花 说：
啊~~叫我
如是 说：
民主嘛
Wengier 说：
还是公告一下分类方法，不过不是硬性规定就行了。
Wengier 说：
这样好管理和浏览些。
如是 说：
以发贴的形式讨论才好
浪花 说：
我是觉得这对客人来说关系不大~~所以~~~~
如是 说：
不需贴了吧，浪花说得有道理
浪花 说：
要是关系到客人的事,就必需发贴了~~~~~
如是 说：
嗯‘
Wengier 说：
因为大家看，我把Win3.x启动盘都放在了ＷＩＮ区中，Win9x启动盘不是更应放在ＷＩＮ区中了吗？而Win9x只能在ＷＩＮ区
Wengier said:
hi
Ru Shi said:
hi
Wengier said:
Which IO does he want?
Ru Shi said:
Yours, change it to display 98, not 71
Wengier said:
Oh, why?
Wengier said:
The logo of 98 is gone, then it's no longer 98.
Ru Shi said:
Saying 71 is not pure
Wengier said:
71 is not pure?
Ru Shi said:
He wants to make 98
Ru Shi said:
Don't want your logo
Wengier said:
I didn't put the logo in IO.SYS, just no LOGO.SYS.
Ru Shi said:
The disk has been uploaded, take a look
Ru Shi said:
He doesn't want to display the 71 character
Ru Shi said:
Have personality
Wengier said:
Oh, it seems I like making DOS boot disks, but he doesn't like making DOS boot disks.
Ru Shi said:
Everyone has their own preferences
Wengier said:
Then the Win98 boot disk should best be placed in the "WIN and Other Operating Systems Column".
Ru Shi said:
Are you going to steal my business?
Wengier said:
What do you mean??
Wengier said:
Don't be like that....
Ru Shi said:
Finally got them all to make boot disks
Wengier said:
Oh,,,,,,
Ru Shi said:
Upload it
Has added Lang Hua to the conversation.
Wengier said:
Lang Hua is here.
Ru Shi said:
Hmm
Wengier said:
Why aren't you talking??
Lang Hua said:
I'm here~
Lang Hua said:
I've been here for about 20 minutes
Lang Hua said:
Speak up
Lang Hua said:
I'm looking for SN on GOOGLE
Lang Hua said:
Who is LK
Ru Shi said:
Rigorous, meticulous
Wengier said:
I want to know, if making a win boot disk, then does it count as a "DOS boot disk"?
Ru Shi said:
Exactly what I'm lacking
Wengier said:
Need to configure, take some time.
Wengier said:
I often spend hours researching configurations.
Ru Shi said:
As long as it's under dos, it counts
Lang Hua said:
CD or floppy
Wengier said:
Then it's best to mark it, otherwise others might think it's under WIN!
Ru Shi said:
Both
Ru Shi said:
Inclusion is great
Lang Hua said:
Confused~
Lang Hua said:
What do you mean under WIN
Wengier said:
Someone makes a WIN boot disk, others might think it's under WIN.
Lang Hua said:
There's no such division
Ru Shi said:
I spend all day researching
Wengier said:
I'm still researching new boot technologies recently
Ru Shi said:
Not as good as Wengier's
Ru Shi said:
Which category
Lang Hua said:
WINDOWS boot disk?????
How confusing to call it that~
Wengier said:
I think it's better to call it a DOS boot disk, at least it should be marked.
Ru Shi said:
Why are you confused, dd said he's going to kick you
Lang Hua said:
Call it a DOS boot disk...
People will know what it is at a glance
Lang Hua said:
WIN boot disk.. not good
Wengier said:
Yeah? Others might think "Why put a WIN boot disk in the DOS forum"?
Ru Shi said:
Just boot disk
Wengier said:
But the name above is "DOS Boot Disk/LOGO Technology"?!
Ru Shi said:
What win, dos
Wengier said:
Then does the entire name need to be changed?
Ru Shi said:
DOS is fundamental
Lang Hua said:
WIN boot disk, too unclear! WIN2K/XP boot disk????
Wengier said:
Exactly
Wengier said:
DOS boot!
Lang Hua said:
Just call it a DOS boot floppy, don't call it WIN/.....
Wengier said:
We are researching DOS technology in the DOS forum, not WIN technology.
Ru Shi said:
Then why do you emphasize being able to boot win
Lang Hua said:
Right~~ Can't call it WIN
Wengier said:
That's talking about the relationship between DOS boot disk and WIN, that is, DOS is fundamental, but it's not a WIN boot disk specifically for booting WIN
Ru Shi said:
So is DOS an accessory to WIN
Wengier said:
No, it's just that a DOS boot disk can do anything after booting, can run various DOS programs, such as WIN.
Wengier said:
WIN, SEAL, QUBE, etc.
Wengier said:
I've tried it.
Ru Shi said:
Before 98, it was basically a DOS interface
Wengier said:
What about Win3.1?
Lang Hua said:
Don't understand what the two of you are discussing~
Lang Hua said:
Confused~~~~~~
Ru Shi said:
After 2000, the boot disk can't boot anymore
Wengier said:
Win3.x isn't a DOS program? Win98 isn't either.
Ru Shi said:
Yeah
Wengier said:
Win2K boot disk doesn't exist either, that's just Win2K emergency recovery disk.
Ru Shi said:
So no need to divide
Wengier said:
Saying Win2K boot disk is okay, but a DOS boot disk can't be called a WIN boot disk.
Lang Hua said:
Ru Shi means that there's no difference between WIN and DOS boot disks?
Ru Shi said:
Before 98, they were all DOS graphical interfaces
Wengier said:
What do you mean?
Wengier said:
Win 98 is a DOS program.
Ru Shi said:
After 2000, it's actually NT
Wengier said:
Win2000 is NT 5.0
Wengier said:
WinXP is NT 5.1
Ru Shi said:
Hmm
Ru Shi said:
So, there's no division between authentic win and dos
Wengier said:
Right, a DOS 7.1 boot disk is for booting DOS, running various WINs, including 3.x, 9x, etc., and can also run other DOS programs, such as SEAL, QV, etc., so how can it be called a WIN boot disk,
Lang Hua said:
But don't call it a WIN boot disk
Lang Hua said:
But it's better not to call it a WIN boot disk
Wengier said:
And a DOS 7.1 can boot WinME.
Ru Shi said:
Actually, after 2000, it's not win
Wengier said:
2000 is also WIN, but it's the WinNT series of WIN.
Ru Shi said:
The real win is dos
Lang Hua said:
Can boot WIN and call it a WIN boot disk???
Wengier said:
That's also okay, but...
Ru Shi said:
Before 98
Wengier said:
A DOS 7.1 boot disk can boot Win 3.2, then can it be called a Win3.2 boot disk?
Ru Shi said:
Win is also dos
Lang Hua said:
Ru Shi said:
Actually, after 2000, it's not win
Many people don't think so
Ru Shi said:
Still call it a dos boot disk
Wengier said:
A DOS 7.1 boot disk can boot QV, then it's better to call it a QV boot disk.
Wengier said:
Right, a DOS 7.1 is a DOS boot disk, not a WIN boot disk.
Ru Shi said:
Booting win is just one of the functions
Lang Hua said:
I think just call it a DOS boot disk. The others are not good...
Wengier said:
Exactly!
Lang Hua said:
Ru Shi said:
Booting win is just one of the functions
Exactly
Wengier said:
Booting WIN is just one of the functions, so it can't be called a WIN boot disk.
Ru Shi said:
benlaijiusi
Ru Shi said:
Originally
Wengier said:
Yeah, so we can't make WIN boot disks in the DOS boot disk section.
Lang Hua said:
OK, the opinions are unified, why discuss anymore
Wengier said:
Booting WIN is just one of the functions.
Lang Hua said:
Ah~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ru Shi said:
Also dos
Wengier said:
Right, being able to boot WIN is one of the functions of a DOS boot disk.
Lang Hua said:
OK, the opinions are unified, why discuss anymore???
Ru Shi said:
Winme is 80
Wengier said:
Okay, everyone is unified.
Ru Shi said:
Win98 is 71
Wengier said:
Of.
Lang Hua said:
Oh my god~~~~~~~~~~ What is this going to do~
Wengier said:
没错，Win98 is run under DOS 7.1.
Lang Hua said:
Is it endless? Ah????
Lang Hua said:
The opinions are all unified~~~ Still discussing?????
Ru Shi said:
What are you going to do? Owe a kick?
Wengier said:
Then set a rule, this forum only makes DOS boot disks, not WIN boot disks.
Wengier said:
Except for the "WIN and Other Operating Systems" section.
Ru Shi said:
Can't say that
Wengier said:
??
Lang Hua said:
I服YOU
Lang Hua said:
Yeah~~, it's a DOS boot disk
Ru Shi said:
It will dampen the enthusiasm of many colleagues
Lang Hua said:
A DOS boot disk can boot WIN (DOS kernel)
Ru Shi said:
Guide slowly
Lang Hua said:
In terms of name, it can boot (DOS kernel) functionally
Ru Shi said:
Hmm
Wengier said:
Yeah, my "DOS boot disk should be able to boot WIN" means this.
Ru Shi said:
Agree
Lang Hua said:
There's no conflict in opinions~~ Then why keep talking endlessly~~~ Haha
Wengier said:
But the Win98自带的DOS 7.1 boot disk can't boot any version of WIN, whether it's 3.2 or 98.
Wengier said:
My DOS 7.1 boot disk can do it all.
Ru Shi said:
I don't think before me are win, they are all dos
Ru Shi said:
Let Wengier vent
Lang Hua said:
Can everyone listen to me for a moment????
Wengier said:
My IO.SYS doesn't even have the WIN logo, has nothing to do with WIN.
Lang Hua said:
Technical matters... it's not up to us to decide.....
Ru Shi said:
Nan Hua, you say
Lang Hua said:
You've set all the rules...
Lang Hua said:
It's useless
Lang Hua said:
Guests don't care
Ru Shi said:
Isn't this the case in China?
Lang Hua said:
I think, put guests first
Ru Shi said:
Agree
Lang Hua said:
So discussing here is of little significance
Ru Shi said:
Chinese tradition
Lang Hua said:
Specific situations, specific analysis
Ru Shi said:
Respect guests
Wengier said:
Agree.
Lang Hua said:
If someone asks, we'll help
Ru Shi said:
Don't limit
Ru Shi said:
Yeah
Lang Hua said:
Right~
Lang Hua said:
Don't limit
Ru Shi said:
I want to make a boot CD, Nan Hua, help me
Wengier said:
I want to ask, was the MiniWin 3.11 boot disk I made before considered a DOS boot or a WIN boot disk?
Lang Hua said:
Love to say WIN is WIN, love to say DOS is DOS, one heart, two hands (DOS/WIN) ready
Wengier said:
It's MS-DOS 7.10+WFW 3.11
Ru Shi said:
Agree
Ru Shi said:
Lang Hua's view
Wengier said:
Is it better to put it in the "DOS Boot Disk" section or in the "WIN and Other Operating Systems Column"?
Wengier said:
Refers to the MiniWindows 3.11 I made
Ru Shi said:
In win
Lang Hua said:
DOS disk
Lang Hua said:
Hehe
Wengier said:
到底是？
Ru Shi said:
Hehe
Lang Hua said:
Disagreed~~~~
Lang Hua said:
I'll listen to you
Ru Shi said:
In win
Lang Hua said:
Just WIN
Wengier said:
Oh, then WIN. WIN boot disks should be placed in the WIN section.
Ru Shi said:
Fence-sitter
Lang Hua said:
No..........
Wengier said:
??
Lang Hua said:
I think it's still placed in the DOS area
Ru Shi said:
Is that so
Ru Shi said:
Why
Lang Hua said:
Place it in the DOS boot disk area
Wengier said:
More and more confused
Lang Hua said:
If W made this, put it in the DOS area
Ru Shi said:
It's an independent system, no longer a boot disk
Lang Hua said:
WIN area, leave it for others to discuss WINDOWS98/2K/XP....
Ru Shi said:
Wengier thinks...
Wengier said:
3.x?
Wengier said:
WIN3.x?
Ru Shi said:
Certainly makes sense
Ru Shi said:
Still dos
Ru Shi said:
Fundamentally
Wengier said:
Then 98 is also DOS.
Ru Shi said:
Yeah
Lang Hua said:
Our WIN area, just like other forums, discuss WINDOWS9X/NT/2K/XP, etc....
Wengier said:
NT series are not DOS.
Lang Hua said:
Don't say 98 is DOS
Ru Shi said:
So I said no need to divide
Lang Hua said:
We can say that. Others can....
Wengier said:
If 98 is not DOS, then is Win3.x DOS?
Lang Hua said:
Since there is and, then can't say 98 is DOS anymore
Wengier said:
What about 3.x?
Ru Shi said:
We need to correct the understanding and be orderly
Lang Hua said:
3.X is a problem~~~~~~~~
Ru Shi said:
Before me were all dos
Wengier said:
This is getting more and more confusing
Ru Shi said:
Can discuss in the forum
Lang Hua said:
Then if someone has a Win98 problem, do you let them ask in the DOS area, not the WIN area????
Wengier said:
What to do?
Wengier said:
If a WIN98 problem is asked in the WIN area, then should the WIN98 boot disk also be asked in the WIN area?
Ru Shi said:
I say remove the WIN area
Wengier said:
Teacher Mo said to have the WIN area.
Ru Shi said:
Just keep the other systems area
Wengier said:
He said "Water is too clear has no fish".
Lang Hua said:
Change the name
Ru Shi said:
Include win
Wengier said:
It's originally "WIN and Other Operating Systems Column".
Ru Shi said:
Will it work?
Wengier said:
No change.
Ru Shi said:
Remove win
Wengier said:
Remove? Teacher Mo won't agree.
Ru Shi said:
Ask
Lang Hua said:
It's not good to remove
Ru Shi said:
Why not?
Wengier said:
The popularity will be lower if removed.
Lang Hua said:
This matter is not big, but quite troublesome~~
Ru Shi said:
Aren't there other systems?
Wengier said:
What about the posts inside if removed?
Lang Hua said:
Wengier said:
The popularity will be lower if removed.
Exactly~~
Wengier said:
The WIN area still can't be removed.
Lang Hua said:
Don't remove
Ru Shi said:
Classify
Wengier said:
That would be a bit like seizing the main position, just like DOS Home.
Ru Shi said:
All belong to other systems, include win
Wengier said:
The current "WIN and Other Operating Systems" column is like this.
Wengier said:
Posts about UNIX, LINUX, WIN, etc. are all there.
Ru Shi said:
Relatively to dos, it should be like this
Lang Hua said:
What to do~~~~~~
Ru Shi said:
All others
Wengier said:
In this case, shouldn't the WIN boot disk be placed in the WIN area?
Lang Hua said:
Better not to put it in the WIN area
Ru Shi said:
The win boot disk is DOS kernel
Ru Shi said:
All are DOS files
Wengier said:
Then the Win98 problem shouldn't be placed in the DOS area either? All are DOS kernels.
Wengier said:
If all are DOS files, then how can it be called a WIN boot disk?
Lang Hua said:
Hehe??????
Wengier呀~~~ What can I say to you
Ru Shi said:
Temporarily in the other systems area, after we discuss in the forum....
Wengier said:
Okay, then say that if it's a WIN-related problem, put it in the WIN area.
Lang Hua said:
I mean, just leave it as it is for now.
Wengier said:
Win3.x?
Ru Shi said:
Girl, it's like this
Lang Hua said:
I can't say well about 3X
Wengier said:
Hehe. . . . . .
Lang Hua said:
You two say
Wengier said:
Then what to do?
Ru Shi said:
Water is too clear has no fish
Lang Hua said:
Put it in the WIN area
Wengier said:
Classification still needs to be there. If it's about WIN, put it all in the WIN area.
Lang Hua said:
Ru Shi said:
Water is too clear has no fish
Planning to fish in troubled waters????
Ru Shi said:
Guests can put it wherever they like
Wengier said:
This?
Lang Hua said:
WIN3.X is WIN, put it in WIN
Ru Shi said:
How?
Lang Hua said:
Ru Shi said:
Guests can put it wherever they like
Also right~~~~~~~~
Wengier said:
Does that mean the Win3.x boot disk is placed in the WIN area?
Ru Shi said:
Can you stop them?
Lang Hua said:
This WIN3.X is up to the guest~~
Wengier said:
The Win98 boot disk is also best placed in the WIN area.
Wengier said:
If placed in the DOS area, then只好....
Ru Shi said:
How
Wengier said:
We can also move it.
Wengier said:
Move the post.
Ru Shi said:
No need
Lang Hua said:
I mean put it in the WIN area. But if someone asks about WIN3.X in the DOS area, it's also okay.
Lang Hua said:
Better not to move, others won't find it..
Ru Shi said:
If they can't find the post, they'll lose interest
Wengier said:
But then the classification will be a bit messy?
Lang Hua said:
For example me~~~ I'll lose track~~~ Hehe
Lang Hua said:
Not messy~~~~~~~
Ru Shi said:
Can only be like this for now
Lang Hua said:
No forum is particularly clear
Wengier said:
Same Win3.x, some ask in the DOS area, some in the WIN area, how is this good?
Ru Shi said:
Ten forums?
Lang Hua said:
All can
Ru Shi said:
Should be lively
Lang Hua said:
Exactly lively is good
Wengier said:
We'll post the conversation on the forum later, let everyone see.
Ru Shi said:
Okay
Ru Shi said:
Let's do it
Lang Hua said:
This is unnecessary~~~~~~
Wengier said:
??
Lang Hua said:
This little thing also~~~~~~~
Wengier said:
It's okay to sort out the main points.
Lang Hua said:
It's not a major decision~
Ru Shi said:
Lang Hua,
Lang Hua said:
Ah~~ call me
Ru Shi said:
Democratic
Wengier said:
Still announce the classification method, but not a hard rule.
Wengier said:
This is better for management and browsing.
Ru Shi said:
It's better to discuss in the form of a post
Lang Hua said:
I think it doesn't matter much to guests~~ So~~~~
Ru Shi said:
No need to post, Lang Hua has a point
Lang Hua said:
If it's related to guests' matters, it's necessary to post~~~~~
Ru Shi said:
Hmm‘
Wengier said:
Because everyone sees, I put the Win3.x boot disk all in the WIN area, and the Win9x boot disk should be placed in the WIN area even more, and Win9x can only be in the WIN area
