|
walu
高级用户
积分 916
发帖 201
注册 2003-5-4
状态 离线
|
『楼 主』:
分区软件中FDISK最稳定！？
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
有人说用PQmagic、DM、DISKGEN等对硬盘分区后，当分区中的数据比较多时，就会出现这样或那样及兼容问题，只有用微软的FDISK才不会出现这样的情况。而据我所知，FDISK分区很慢，因为它在进行硬盘表面检测，而其它软件就跳过了这个检测就快多了，其实新硬盘的话就没必要表面检测的。
大家根据自己的实践说说究竟是不是只有FDISK分区才稳定？
Some people say that after partitioning the hard disk with PQmagic, DM, DISKGEN, etc., when there is a large amount of data in the partition, various compatibility problems will occur. Only using Microsoft's FDISK will not have such situations. But as far as I know, FDISK partitions very slowly because it performs a surface check of the hard disk, while other software skips this check and is much faster. In fact, for a new hard disk, there is no need for a surface check.
Everyone, based on your own practice, tell us whether it is really only FDISK partitioning that is stable?
|
|
 2004-2-28 00:00 |
|
|
defrag
中级用户
痴迷ＤＯＳ者
积分 456
发帖 570
注册 2004-10-9
状态 离线
|
『第 2 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
fdisk说是分区检测，但是它在擦数据聚居
fdisk is said to be for partition detection, but it's overwriting data clusters
|
DOS不是万能的，没有DOS是万万不能的
自古系统谁无死？留取胆清照汗青!uploadImages/20035317345478982.png |
|
|
2004-11-21 00:00 |
|
|
defrag
中级用户
痴迷ＤＯＳ者
积分 456
发帖 570
注册 2004-10-9
状态 离线
|
『第 3 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
还是fdisk和gdisk比较稳定
Still, fdisk and gdisk are relatively stable
|
DOS不是万能的，没有DOS是万万不能的
自古系统谁无死？留取胆清照汗青!uploadImages/20035317345478982.png |
|
|
2004-11-21 00:00 |
|
|
cn_archer
元老会员
农民
积分 2903
发帖 991
注册 2003-7-23
来自 福建省
状态 离线
|
『第 4 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
新硬盘，我用DM或PQ。有问题的硬盘，更要用DM或PQ，我遇到的几块硬盘，FDISK根本分不过去，用DM或PQ忽略坏道检查后分完区，还能将就着用。
New hard drives, I use DM or PQ. For problematic hard drives, I also use DM or PQ. The several hard drives I encountered, FDISK simply couldn't partition them. After using DM or PQ to ignore the bad sector check and then partition, they can still be used somewhat.
|
艰难奋长戟，万古用一夫
中国DOS联盟 http://www.cn-dos.net 欢迎大家来共同学习
我的MSN&E-Mail cn_archer@hotmail.com QQ 56049418
|
|
|
2004-11-22 00:00 |
|
|
yvhihdhq
初级用户
积分 190
发帖 16
注册 2004-1-25
状态 离线
|
『第 5 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
新硬盘最好用fdisk分区
It is best to use fdisk to partition a new hard disk
|
|
|
2004-11-24 00:00 |
|
|
cn_archer
元老会员
农民
积分 2903
发帖 991
注册 2003-7-23
来自 福建省
状态 离线
|
『第 6 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
一般来说，买了个新硬盘时，我会弄个该品牌硬盘的检测工具来检查一下是否有坏道，有坏道就不用说了。没坏道用什么软件来分区都无所谓。不过FDISK实在是太慢了，尤其是在分２５０G的硬盘时……
Generally speaking, when I buy a new hard drive, I will get a detection tool of that brand of hard drive to check for bad sectors. Need I say more if there are bad sectors? It doesn't matter what software I use to partition if there are no bad sectors. But FDISK is really too slow, especially when partitioning a 250G hard drive...
|
艰难奋长戟，万古用一夫
中国DOS联盟 http://www.cn-dos.net 欢迎大家来共同学习
我的MSN&E-Mail cn_archer@hotmail.com QQ 56049418
|
|
|
2004-11-25 00:00 |
|
|
bush
银牌会员
积分 2165
发帖 730
注册 2004-4-21
状态 离线
|
『第 7 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我的看法也是：新硬盤用fdisk，有問題的用：DG、DM
My view is also: For a new hard drive, use fdisk; for problematic ones, use: DG, DM
|
|
|
2004-11-27 00:00 |
|
|
defrag
中级用户
痴迷ＤＯＳ者
积分 456
发帖 570
注册 2004-10-9
状态 离线
|
『第 8 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
以下是引用cn_archer在2004-11-22 10:36:10的发言：
新硬盘，我用DM或PQ。
有问题的硬盘，更要用DM或PQ，我遇到的几块硬盘，FDISK根本分不过去，用DM或PQ忽略坏道检查后分完区，还能将就着用。
FDISK /ACTOK
The following is a quote from cn_archer's post on 2004-11-22 10:36:10:
New hard drive, I use DM or PQ.
For problematic hard drives, I also use DM or PQ. I encountered several hard drives where FDISK simply couldn't partition them. After using DM or PQ to ignore bad sector checks and then partitioning, they can still be used temporarily.
FDISK /ACTOK
|
DOS不是万能的，没有DOS是万万不能的
自古系统谁无死？留取胆清照汗青!uploadImages/20035317345478982.png |
|
|
2004-12-19 00:00 |
|
|
qingfengxvlai
初级用户
积分 114
发帖 6
注册 2005-1-3
状态 离线
|
『第 9 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
以下是引用cn_archer在2004-11-22 10:36:10的发言：
新硬盘，我用DM或PQ。
有问题的硬盘，更要用DM或PQ，我遇到的几块硬盘，FDISK根本分不过去，用DM或PQ忽略坏道检查后分完区，还能将就着用。
The following is the statement made by cn_archer on November 22, 2004 at 10:36:10:
For a new hard drive, I use DM or PQ.
For a problematic hard drive, I also use DM or PQ. I have encountered several hard drives where FDISK simply cannot partition them. After ignoring the bad sector check and partitioning with DM or PQ, they can still be used for the time being.
|
|
|
2005-1-11 00:00 |
|
|
sanmou
初级用户
积分 106
发帖 3
注册 2005-1-16
状态 离线
|
『第 10 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
以下是引用cn_archer在2004-11-25 0:53:20的发言：
一般来说，买了个新硬盘时，我会弄个该品牌硬盘的检测工具来检查一下是否有坏道，有坏道就不用说了。
没坏道用什么软件来分区都无所谓。
不过FDISK实在是太慢了，尤其是在分２５０G的硬盘时……
然.象希捷用seatools,IBM用DFT检测.之后用DM快分,然后装了WINOWS到系统里格式化.象2000,XP这些系统最好了,可以直接用它们的分区格式化功能.
The following is the speech of cn_archer on 2004-11-25 0:53:20:
Generally speaking, when I buy a new hard drive, I will get a detection tool of that brand of hard drive to check if there are bad sectors. If there are bad sectors, there is no need to say more.
If there are no bad sectors, it doesn't matter which software is used for partitioning.
But FDISK is really too slow, especially when partitioning a 250G hard drive...
Yes. For example, Seagate uses Seatools, and IBM uses DFT for detection. Then use DM for quick partitioning, and then install Windows into the system for formatting. For systems like 2000, XP, etc., it is best to directly use their partitioning and formatting functions.
|
|
|
2005-1-16 00:00 |
|
|
97040240
初级用户
积分 128
发帖 7
注册 2004-8-27
状态 离线
|
『第 11 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
如果新硬盘当然用FDisk，如果硬盘有数据，我觉得partition Magic最好
If it's FDisk for a new hard disk. If the hard disk has data, I think Partition Magic is the best
|
|
|
2005-1-26 00:00 |
|
|
simson2010
初级用户
积分 104
发帖 2
注册 2005-1-28
状态 离线
|
『第 12 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
160G~{5DS2EL#,SC~}XP~{9bFt#,R27V2;AK#,V;HO3v~}137G~{#,~}~{UbJGJ2C4T-Rr#?~}
160G~{5DS2EL#,SC~}XP~{9bFt#,R27V2;AK#,V;HO3v~}137G~{#,~}~{UbJGJ2C4T-Rr#?~}
|
|
|
2005-1-28 00:00 |
|
|
liuxishu
初级用户
积分 102
发帖 1
注册 2005-1-29
状态 离线
|
|
|
2005-1-29 00:00 |
|
|
DOSforever
金牌会员
积分 4639
发帖 2239
注册 2005-1-30
状态 离线
|
『第 14 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
以下是引用defrag在2004-12-19 18:57:34的发言：
>
FDISK /ACTOK
有资料说这个参数是让FDISK跳过磁盘检测，可以加快分区的速度，类似于DM的快速格式化。但本人试了多次均无效，百分数还是慢吞吞地跳，与不使用这个参数时分区速度一样。
过去我也一直是FDISK坚定的使用者，总觉得用它分出来的区“纯”一点，看着那些第三方的分区软件这么快就把一个硬盘给分好了，总觉得有一点“草草了事”不放心的感觉。但随着硬盘容量不断的加大，再用FDISK就没有这个耐心了。而且如果你要安装多操作系统的话，用FDISK是无法满足某些特定的要求的。
The following is a quote from defrag's post on December 19, 2004 at 18:57:34:
>
FDISK /ACTOK
Some materials say that this parameter allows FDISK to skip disk checking, which can speed up the partitioning speed, similar to the quick format of DM. But I have tried many times and it is still ineffective. The percentage still jumps slowly, the same as when not using this parameter.
In the past, I was also a firm user of FDISK. I always felt that the partitions divided by it were "pure" a bit. Seeing that some third-party partitioning software can divide a hard drive so quickly, I always feel a little "hastily done" and uneasy. But as the hard drive capacity continues to increase, I no longer have the patience to use FDISK. Moreover, if you want to install multiple operating systems, FDISK cannot meet certain specific requirements.
|
DOS倒下了，但永远不死
DOS NEVER DIES !
投票调查：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=46187
本人尚未解决的疑难问题：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=15135
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=47663
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=48747 |
|
|
2005-1-30 00:00 |
|
|
zjnbwdj
中级用户
积分 300
发帖 137
注册 2005-11-4
状态 离线
|
『第 15 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
SFDISK...怎么没人说它?我一直用它来分区,快速,直观,空间利用率高,不像FDISK,分完区后还有剩余的空间,SFDISK可以允许有多个主分区,而FDISK则只允许一个主分区.
SFDISK... Why doesn't anyone talk about it? I've been using it to partition, it's fast, intuitive, and has high space utilization. Unlike FDISK, which leaves remaining space after partitioning. SFDISK allows multiple primary partitions, while FDISK only allows one primary partition.
|
|
|
2006-4-15 22:40 |
|
