中国DOS联盟

Looking forward to seeing the Windows version of dpit with drive letter display as soon as possible. Human desires are endless. Hehe.

Originally posted by lianjiang2004 at 2007-1-24 20:44:
Looking forward to seeing the Windows version of dpit with drive letter display soon. Human desires are endless. Hehe.

Displaying drive letters and partition correspondences under Windows is relatively easier compared to DOS. Please be patient for a few days. When the DOS version is basically problem-free, I will release the Windows version.

Originally posted by 19951001 at 2007-1-24 20:59:

Displaying the correspondence between drive letters and partitions under Windows is relatively easier compared to DOS. Please be patient for a few days. When the DOS version is basically free of issues, I will release the Windows version.

Thanks. Currently, using ghost32 to obtain the correspondence between drive letters and partitions is cumbersome with a large software size and slow operation. Looking forward to your work.

I want to run dpit to display only the first column's 1:x and nothing else. How to do it?

What is this tool used for~~~ I'm very stupid~ Please give me some pointers~~`

Please ask the author to pay attention to this issue of the DPIT displaying partition numbers. Under the same DOS conditions, the dpit (version 06-12-26) on the boot disk and ghost were run to obtain the hard disk partition numbers. It was found that there was a problem. The partition numbers could not be obtained correctly, causing the ghost automatic backup to not proceed normally. Please confirm with the author whether it is a bug? How to solve it?

－－－－－－－－－
DPIT result:
No. Type PartitionType Active StartSector Sectors MBytes
0:1 Logic HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
0:2 Logic HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
0:3 Logic HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
0:4 Primary HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186
－－－－－－－－－－
ghost-dd result
Key 1:1
Path 1:1
Desc 1:1
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 63

Key 1:2
Path 1:2
Desc 1:2
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 31101903

Key 1:3
Path 1:3
Desc 1:3
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 81931563

Key 1:4
Path 1:4
Desc 1:4
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 245778498

Originally posted by lianjiang2004 at 2007-1-26 22:57:
Please ask the author to pay attention to this DPIT display partition number issue.
Under the same DOS conditions, running dpit (version 06-12-26) on the boot disk and ghost to obtain the hard disk partition number. The problem was found.
Unable to correctly obtain ...

Do not use the problems that occurred in the old version, report the error here, please use the new version.

The new version is on the first floor and 107th floor.

Originally posted by 19951001 at 2007-1-27 00:38:

Don't report issues with old versions here. Please use the new version.

The new versions are on the first floor and post 107.

The version isn't really that old. Because in your newly released versions, they are all beta versions with time limits. The previous versions were relatively stable and had no restrictions. Putting the time-limited ones on a one-key recovery disk would prevent others from using them later.
Also, in the changes.log of your various versions, there's no mention of algorithm changes, like 1. Cancel parameter /NOEXT 2. Add parameter /EXT. These changes don't mean much to me. For me, as long as I can get the partition number (and if possible, the corresponding relationship between partitions and drive letters under Windows), it's sufficient, so I didn't update the version in time.
I'll update the version immediately. Thank you for your software!

If the dpit result is as follows:
No. Type PartitionType Active StartSector Sectors MBytes
1:1 Logic HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
1:2 Logic HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
1:3 Logic HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
1:4 Primary HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186

How to get the following display into 1.txt under DOS:
1:1
1:2
1:3
1:4

If there are multiple hard disks, can it be displayed into 1.txt:
1:1
1:2
1:3
1:4
2:1
2:2
2:3
2:4

Last edited by terse on 2007-1-27 at 02:26 AM ]

Tested respectively with dspt0122, dspt0120, dpit0115, dpit1226 versions and Ghost. The results are as follows:
The results of the four versions are the same, the primary partition number is incorrect; in addition, there is a partition label error (it should be 160_3).
------------------------------
DSPT0122.TXT
No. Drv Type Volume PartType Act Offset Sectors MBytes
0:1 Logic 160_1 HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
0:2 Logic 160_2 HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
0:3 Logic ` HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
0:4 Primary VISTA HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186
------------------------------
DSPT0120.TXT
No. Drv Type Volume PartType Act Offset Sectors MBytes
0:1 Logic 160_1 HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
0:2 Logic 160_2 HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
0:3 Logic ` HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
0:4 Primary VISTA HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186
------------------------------
DPIT0115.TXT
No. Drv Type Volume PartType Act Offset Sectors MBytes
0:1 Logic 160_1 HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
0:2 Logic 160_2 HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
0:3 Logic ` HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
0:4 Primary VISTA HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186
------------------------------
DPIT1226.TXT
No. Type PartitionType Active StartSector Sectors MBytes
0:1 Logic HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
0:2 Logic HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
0:3 Logic HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
0:4 Primary HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186
------------------------------
GHSTSTAT.TXT
Key 1:1
Path 1:1
Desc 1:1
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 63

Key 1:2
Path 1:2
Desc 1:2
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 31101903

Key 1:3
Path 1:3
Desc 1:3
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 81931563

Key 1:4
Path 1:4
Desc 1:4
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 245778498

Key 1:1
Path 1:1
Desc 1:1
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 63

Key 1:2
Path 1:2
Desc 1:2
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 31101903

Key 1:3
Path 1:3
Desc 1:3
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 81931563

Key 1:4
Path 1:4
Desc 1:4
Type NTFS
Disk 0
Offset 245778498

to lianjiang2004:
I estimate that it is because you used the hidden function of the extended partition that the situation you had occurred. This function has been disabled in this version.

Second version on 2006.1.26, please test if there are still any issues.

Last edited by 19951001 on 2007-1-27 at 06:47 AM ]

Test results of version 0126 re-downloaded from the first floor. The results are unchanged.
1, Parameter: dipt 0 /l

Disk Partitions Cylinders Heads Sectors TotalSectors Mbytes
0 5 19929 255 63 320173056 156334

No. Drv Type Volume PartType Act Offset Sectors MBytes
1 Extended LBA 31101840 289057545 141141
2 Logic HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
3 Logic HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
4 Logic HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
5 Primary HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186
-----------------
2, Parameter: dipt 0 /find:all

No. Drv Type Volume PartType Act Offset Sectors MBytes
0:1 Extended LBA 31101840 289057545 141141
0:2 Logic HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
0:3 Logic HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
0:4 Logic HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
0:5 Primary HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186

Last edited by lianjiang2004 on 2007-1-27 at 08:17 AM ]

The test result of version 0126 on floor 107 is also incorrect.
The result shows that if the algorithm for obtaining the partition number is not changed, using the same algorithm, no matter which version is used, the result must be the same. It would be strange if they were different. Hehe.

The following are the results.
Disk Partitions Cylinders Heads Sectors TotalSectors Mbytes
0 4 19929 255 63 320173056 156334

No. Drv Type Volume PartType Act Offset Sectors MBytes
1 Logic 160_1 HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
2 Logic 160_2 HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
3 Logic ` HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
4 Primary VISTA HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
No. Drv Type Volume PartType Act Offset Sectors MBytes
0:1 Logic 160_1 HPFS/NTFS 31101903 50829597 24819
0:2 Logic 160_2 HPFS/NTFS 81931563 163846872 80003
0:3 Logic ` HPFS/NTFS 245778498 74380887 36318
0:4 Primary VISTA HPFS/NTFS Yes 63 31101777 15186

Looking forward to the author solving this problem as soon as possible.

Does the version 0126 have a time limit?

Hope to continue to be improved!

Currently, it is still unable to display the drive letter of the NTFS partition that has correctly assigned the drive letter after the IFS driver is loaded, and it is also unable to display the volume label of the NTFS partition!

If it can be like this, it will be perfect. Using it together with IFS is simply a perfect match!