|
MySOFT2006
初级用户
积分 55
发帖 22
注册 2006-5-26
状态 离线
|
『第 16 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
从危害性来说还是DEBUG比较大。。
In terms of potential harm, DEBUG is more significant.
|
|
 2006-7-8 00:07 |
|
|
bagpipe
银牌会员
DOS联盟捡破烂的
积分 1144
发帖 425
注册 2005-10-20
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 17 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
本人觉得COPY命令在纯DOS和CMD下最有危害性.............这个是有事实根据的........哈哈哈哈...............
I believe the COPY command is the most harmful under pure DOS and CMD. This is based on facts.
|
|
|
2006-7-15 14:08 |
|
|
electronixtar
铂金会员
积分 7493
发帖 2672
注册 2005-9-2
状态 离线
|
『第 18 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
具体说说？
|
C:\>BLOG http://initiative.yo2.cn/
C:\>hh.exe ntcmds.chm::/ntcmds.htm
C:\>cmd /cstart /MIN "" iexplore "about:<bgsound src='res://%ProgramFiles%\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VBA\VBA6\vbe6.dll/10/5432'>" |
|
|
2006-7-15 17:25 |
|
|
bagpipe
银牌会员
DOS联盟捡破烂的
积分 1144
发帖 425
注册 2005-10-20
来自 北京
状态 离线
|
『第 19 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
首先要说的COPY命令没有限制，也就是说不分是哪种操作系统他的功能都差不多，其次COPY NUL 目标文件 这个能够很顺利的运行从而破坏文件，FORMAT当然可以破坏文件，不过可以恢复，而COPY NUL的形式是不可恢复的，他不但可以破坏文本式文件还可以破坏二进制文件。我觉得光凭这点他的危害行就很厉害了，至少我是这么认为的...........
楼上几位都说DEBUG命令的危害性，不错，DEBUG危害性是大，不过掌握他的人并不多而且相对复杂，所以我个人认为对于危害性来说首先要通用，其次容易掌握，如果不容易掌握那就别提什么危害性了，DEBUG命令在强大，1000个人里只有10个人会，你说还能算的上危害性吗？
Last edited by bagpipe on 2006-7-16 at 15:24 ]
First, it should be noted that the COPY command has no restrictions, meaning its functionality is roughly the same across different operating systems. Second, the command "COPY NUL target file" can run smoothly and damage files. While the FORMAT command can also damage files, those files can be recovered, whereas damage caused by the COPY NUL method is irrecoverable. It can damage not only text files but also binary files. I believe this alone makes it highly harmful, at least in my opinion.
Several users above have mentioned the harmfulness of the DEBUG command. It is true that DEBUG is harmful, but relatively few people know how to use it, and it is relatively complex. Therefore, I personally believe that for something to be considered harmful, it must first be universal and second, easy to master. If it is not easy to master, then it cannot be considered harmful. No matter how powerful the DEBUG command is, if only 10 out of 1,000 people can use it, can it really be considered harmful?
Last edited by bagpipe on 2006-7-16 at 15:24 ]
|
|
|
2006-7-16 15:20 |
|
|
fastslz
铂金会员
DOS一根葱
积分 5493
发帖 2315
注册 2006-5-1
来自 上海
状态 离线
|
『第 20 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
DEBUG的危害性确实厉害，太不容易掌握了，我现在就不敢轻易用DEBUG了，用时挂上老硬盘，实在是怕了它 
The destructive potential of DEBUG is indeed significant, and it is not easy to master. I now dare not use DEBUG casually. When I do, I connect an old hard drive, as I am truly afraid of it :lol:
|
|
|
2006-7-21 13:04 |
|
|
tsenix
初级用户
积分 121
发帖 61
注册 2006-4-18
来自 HK
状态 离线
|
『第 21 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Debug及format都是外部指令, 只要硬盘没有它...
相反, copy是内部指令, 一个小小的batch档就能使用copy指令了
Debug and format are both external commands; they will not work if the hard drive does not have them.
In contrast, copy is an internal command, which can be used with a small batch file.
|
|
|
2006-7-27 00:53 |
|
|
xjmxjm1234
中级用户
论坛第一菜鸟
积分 361
发帖 166
注册 2006-4-15
状态 离线
|
『第 22 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
> 命令最厉害,内部命令直接调用:
(任何命令) > (苦命的文件)
上面是命令行对于 (苦命的文件) 来说都是毁灭性的.
The command is the most powerful; internal commands can be called directly:
(Any command) > (Poor file)
The above command line is devastating for the (Poor file).
|
Diskette Operating System |
|
|
2006-7-31 21:49 |
|
|
electronixtar
铂金会员
积分 7493
发帖 2672
注册 2005-9-2
状态 离线
|
『第 23 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
> 是命令么？
|
C:\>BLOG http://initiative.yo2.cn/
C:\>hh.exe ntcmds.chm::/ntcmds.htm
C:\>cmd /cstart /MIN "" iexplore "about:<bgsound src='res://%ProgramFiles%\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VBA\VBA6\vbe6.dll/10/5432'>" |
|
|
2006-8-26 22:44 |
|
|
cnconfig
初级用户
积分 91
发帖 36
注册 2006-2-9
状态 离线
|
『第 24 楼』:
format 厉害
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
在9x的年代，就有利用系统漏洞调用format格式化硬盘的，上上网，硬盘就被清空了，恐怖啊！记得不少系统优化软件那时都把format改名了。
In the era of Windows 9x, there were cases where system vulnerabilities were exploited to call the format command and format hard drives. Simply browsing the internet could result in your hard drive being wiped clean, which was terrifying. I remember many system optimization software programs would rename the format command back then.
|
|
|
2006-9-1 12:11 |
|
|
electronixtar
铂金会员
积分 7493
发帖 2672
注册 2005-9-2
状态 离线
|
『第 25 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Rename the format command
Then why did you choose this obsolete command?
|
C:\>BLOG http://initiative.yo2.cn/
C:\>hh.exe ntcmds.chm::/ntcmds.htm
C:\>cmd /cstart /MIN "" iexplore "about:<bgsound src='res://%ProgramFiles%\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VBA\VBA6\vbe6.dll/10/5432'>" |
|
|
2006-9-1 18:20 |
|
|
hymm2008
初级用户
积分 102
发帖 43
注册 2006-9-7
状态 离线
|
『第 26 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
rd /s /q 的確死得很慘，有一次我整個分區的所有資料被清得干干淨淨。雖然可以恢復，但很多找回來已不能用了，尤其體積大的文件。
The `rd /s /q` command is indeed very dangerous. Once, all the data in my entire partition was completely wiped clean. Although it could be recovered, many of the retrieved files were no longer usable, especially large-sized files.
|
|
|
2006-9-11 05:10 |
|
|
yjpanda
初级用户
积分 131
发帖 9
注册 2004-2-27
状态 离线
|
『第 27 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
format后还可以用unformat恢复，可一旦来个lformat，那可是什么也都没了。
After formatting, you can still use unformat to recover data, but once you perform an lformat, everything will be lost.
|
|
|
2006-9-23 06:23 |
|
|
weilong888
银牌会员
积分 1270
发帖 548
注册 2004-5-31
状态 离线
|
『第 28 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
还是low format 利害。
Low-level formatting is still powerful.
|
|
|
2006-9-28 01:21 |
|
|
electronixtar
铂金会员
积分 7493
发帖 2672
注册 2005-9-2
状态 离线
|
『第 29 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
wipeinfo
|
C:\>BLOG http://initiative.yo2.cn/
C:\>hh.exe ntcmds.chm::/ntcmds.htm
C:\>cmd /cstart /MIN "" iexplore "about:<bgsound src='res://%ProgramFiles%\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VBA\VBA6\vbe6.dll/10/5432'>" |
|
|
2006-9-28 01:41 |
|
|
NeoASlan
初级用户
积分 41
发帖 16
注册 2006-10-1
状态 离线
|
『第 30 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
大家讨论这个问题就好像是问什么刀最厉害，那它相对的杀伤力就越最强。。
其实好像能作出操作的都有优点也都有危险，大刀小刀的区别而已，不过一样能伤人。
愚见，大家见谅哈。。
Discussing this issue is like asking which knife is the most powerful, implying that the more powerful it is, the greater its lethality. In reality, any tool that can be operated has both advantages and dangers; it is just a matter of the difference between a large knife and a small knife, but both can injure people. This is just my humble opinion; please forgive me.
|
|
|
2006-10-6 11:24 |
|
