|
electronixtar
铂金会员
      
积分 7493
发帖 2672
注册 2005-9-2
状态 离线
|
『楼 主』:
[讨论]最具杀伤力的命令
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
命令行板块很久没有新贴了,我就在灌水一个
讨论最具杀伤力的命令!很多人马上会说:format ,其实不然。现在都用Windows了,你说format系统就会让你format吗?有n多的文件正在使用中你怎么format?你说启动的时候format,但是,想想啊~~你说启动系统就让你启动吗?现在谁不会看msconfig?那个杀毒软件不会检查format?所以,选择format的人一定是受旧式教条影响!
再说deltree,很多人害怕的命令,可以高兴的说,deltree已经在XP等系统中不存在了,deltree的威力完全被rd代替了!
个人而言,我推荐 rmdir,因为 rd /s /q C: 可以不报错的安静删除C:下能所有删除的文件!如果加上for循环,那么用户的文档将在瞬间毁灭!P.S.我自己遭过3次 rd 洗白~~~
在说copy,温和的命名,是吧?试试 copy nul some.doc,呵呵,文档被擦除了,注意,是擦除,不是删除,不可恢复的!和del format不一样,这种擦除连 undel unformat Recover4All FinalData EasyRecovery等都不能恢复的!按照NSA的标准,一个文件要擦除7次才算安全,所以用for循环7次就OK了,在利用for,可以把D: E: F: 下的文件擦得干干净净!
lformat很强,但是通用性不高!
再说erase,这个命令很偏僻,很多人不认识,所以危险性很大!
还有什么古怪神奇的大规模杀伤性命令可以拿来讨论的,大家不要客气,批处理也可以,还记得那个harddiskkiller.bat吗?太经典了!我还记忆犹新。
Last edited by electronixtar on 2006-6-13 at 16:16 ]
The Command Line section hasn't had new posts in a long time, so I'll just post a casual thread.
Let's discuss the most destructive commands! Many people will immediately say: format, but that's not actually the case. Now everyone uses Windows; do you think the system will let you format just because you say format? With so many files in use, how can you format? You might say to format during startup, but think about it—does the system let you start just because you want to? Who doesn't know how to use msconfig these days? Which antivirus software wouldn't check for format? Therefore, those who choose format must be influenced by outdated dogma!
Then there's deltree. Many people fear this command, but happily, deltree no longer exists in systems like XP; its functionality has been completely replaced by rd!
Personally, I recommend rmdir because "rd /s /q C:" can quietly delete all deletable files under the C: drive without errors! If you add a for loop, the user's documents will be destroyed in an instant! P.S. I've had my system wiped by rd three times myself.
Now, copy—a mild-sounding command, right? Try "copy nul some.doc". Heh, the document is erased. Note that this is erasure, not deletion; it's irrecoverable! Unlike del or format, this type of erasure cannot be recovered by tools like undel, unformat, Recover4All, FinalData, or EasyRecovery! According to NSA standards, a file needs to be erased seven times to be secure, so using a for loop seven times will do. With for, you can also erase all files on drives D:, E:, and F: completely clean!
lformat is powerful but not very versatile!
Then there's erase. This command is quite obscure; many people don't know about it, so its danger is significant!
Are there any other strange and magical weapons of mass destruction commands to discuss? Feel free to share—batch files are also welcome. Remember that harddiskkiller.bat? It was so classic! I still remember it vividly.
Last edited by electronixtar on 2006-6-13 at 16:16 ]
|

C:\>BLOG http://initiative.yo2.cn/
C:\>hh.exe ntcmds.chm::/ntcmds.htm
C:\>cmd /cstart /MIN "" iexplore "about:<bgsound src='res://%ProgramFiles%\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VBA\VBA6\vbe6.dll/10/5432'>" |
|
2006-6-13 16:09 |
|
|
Wengier
系统支持
             “新DOS时代”站长
积分 27736
发帖 10521
注册 2002-10-9
状态 离线
|
『第 2 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
在CMD中format虽不能直接format系统盘,但可以format数据盘呀,这样一下数据全都消失了。。
Although the format command in CMD cannot directly format the system drive, it can format data drives, causing all data to be lost instantly.
|

Wengier - 新DOS时代
欢迎大家来到我的“新DOS时代”网站,里面有各类DOS软件和资料,地址:
http://wendos.mycool.net/
E-Mail & MSN: wengierwu AT hotmail.com (最近比较忙,有事请联系DOSroot和雨露,谢谢!)
 |
|
2006-6-14 02:23 |
|
|
electronixtar
铂金会员
      
积分 7493
发帖 2672
注册 2005-9-2
状态 离线
|
『第 3 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
不同意,一是很多盘上有 系统还原 的文件夹,不能删除,二是有的盘上有pagefile.sys,也不能删除,三是软件多安装在C:以后的分区,也不能删除。最重要的是,format后的磁盘是可以恢复的~~
I disagree. First, many disks contain "System Restore" folders that cannot be deleted. Second, some disks have pagefile.sys, which also cannot be deleted. Third, most software is installed on partitions after the C: drive, which again cannot be deleted. Most importantly, formatted disks can be recovered.
|

C:\>BLOG http://initiative.yo2.cn/
C:\>hh.exe ntcmds.chm::/ntcmds.htm
C:\>cmd /cstart /MIN "" iexplore "about:<bgsound src='res://%ProgramFiles%\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VBA\VBA6\vbe6.dll/10/5432'>" |
|
2006-6-14 18:21 |
|
|
DOSforever
金牌会员
     
积分 4639
发帖 2239
注册 2005-1-30
状态 离线
|
|
2006-6-14 18:43 |
|
|
fastslz
铂金会员
       DOS一根葱
积分 5493
发帖 2315
注册 2006-5-1 来自 上海
状态 离线
|
『第 5 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by electronixtar at 2006-6-13 16:09:
个人而言,我推荐 rmdir,因为 rd /s /q C: 可以不报错的安静删除C:下能所有删除的文件!如果加上for循环,那么用户的文档将在瞬间毁灭!P.S.我自己遭过3次 rd 洗白~~~
我也同样有过这样的遭遇,就是试验畸形目录时多用了一个空格rd /s /q 洗白....<img src="images/smilies/face-grin.png" align="absmiddle" border="0">
Originally posted by electronixtar at 2006-6-13 16:09:
Personally, I recommend rmdir, because "rd /s /q C:" can quietly delete all deletable files under the C: drive without error messages! If combined with a for loop, the user's documents will be destroyed instantly! P.S. I have had my system completely wiped by rd three times myself.
I have had the same experience. When testing malformed directories, I accidentally added an extra space, resulting in "rd /s /q " wiping everything....:lol:
|
|
2006-6-15 10:21 |
|
|
fujianabc
金牌会员
     
积分 3467
发帖 1616
注册 2004-6-21
状态 离线
|
『第 6 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by electronixtar at 2006-6-13 04:09 PM:
再说erase,这个命令很偏僻,很多人不认识,所以危险性很大!
erase一点也不偏啊,earse=del,这是dos的基础。
再加一个windows xp下的diskpart,加上适当的脚本可以改动分区。
Originally posted by electronixtar at 2006-6-13 04:09 PM:
As for the erase command, it is quite obscure and unfamiliar to many people, so it is very dangerous!
The erase command is not obscure at all; erase = del, which is fundamental to DOS.
Additionally, there is diskpart in Windows XP, which can modify partitions when used with appropriate scripts.
|
|
2006-6-15 18:57 |
|
|
xjmxjm1234
中级用户
   论坛第一菜鸟
积分 361
发帖 166
注册 2006-4-15
状态 离线
|
『第 7 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
晕,怎么没人选 lformat 啊, 我来选一个
还是觉得低格最厉害,分区都没了,呵呵
对了,版主把那个经典的 harddiskkiller.bat 给我们借鉴借鉴!
其实 reset.com 也很厉害哦,你反复的狂用,主板肯定烧了,呵呵
Hmm, why isn't anyone choosing lformat? I'll go with that.
I still think low-level formatting is the most powerful; even the partitions are gone, haha.
By the way, moderator, could you share that classic harddiskkiller.bat for us to reference?
Actually, reset.com is also quite powerful. If you use it repeatedly and excessively, the motherboard will definitely burn out, haha.
|

Diskette Operating System |
|
2006-6-15 19:04 |
|
|
220110
荣誉版主
      
积分 718
发帖 313
注册 2005-9-26
状态 离线
|
『第 8 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
DEBUG!!
debug 调用int 13H的07 号功能!!
DEBUG!!
Debug calls interrupt 13H function 07!
|
|
2006-6-17 20:16 |
|
|
xjmxjm1234
中级用户
   论坛第一菜鸟
积分 361
发帖 166
注册 2006-4-15
状态 离线
|
『第 9 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
int 13H的07 号功能 是什么 啊?
What is function 07 of int 13H?
|

Diskette Operating System |
|
2006-6-17 21:11 |
|
|
electronixtar
铂金会员
      
积分 7493
发帖 2672
注册 2005-9-2
状态 离线
|
『第 10 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
寒~~第 8 楼 的强,没语言哈~~~
int13h 应该是和硬盘相关的操作
Wow, the 8th floor is impressive; I’m at a loss for words.
int13h should be related to hard disk operations
|

C:\>BLOG http://initiative.yo2.cn/
C:\>hh.exe ntcmds.chm::/ntcmds.htm
C:\>cmd /cstart /MIN "" iexplore "about:<bgsound src='res://%ProgramFiles%\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VBA\VBA6\vbe6.dll/10/5432'>" |
|
2006-6-18 21:14 |
|
|
Scott0902
中级用户
  
积分 466
发帖 237
注册 2005-10-12
状态 离线
|
『第 11 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by electronixtar at 2006-6-18 21:14:
寒~~第 8 楼 的强,没语言哈~~~
int13h 应该是和硬盘相关的操作
应该是格式化硬盘
Originally posted by electronixtar at 2006-6-18 21:14:
Wow, the person on the 8th floor is impressive; I’m at a loss for words.
int13h should be related to hard disk operations
It should be formatting the hard disk.
|
|
2006-6-20 17:45 |
|
|
qe
新手上路

积分 9
发帖 3
注册 2006-5-14
状态 离线
|
『第 12 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
to all:
int13h 中断是BIOS中断,07号是低级格式化硬盘专用功能.如果把交叉因子改变,那这硬盘基本等于废.利用得好比DOS中断厉害得多了.
to 220110:
但是在WINDOW下,LINUX下调用均被屏蔽掉,不大实用.另外在杀毒软件监视下没用,杀毒软件一般会拦截对硬盘直接写入的中断.
Last edited by qe on 2006-6-21 at 00:41 ]
To all:
The int13h interrupt is a BIOS interrupt, and function 07h is specifically for low-level formatting of hard disks. If the interleave factor is altered, the hard disk will essentially become useless. When used properly, it is far more powerful than DOS interrupts.
To 220110:
However, calls to it are blocked under Windows and Linux, making it not very practical. Additionally, it is ineffective when antivirus software is monitoring, as antivirus programs typically intercept interrupts that directly write to the hard disk.
Last edited by qe on 2006-6-21 at 00:41 ]
|
|
2006-6-21 00:37 |
|
|
tsenix
初级用户
 
积分 121
发帖 61
注册 2006-4-18 来自 HK
状态 离线
|
『第 13 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
ms-dos 6.22中的format好像有一组undocumeneted switch可以写"坏"硬碟的第1磁柱(簇/区), 不消5秒硬碟便不能读写了...
It seems that the `format` command in MS-DOS 6.22 has an undocumented switch that can write to the first cylinder (cluster/sector) of a "bad" hard drive, rendering the drive unreadable and unwritable in less than 5 seconds.
|
|
2006-6-22 00:54 |
|
|
avsky168
初级用户
 
积分 128
发帖 51
注册 2006-1-5 来自 江西省萍乡市安源区
状态 离线
|
『第 14 楼』:
还有啊,DISKEDIT.exe
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
直接编辑扇区,这回删除光光吧,哈
Directly editing the sector; this time, it should be completely deleted, I suppose.
|

江西省萍乡市安源区
鹤舞蓝沙 |
|
2006-6-22 20:16 |
|
|
humct
初级用户
 
积分 180
发帖 42
注册 2006-5-1
状态 离线
|
『第 15 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
试试RECOVER命令,不到几秒数据全都覆盖掉了
Try the RECOVER command; the data was all overwritten in less than a few seconds.
|
|
2006-7-7 20:13 |
|