中国DOS联盟

Windows 3.x is a good GUI interface software under DOS. Unfortunately, many new graphics cards do not have Win3.x driver programs, resulting in only 16 colors being displayed under Win3.x all the time. Originally, Win3.11 had a so-called universal SVGA driver, but this driver still cannot work properly on many graphics cards. However, now it's better. Currently, there is an updated version of the original SVGA driver, so it has become a truly universal 256-color SVGA driver. In this way, even on new graphics cards, Win3.x can display 256 colors, including on the new computer I just bought. This should be said to be a very good news. The installation method is also very simple. First, extract it to a certain folder, and then install it as the path of the Win3.x graphics card driver. Recommended.

Nice stuff, I want to try it.

Nice stuff, will try later.

It's really successful, everyone can give it a try

Good stuff, can't not top it

Hehe, but my graphics card has a win 3.1 driver, which can be adjusted to 1280×1024×24Bit@85HZ. Bump up.

Originally posted by Michael at 2006-1-11 19:38:
Hehe, but my graphics card has a Win 3.1 driver, which can be adjusted to 1280×1024×24Bit@85HZ. Give it a thumbs up.

My old Trident 9750 PCI graphics card also came with complete Win 3.x drivers, with a maximum resolution of 1600×1200! I also tried using it to achieve 32-bit true color in Win 3.2, and I could play Photoshop 4.0 under Win 3.2 and use Kingsoft Video霸 to watch VCDs! But this graphics card is too outdated today, and it's not worth much if sold, so I just keep it in the cabinet as a treasure.

Well, your Trident 9750 is really powerful. My graphics card can only support 8-bit color depth at 1600×1200. Some software has overlapping fonts and distorted graphics at high color depths. Currently, I'm using Windows 3.1 with 256 colors at 1600×1200@75HZ, and it's quite good for editing documents with Word 6.0 in daily use.

Such a good graphics card, it's better to put it in a slightly older computer to continue its use, like my Trident 9680 graphics card. It's a pity to just let it be unused.

Is that so? Maybe I didn't make myself clear enough, which made Micheal and Wengier misunderstand my meaning.

Actually, my graphics card only has 2MB of video memory. So the maximum resolution for displaying true color is only 800*600. At a resolution of 1024*768, it's at most 16-bit enhanced color. At resolutions of 1280*1024 and 1600*1200, it's only 256 colors. My monitor's maximum resolution is 1280*1024, and I haven't seen what it's like at the ultra-high resolution of 1600*1200.

This graphics card has no 3D acceleration, so its 3D performance is extremely poor! Moreover, when used in Win2k/XP systems, the desktop occasionally has inexplicable lines, and even causes a system crash! But there are two advantages: it supports the VESA 3.0 standard and comes with a TV-Out interface. Maybe it can still be put to use in situations like playing typing games or doing development in DOS, Win 3.x, but now I have no intention of reusing it. It's really a bit of a pity, ha.

Last edited by JonePeng on 2006-1-13 at 13:15 ]

The piece of Trident 9000 with 1M video memory I had before was installed on a broken 486. Under WIN3.1 and NT3.51, it could only reach 800*600*32768 colors. But at that time, watching VCD with XingMPEG under Win3.1 was also acceptable. I have been unable to find a good video player under NT351.

Just saw it now, great stuff, give it a thumbs up!