总的来说, 应该向GNU/UNIX靠拢.
(偷懒,就用鸟文打了)
1.kernel
1)32 bit
2)support new hardwares
3)module assembled
4)support many vitrual consoles, include a graphic env (text console support to 800*600)
5)kernel support chinese 12-font
2.shell
1)minimal bash-like line supported
2)the shell must be programmale like bash
3.filesystem
MUST NOT be fat16/32! 'Cause they're very bad(you can try)
i think the best fs for dos is ReiserFS or NTFS, they're full logged
4.complitable
you can run dos/16 program dos/32 program win/console program
add a MSDOS complitable mode,(640*480*4bit+command.com shell)

I hope we the dos programmers can use this to develop our dos system!!!

是的，完全支持。

ReiserFS 和 NTFS 哪个好? 还是自己开发一个DosFS?:

自己开发FS目前看来不现实，就用NTFS也可以吧。

可是现在还没有这方面的高手，同时还要有条件，不太现实。必竟DOS不具备商业价值，纯是个人爱好。

虽然在国内不太现实，但我们可以帮助国外DOS的开发，向他们提出各种建议和资料等等。

Naming of device
Long long ago, there are two device naming method:unix/dos
'dos' is easier, but it can only name ports, and it may have the same name of files
'unix' is cool, but think of this: C:\dev\hda1.dev
do you think it's joking?

so we can use newdos naming method:
DEV-TYPE(num,...)
hard disk part: hda1-> HD(1,1)
soft disk: fd0-> FD(1)
cdrom or whole hard disk: hdc-> HD(3)
parr-port: lp0-> LPT(1)
PS: LPT=LPT(1)
serial-port: ttyS0-> COM(1)
mouse: ps2aux-> AUX(ps2)
Note: Any other devices are in AUX()

Cool?

好主意,我原来也有类似想法.