|
acaigg
初级用户
积分 115
发帖 92
注册 2010-12-24
状态 离线
|
『楼 主』:
建议高手们二次开发DOS
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
建议论坛里的版主和高手们二次开发DOS系统，使之具有原来的灵活方便，又有WINDOWS的多姿多彩。我不信外国人能做，中国人就不能。
Suggest that the moderators and experts in the forum carry out secondary development of the DOS system, making it have the original flexibility and convenience, as well as the colorful features of Windows. I don't believe that foreigners can do it, while Chinese people can't.
|
|
 2011-1-20 21:18 |
|
|
HAT
版主
积分 9023
发帖 5017
注册 2007-5-31
状态 离线
|
『第 2 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
你希望DOS变成什么样子？
What kind of appearance do you hope DOS to have?
|
 |
|
|
2011-1-21 21:57 |
|
|
Vista2008
版主
积分 707
发帖 287
注册 2010-1-13
来自 尖竹汶府
状态 离线
|
『第 3 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
LZ的意思大概就是让DOS拥有GUI界面，可以用滑鼠作业！
The meaning of LZ is probably to make DOS have a GUI interface and be able to operate with a mouse!
|
弟控才是王道阿 |
|
|
2011-1-22 14:45 |
|
|
acaigg
初级用户
积分 115
发帖 92
注册 2010-12-24
状态 离线
|
『第 4 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
呵呵，要DOS变成什么样子，我还没有一个很具体很清析的概念。正如Vista2008所说的，最好能支持鼠标作业。但是这样好像减少了DOS的味道。如果不支持鼠标，那对于我们搞设计，画3D图的人来说是一下致命打击。我只是不想DOS退出历史。
Heheh, I don't have a very specific and clear concept of what DOS should become. Just as Vista2008 said, it's best to support mouse operation. But this seems to reduce the flavor of DOS. If it doesn't support the mouse, it's a fatal blow for us who do design and draw 3D graphics. I just don't want DOS to exit history.
|
|
|
2011-1-24 21:18 |
|
|
DOSforever
金牌会员
积分 4639
发帖 2239
注册 2005-1-30
状态 离线
|
|
|
2011-1-24 21:59 |
|
|
peterhuang
初级用户
积分 29
发帖 15
注册 2010-11-24
状态 离线
|
『第 6 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
个人觉得毫无必要。
如果需要内核和图形界面分离的系统，直接用UNIX/Linux就可以了，各方面都大大强于DOS，除了游戏娱乐也多强于Windows。
很多老的dos应用，绝大多数都能在windows平台上找到替代品，所以在dos上花精力是不太值得的。
只是怀旧的话，我觉得虚拟机+dos6.22+win3.1即可，原汁原味。
Personally, I think it's completely unnecessary.
If you need a system with separated kernel and graphical interface, you can just use UNIX/Linux, which is much more powerful than DOS in all aspects, and also more powerful than Windows except for gaming and entertainment.
Many old DOS applications can mostly find alternatives on the Windows platform, so it's not worth spending energy on DOS.
Just for nostalgia, I think virtual machine + DOS 6.22 + Windows 3.1 is enough, original flavor.
|
|
|
2011-1-25 13:20 |
|
