中国DOS联盟

How to set the default Internet browser in the registry?


——————————————— Edited by willsort ———————————————
Moved from: DOS Troubleshooting & Problem Discussion (Help Desk)
——————————————— Edited by willsort ———————————————


Last edited by qwe1234567 on 2005-11-12 at 18:30 ]

This doesn't seem to need to be achieved by modifying the registration. Just check "Check if IE is the default browser" in "Internet Properties" -> "Programs".

Also, the post you made is in the wrong place. It is suggested that you transfer it to the "Windows Series, Unix/Linux and Other Operating Systems Column" by yourself.

I want to set Tencent TT as the default Internet browser, but after I go to Tools >> TT Options >> General Settings >> Tencet Traveler >> Confirm in Tencent TT, the default Internet browser is still Internet Explorer. What should I do?

First, uncheck the "Check if IE is the default browser" in IE, and then set the corresponding options in TT. Sometimes the change won't take effect immediately. Close it and then open TT separately, or restart it. This may be related to your TT version. The latest version seems to have no such problem. Then you transfer this post to the "Windows Series, Unix/Linux and Other Operating Systems Column".

The check for "Is IE the default browser" in my IE is canceled. I opened the TT settings separately and the corresponding options in TT are ineffective, so I come to ask for help! As for the version, please see the picture!

You just tell a version and also post a picture?! Is it too wasteful of space!

There are three situations when using the default browser: one is opening a link in a web page, one is opening a .url file, and the other is opening a local .htm/html file. What you said about the default browser cannot be changed, does this apply to all three situations.

You can try selecting "Detect default browser on startup" in TT's settings to see if it works.

The "Detect default browser on startup" in TT's settings is ineffective!

You have to post a picture just to tell a version?! Is it too wasteful of space!

I reduced the original 24-bit image of 295K to 8-bit of 8.23 K. Shouldn't that be not too wasteful of space?

Originally posted by qwe1234567 at 2005-11-8 20:35:

I reduced the original 24-bit image from 295K to 8-bit 8.23 K. Shouldn't that save a lot of space?

Faint~ The original 24-bit image wasn't deleted. Now you're uploading another image, which wastes a bit of space again

Originally posted by JonePeng at 2005-11-8 22:09:

Faint~ The original 24-bit map was not deleted. Now you uploaded another picture, which wasted a little more space.

The original 24-bit map has been deleted. The picture uploaded now replaces the original 24-bit map. Didn't you notice that the size of the picture has changed? I'm still faint. You don't even know that the size of the picture has changed, and you said I wasted a little more space again. It's really inexplicable!

JonePeng didn't look carefully, and there is no trace of editing in the post of qwe1234567. So the uploaded image was originally 8K.

I'm sorry, I noticed that the size of the image has changed, but I didn't know that the moderator has the permission to manage the uploaded images and attachments.

This time it's my turn to be confused.

Everyone, haven't you edited the attachments? The edited attachments simply don't have any traces of being edited! If you don't believe it, try editing the attachments yourself! Those who are not moderators can also edit their own posts and attachments!

The attachment has been edited and shows signs of editing! The posting time is different from the attachment upload time!