呵呵，HAT 客气了，哪谈得上什么求助，我来解释下吧。
我们知道，现在总是有人打着 DOS 的旗号而问不是 DOS 的问题到处发贴，甚至明知不是 DOS 问题也在 DOS 版块发问。对此，你也看到了，我一直在发现一个就转移一个。除此外我还在陆陆续续的整理整个论坛的帖子。到目前为止也就站务区算是整理完了，其它版块零星整理了一点。目前正在集中整理“解答室”，原本“解答室”我记得好像是总共有398页的主题，目前我只理到动态的第80页，现在总共有255页，离完成这一小步的目标看来还很远。理着理着，时间长了我也感到累了，而且还总是有人时不时的发个自以为是 DOS 的问题进来。我现在看来有点体会到那些离职版主的心情了，刚上任的时候踌躇满志、志高远大，做着做着越做越累，火气越来越大。实际上我正在考虑发布一个公告，今后凡是 DOS 区发错贴的一律予以直接删除，不再提醒，不管是主题还是回帖。
当然，我们知道许多初学者确实对什么是 DOS 的概念很模糊，他们发错贴也可以理解，许多问题如不说明情况也可以理解为是在 DOS 环境下要解决。正因为如此，所以我们更不能“善意”的把他们认为其实是在 CMD 环境下，既然你是发在 DOS 版块，那就要以默认的环境是 DOS 来看待，过于“聪明”的看待他们的问题，迎合他们的想法，其实是对这种错误概念泛滥的纵容，是对乱发帖子这一现象的姑息养奸。所以我在转移那个帖子时做了如下提示：
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=45672
对于你所提的那个帖子来说，主题所提的问题明明白白写了是 DOS 下，而你却去回答他在 CMD 下。当然，我知道你这是好心，知道有许多人说的是 DOS ，其实是 CMD 。但是，原因正是我前面所说，对那些人还是不要过分“热心”的好。而且，从这个例子来看，他所提的问题也确实是要在 DOS 下解决，而你的“好心”却是把人家往 CMD 上引，所以我认为，在 DOS 版块既不要发表非 DOS 话题，也不要回答非 DOS 问题。
最后解释下，不止你 HAT 一人回答非 DOS 问题，为什么只拿你 HAT “开刀”呢？呵呵，其实说“开刀”有点言过其实了，不就扣2分嘛，你等于这个贴没回，平了。如果我扣别人的分，可能别人以为我这是在欺负新手。身为版主，担负的责任自然要重一些，所以就扣你的分了。而且你 HAT 比较“富有”，扣2分不算什么，而且你只是没攒到钱，不能说是亏了，呵呵呵呵。
Hehe, HAT is being too polite. It's not really a matter of asking for help. Let me explain.
We know that now there are always people posting under the guise of DOS but asking non-DOS questions everywhere, and even posting in the DOS section knowing it's not a DOS issue. As you've seen, I've been moving one as I find one. Besides that, I'm also gradually organizing the posts of the entire forum. So far, only the administrative area is sorted out, and a little in other sections. Currently, I'm focusing on organizing the "Q&A Room". Originally, I remember there were a total of 398 pages of topics in the "Q&A Room". Currently, I've only sorted to page 80 of the dynamic, and there are now 255 pages. It seems a long way from achieving this small goal. After sorting for a long time, I also feel tired, and there are always people occasionally posting what they think are DOS issues. Now I somewhat understand the mood of those former moderators. When they first took office, they were full of ambition and high aspirations, but as they did more and more, they got more and more tired and angry. Actually, I'm considering posting an announcement that in the future, any posts in the DOS section that are posted incorrectly will be directly deleted without reminding, whether it's the topic or the reply.
Of course, we know that many beginners are really vague about the concept of what DOS is, and it's understandable that they post incorrectly. Many problems can also be understood as being to be solved in the DOS environment if the situation isn't explained. Precisely because of this, we can't "kindly" think that they actually mean the CMD environment. Since you post in the DOS section, it should be treated with the default environment as DOS. Overly "smartly" looking at their problems and catering to their ideas is actually indulging in the spread of this wrong concept and condoning the phenomenon of random posting. So I made the following prompt when moving that post:
http://www.cn-dos.net/forum/viewthread.php?tid=45672
For the post you mentioned, the question in the topic clearly says it's under DOS, but you went to answer it under CMD. Of course, I know you meant well, knowing that many people say DOS but actually mean CMD. But the reason is exactly what I said earlier, it's better not to be too "enthusiastic" about those people. And from this example, the problem he mentioned does indeed need to be solved under DOS, and your "kindness" is actually leading people to CMD. So I think in the DOS section, neither non-DOS topics should be posted nor non-DOS questions should be answered.
Finally, to explain, it's not just you, HAT, who answered non-DOS questions. Why only target you, HAT? Hehe, actually, saying "target" is an exaggeration. It's just deducting 2 points. You're equivalent to not replying to this post, so it's even. If I deduct points from others, maybe others think I'm bullying newbies. As a moderator, the responsibility is naturally heavier, so I deducted points from you. And you, HAT, are relatively "wealthy", deducting 2 points isn't a big deal, and you just didn't save up money, it can't be said that you lost out, hehehehe.
