中国DOS联盟

Re fastslz

What system are you using? It seems to be 2000? Your reg is different from my version, and the output is also different. Try adjusting the value after skip=, try setting it to 1, or change it to another number, or remove skip=.

Last edited by 无奈何 on 2006-10-3 at 12:45 ]

Strange, XP SP2呀
Bill has specialized it for me :D

@echo off

set reg="HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders"

for /f "tokens=2,*" %%i in ('reg query %reg% /v "Favorites"') do set Favorites=%%j

echo %Favorites%

pause

@echo off

set reg="HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders"

for /f "tokens=2,* delims=这里是个tab" %%i in ('reg query %reg% /v "Favorites"') do set Favorites=%%j

echo %Favorites%

pause

Re fastslz:

Regarding your test 3, the following points can be obtained from your test 1:
1. skip is best == 4
2. "delims= " is invalid.

In your display result, there is content with 8 spaces after REG_SZ, which is easily associated with the fact that tab in Windows defaults to occupying 8 characters. Also, in batch processing, if delims is not specified, the default delims is space/Tab, so it is obvious that your "delims= " parameter is ineffective, and instead, it will make the tab character lose the role of splitting tokens.

It is suggested to test the following codes:

code 1:

@echo off

set reg="HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders"

for /f "tokens=2,*" %%i in ('reg query %reg% /v "Favorites"') do set Favorites=%%j

echo %Favorites%

pause

code 2:

@echo off

set reg="HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders"

for /f "tokens=2,* delims=这里是个tab" %%i in ('reg query %reg% /v "Favorites"') do set Favorites=%%j

echo %Favorites%

pause

end:

As for your test 4, it is even less universal. If any character in REG_SZ is included in the output of the reg command, it may get an incorrect result. Because the delims parameter does not obtain the delimiter according to the string, but treats the string after delims= as the delimiter set, that is, any character in it is regarded as a delimiter. (Case-sensitive)

Reference:

skip=n - Refers to the number of lines to ignore at the beginning of the file.
delims=xxx - Refers to the delimiter set. This replaces the default delimiter set of space and tab.
tokens=x,y,m-n - Refers to which symbols of each line are passed to the for itself in each iteration. This will lead to the assignment of additional variable names. The format of m-n is a range. The mth is specified by the nth symbol. If the last character in the symbol string is an asterisk, then additional variables will be assigned after the last symbol is parsed and accept the reserved text of the line.

Thanks to the reminder from brother 3742668, the original intention was to add skip to increase efficiency, but it seems it was unnecessary. Make a correction. I'm using 2k3 now, and it seems it's really necessary to install a virtual machine for more testing.

::无奈何版主的代码

set reg="HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders"

for /f "skip=2 tokens=2* delims= " %%i in ('reg query %reg% /v "Favorites"') do set Favorites=%%j

echo %Favorites%

::3742668版主的代码

set reg="HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders"

for /f "tokens=2,*" %%i in ('reg query %reg% /v "Favorites"') do set Favorites=%%j

echo %Favorites%

pause

Thanks to 3742668 for the solution. After reading your reference, I have a deeper understanding.

The following is the summary:

1: Due to the particularity of my Windows XP pro SP2 (it has been confirmed that reg.exe has not been replaced), unfortunately, the version master's code cannot be executed normally in my XP, while this code can be executed normally in 2003.

:: Version master's code

set reg="HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders"

for /f "skip=2 tokens=2* delims= " %%i in ('reg query %reg% /v "Favorites"') do set Favorites=%%j

echo %Favorites%

2: The version master's code of 3742668 can be executed normally in my XP and this code can also be executed normally in 2003. It can be seen that the version master's code of 3742668 has stronger universality

:: Version master's code of 3742668

set reg="HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders"

for /f "tokens=2,*" %%i in ('reg query %reg% /v "Favorites"') do set Favorites=%%j

echo %Favorites%

pause

3: Regarding the description of my Windows XP version, the Windows XP pro SP2 product ID belongs to the 011 segment (the generally passed XP version product ID on the network generally belongs to the 640 segment). I have found that these two versions of XP are indeed different since I have been using it.
All XP patches have been updated to 2006-10, and the.NET Framework 2.0 has been installed. These are the only differences. reg.exe MD5: 7f1e65bde053985ba645340bc0cf6497

Hehe...It seems the moderator hasn't slept yet either. You've worked hard, take care of your health哦:)

The VBS version has two functions. I accidentally deleted it when I uploaded and modified it last night. I'm uploading it again today. Everyone, please help test it.
After extracting the attachment to the directory, run the "Install.vbs" in it to install.
Because I've been very busy these days and a little under the weather, the code isn't well-organized and is very messy. Don't laugh at the experts.

The VBS version I like ^_^

I also downloaded and tried it. The VBS version is more streamlined.
electronixtar, your VBS skills are also remarkable. Let's show off some time later ^_^

Cold~~ What I wrote in VBS is just a fragment. There's still a long way to go compared to the moderators.

Thanks 3742668
Hard work, good health is the most important. I also feel uncomfortable everywhere recently.
Try it first!

Today I checked 3 scripts and found a few minor issues, but they don't affect usage. I wonder if anyone has tested and found problems? As for the other functions, they are all relatively simple. Has no one tried them?

Very wonderful post~~ Admire infinitely~:)

Enjoy together...