『楼 主』:
妓女为买房需要劈开几次腿？
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
买了份报纸，浏览了一下，好奇一下北京的房价。二环内都卖到8000～10000元/平方米。假如要拥有一套小一点的两房一厅，居然也得要100万。
关于金钱，我没什么概念。好在比较喜欢具象思维，赶紧换算一下，想起来比较容易。
假如我是个农民，一个人，有一亩地已经不错了。一年种两次，一次小麦，一次玉米，一年能挣个800块，再加上养一群鸭子，卖点鸭蛋，估计最多也就能挣1000块。想要在上海那郊区买套像样的房子，我得不吃不喝地耕种1000年。到那时候，共产主义该实现了吧？
假如我是个工人，没有下岗，一个月拿800块钱，不抽烟，不喝酒，不结婚，不吃饭。渴了喝凉*，饿了吃烂菜叶，冷了拣破麻袋穿，总之，一分钱不花，在房价不上涨的前提前，要买那样的房子，得连续工作100年。估计，没什么工厂要这么老的工人。
假如我是个公务员，混得很一般，一个月2500块，也不抽烟，不喝酒，不吃饭，还不贪污，不受贿，不挪用公款，要想买那样的房子（同样，房价不上涨），我得熬上33年。估计刚买了房子，就得退休了，而且极有可能因为营养不良而迅速逝世。
假如我是个撰稿人，而且混得还不错，每两个字一块钱，我也不抽烟，不喝酒，不吃饭，也不泡文学女青年，要想买那样的房子（同样，房价不上涨），我得连续写2000000字，而且还得保证字字有人要。假如连构思、带写、带修改，每小时可以顺利完成2000字，那么，就得连续写1000个小时，在WORD文档上连续写2000页。我明白了，为什么写字的人容易夭折？憋的。
假如我是妓女，姿色一般，平均每次收获200块，我也不抽烟，不喝酒，不吃饭，不得性病，不养小白脸，要想买那样的房子（同样，房价不上涨），我得连续接5000次客人。假如每天接客两人（含法定节假日），那得连续奋战2500天，费时7年左右。
假如我是抢劫犯，手段一般，眼神一般，每次出手抢得1000元，我也不抽烟，不喝酒，不吃饭，不找女人，不被抓住，要想买那样的房子（同样，房价不上涨），得连续作案1000次，假如每星期作案一次，那得连续作案18年。
假如我是商人，我连吃带喝，也抽烟，也喝酒，也吃饭，也得性病，也养小蜜，只要我有本事贷到款，在房子刚出来的时候，噼里啪啦的付上头款，和同伙一起哄抬，不出两年，几套房子就都到手了。
我说这些，并不想发牢骚。我只想说，土地这东西，都属于国家资源，首要的功用，是为这个国家的老百姓提供服务。在合法的政策下，再加上自己的手段，利用国家资源为自己挣钱，这并没有太大的罪过。只是，凡是必须有个度。任何一个国家，两极分化得厉害，都不是个太好的兆头。当一个城市里的大多数人被挤到城市的边缘时，这便是罪过的一种，和英国的圈地运动并不两样。
我们再想一想，两极分化是怎么形成的？看看以上购房的时限，答案就呼之欲出了。一个普通的公民，他辛辛苦苦地工作一辈子，赚得那点可怜的钱，被祖国拿去一部分，被房地产商拿去一部分，最后再被炒房者拿去一部分，这两极要想不分化，也很困难。想想那些在城市里奋斗多年的普通人，几乎大部分人都背上沉重的房贷包袱。这就是大多数人的命运。
我并不是非议国家不可以从土地中获取利益。只是，大众之财，取之于民，用之于民。假如你获取了这些收入，却无法保障大多数人住上满意的房子，那么这"取"，也取得不理直气壮。或许，我这点想法有点愤青，只是，前两天看新闻，都说宪法有进步了，要保护公民的私有财产了。我想，这还是有个因果关系――前提是，你首先得保障大多数百姓拥有一定数量的财产。假如大伙为了一套破房子都累得死去活来，你还有什么好保护的？世界上，没有绝对公正的法律，物质控制能力决定了其走*，我不能说普通百姓就不收益了，然而，在这个法令下受益最大的，是大多数还是少数人？
耕者有其田，居者有其所，这历来都是百姓对于一个国家最起码的要求。不知为何，我突然想起一个例子，记得很不清晰了――似乎是在老俄罗斯，一个穷人没饭吃，偷了一块面包。在当时，这可是大罪。其结局是，他并没有被定罪，原因是，当一个国家无法为其人民提供生存条件，为了生存，他偷窃了，真正有罪的不是他，而是这个国家。
来吧！魔鬼！ 你的存在将为我的生命乐章增添更多的伏笔和惊奇！ 没有你奇迹如何发生！ 来吧！挫败！ 没有你的磨练，我如何成为耀眼夺目的钻石！ 来吧！我的软弱！ 如果我不能看见你，我如何变的刚*！ 来吧！对手！ 没有你的参与，我与谁竞争。
为了那点“幸福”，我要坚持不懈的裸露自己的大腿根处，直到光辉灿烂的彼岸！
Bought to buy a newspaper, glanced through it, and got curious about the housing prices in Beijing. The price within the Second Ring Road has reached 8,000 to 10,000 yuan per square meter. If you want to have a small two-bedroom, one-living room apartment, it would actually cost around 1 million yuan.
I don't have a concept of money. Fortunately, I prefer concrete thinking, so I quickly converted it, which is easier to remember.
If I were a farmer, with one mu of land, that's already pretty good. Planting twice a year, once wheat and once corn, I can earn about 800 yuan a year. Plus raising a flock of ducks and selling duck eggs, I can probably earn at most 1,000 yuan. To buy a decent house in the outskirts of Shanghai, I would have to work without eating or drinking for 1,000 years. By then, communism should have been realized, right?
If I were a worker, not laid off, earning 800 yuan a month. If I don't smoke, don't drink, don't get married, and don't eat. Thirsty, drink cold water; hungry, eat rotten vegetable leaves; cold, pick up tattered sacks to wear. In short, spend no money. If housing prices don't rise, to buy such a house, I would have to work continuously for 100 years. Probably, no factory would want such an old worker.
If I were a civil servant, doing very average, earning 2,500 yuan a month. If I don't smoke, don't drink, don't eat, don't embezzle, don't take bribes, don't misappropriate public funds. To buy such a house (again, with housing prices not rising), I would have to work for 33 years. Probably, I would retire just after buying the house, and most likely die quickly due to malnutrition.
If I were a writer, and doing pretty well, earning 1 yuan per two characters. If I don't smoke, don't drink, don't eat, and don't date literary young women. To buy such a house (again, with housing prices not rising), I would have to write 2,000,000 characters continuously, and also ensure that every character is in demand. If I can smoothly complete 2,000 characters per hour including thinking, writing, and revising, then I would have to write continuously for 1,000 hours, which is 2,000 pages in a WORD document. I understand why writers are easy to die young?憋的.
If I were a prostitute, with average looks, earning 200 yuan per client on average. If I don't smoke, don't drink, don't eat, don't get sexually transmitted diseases, and don't support a小白脸. To buy such a house (again, with housing prices not rising), I would have to receive 5,000 clients continuously. If I receive two clients per day (including legal holidays), it would take 2,500 days continuously, which is about 7 years.
If I were a robber, with average means and average eyesight, earning 1,000 yuan per robbery. If I don't smoke, don't drink, don't eat, don't find women, and aren't caught. To buy such a house (again, with housing prices not rising), I would have to commit 1,000 robberies continuously. If I commit one robbery per week, it would take 18 years continuously.
If I were a businessman, if I eat, drink, smoke, drink, eat, get sexually transmitted diseases, and support a mistress. As long as I can get a loan, at the time the house is launched, pay the down payment quickly, and collude with others to drive up prices, within two years, I can get several houses.
I'm not complaining. I just want to say that land is a national resource, and its primary function is to serve the people of this country. Under legal policies, and with one's own means, using national resources to make money for oneself is not too sinful. However, there must be a limit. If a country has severe polarization, it's not a good sign. When most people in a city are squeezed to the outskirts of the city, that's a kind of sin, no different from the Enclosure Movement in Britain.
Let's think again, how does polarization form? Looking at the time limits for buying a house above, the answer is obvious. An ordinary citizen works hard all his life, earns that pitiful amount of money. Part is taken by the country, part by real estate developers, and part by speculators. It's difficult for polarization not to occur. Think about those ordinary people who have struggled in the city for many years, almost all of them are burdened with heavy mortgage burdens. This is the fate of most people.
I'm not objecting to the country making money from land. However, public money is taken from the people and used for the people. If you get these incomes but can't ensure that most people live in satisfactory houses, then this "taking" is not justifiable. Maybe my thoughts are a bit radical, but the other day I saw news saying that the Constitution has made progress and will protect private property. I think there is a causal relationship here – the premise is that you first ensure that most people have a certain amount of property. If everyone is exhausted trying to get a broken house, what's there to protect? In the world, there is no absolutely just law; material control ability determines its direction. I can't say that ordinary people don't benefit, but under this law, who benefits more, the majority or the minority?
"Farmers have their own fields, and residents have their own dwellings" has always been the most basic requirement of the people for a country. I suddenly remembered an example, which is very vague – it seems that in old Russia, a poor person had no food and stole a piece of bread. At that time, this was a serious crime. The result was that he was not convicted, because when a country cannot provide living conditions for its people, and he steals for survival, the one truly guilty is not him, but the country.
Come on! Devil! Your existence will add more foreshadowing and surprises to my life movement! How can miracles happen without you! Come on! Frustration! Without your tempering, how can I become a dazzling diamond! Come on! My weakness! If I can't see you, how can I become strong! Come on! Opponent! Without your participation, who will I compete with.
For that bit of "happiness", I will persevere in exposing my groin until the glorious other side!
|
