|
jihbb
初级用户
积分 31
发帖 16
注册 2007-9-21
状态 离线
|
|
 2007-9-21 12:01 |
|
|
justsoso
新手上路
积分 5
发帖 3
注册 2007-9-19
状态 离线
|
『第 17 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
谢谢LZ,正在下,应该是个好东东!
Thanks to the LZ, I'm downloading it now. It should be a good thing!
|
|
|
2007-11-8 23:06 |
|
|
dthao
中级用户
LarkSpur
积分 378
发帖 183
注册 2007-9-19
状态 离线
|
『第 18 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
下来看看!
|
海洋遼，佛殿晨鐘敲鳴，喚醒迷津問覺路; 山嶺橫，僧院暮鼓擂振，促修慧業悟空門。 |
|
|
2007-11-14 13:59 |
|
|
mars02zg
新手上路
积分 6
发帖 3
注册 2008-3-26
状态 离线
|
|
|
2008-3-26 12:16 |
|
|
rsice
初级用户
积分 58
发帖 19
注册 2006-9-20
状态 离线
|
『第 20 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
你们去查一下就知道了，这本书的评价毁誉参半，好的说它把汇编搞的像高级语言，可以开发大型程序，借助他们搞出来的hla，不好的说如果写汇编搞的像写c，还不如直接学c。我觉得，都有道理。废话，等于没说。不过我认为关键问题不是它书里的这种方法不好，说白了，他的方案就是一种对汇编的封装，从某种意义上讲，与其封装，还不如直接学高级语言，由其在他的这套方案并未有成为权威标准的情况下。所以我建议大家不要在这本书上浪费时间。
You go and check it, and you'll know. The reviews of this book are mixed. The good things say it makes assembly language look like a high-level language and can develop large programs with the help of the HLA they made. The bad things say if writing assembly language looks like writing C, it's better to just learn C directly. I think both have their reasons. Nonsense, it's like not saying anything. But I think the key issue is not that this method in the book is bad. To put it simply, his plan is just a packaging of assembly language. In a sense, instead of packaging, it's better to just learn a high-level language directly, especially when his set of plans hasn't become an authoritative standard. So I suggest everyone not to waste time on this book.
|
|
|
2008-3-28 23:46 |
|
|
rzwwj1
初级用户
积分 100
发帖 67
注册 2007-6-8
状态 离线
|
|
|
2008-4-26 05:57 |
|
|
lieyan2024
新手上路
积分 3
发帖 2
注册 2008-9-6
状态 离线
|
『第 22 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
顶rsice兄，你真是说出了我的心声。
I agree with brother rsice, you really spoke my mind.
|
|
|
2008-9-8 14:43 |
|
|
cmdrk
新手上路
积分 4
发帖 2
注册 2008-10-5
状态 离线
|
『第 23 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
说得很有道理。以前还听说人家说C/C++是易筋经
That makes a lot of sense. I also heard before that people say C/C++ is the Yijin Jing (a famous Chinese martial arts skill).
|
|
|
2008-10-5 03:26 |
|
