|
0451lym
高级用户
   
积分 760
发帖 357
注册 2005-10-10
状态 离线
|
『第 46 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
一块硬盘6个分区?
我的也是一块硬盘6个分区!
难道是多分区会出错?
One hard drive with 6 partitions?
Mine is also one hard drive with 6 partitions!
Could it be that having multiple partitions causes errors?
|
|
2007-4-18 09:15 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 47 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by 0451lym at 2007-4-18 09:15 AM:
一块硬盘6个分区?
我的也是一块硬盘6个分区!
难道是多分区会出错?
跟分区多少没有关系,现在估计是因为程序读取硬盘参数时出的问题,不读参数就没问题.不知道什么原因?
现在大部分人没有问题, 有个别人出问题,我再查一下相关资料...
Originally posted by 0451lym at 2007-4-18 09:15 AM:
One hard drive with six partitions?
Mine is also one hard drive with six partitions!
Could it be that having multiple partitions causes errors?
It has nothing to do with the number of partitions. Now it is estimated that it is a problem with the program reading the hard drive parameters. There is no problem if you don't read the parameters. I don't know the reason?
Now most people have no problem, there are individual people with problems, I will check relevant information...
|
|
2007-4-18 09:36 |
|
|
lianjiang2004
金牌会员
     
积分 3946
发帖 1884
注册 2006-1-20
状态 离线
|
|
2007-4-18 09:41 |
|
|
terse
银牌会员
    
积分 2404
发帖 946
注册 2005-9-8
状态 离线
|
『第 49 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
终于成功和GHOST结合
U盘启动DOS U盘被认为第一硬盘!
成功备份 第二硬盘第一分区 也就是原硬盘的C:(是NTFS:加载IFS后TODISK认到G: 然后自动备份到第二硬盘第三分区 也就是原硬盘的E (是NTFS:加载IFS后TODISK认到H:) 说明:我用的格式是X:Y P处理TODISK信息的!
成功恢复 环境同上 把刚才的第二硬盘第三分区 也就是原硬盘的E盘的GHO文件恢复到第二硬盘第一分区 也就是原硬盘的C 期间自动搜索GHO文件 自动确认恢复!
不过现在还有一些问题需要处理,刚才是在U盘目录下处理的!
想在虚拟内存盘里操作 但不知 什么原因解压文件成功后 总是跳转不了我的一个P处理文件!(我想这个问题不是主要的 呆会加上CD看看)
TODISK的成功转换DOS下的NTFS盘符问题得以解决! 是好多人梦寐以求的吧!再次衷心感谢GOTOmsdos的辛勤制作!谢了!
Finally successfully combined with GHOST
USB flash drive booting DOS USB flash drive is considered the first hard drive!
Successfully backed up the second hard drive's first partition, which is the original hard drive's C: (it's NTFS: after loading IFS, TODISK recognizes it as G: and then automatically backs up to the second hard drive's third partition, which is the original hard drive's E: (it's NTFS: after loading IFS, TODISK recognizes it as H:) Description: The format I used is X:Y, P processes the TODISK information!
Successfully restored, the environment is the same as above, restore the just-mentioned GHO file from the second hard drive's third partition, which is the original hard drive's E drive, to the second hard drive's first partition, which is the original hard drive's C. During this period, it automatically searches for the GHO file and automatically confirms the restoration!
But there are still some problems that need to be dealt with now. Just now, it was processed in the USB flash drive directory!
I want to operate in the virtual memory disk, but I don't know what the reason is. After the file is successfully extracted, it always can't jump to one of my P processing files! (I think this problem is not the main one, I'll add CD later)
The problem of TODISK successfully converting NTFS drive letters under DOS has been solved! It's what many people have been longing for! Once again, I sincerely thank GOTOmsdos for the hard work! Thanks!
|
|
2007-4-18 10:24 |
|
|
llztt1
中级用户
  
积分 214
发帖 94
注册 2007-1-11
状态 离线
|
『第 50 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
测试不读参数版本,如果我分区多过6个,第7个开始就不能加载盘符了,再加参数-IFS就更乱套了,所以,期待修正
Test the version that doesn't read parameters. If I have more than 6 partitions, the 7th and subsequent ones can't load drive letters. Adding the -IFS parameter makes it even more messed up, so looking forward to a fix
|
|
2007-4-18 11:25 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 51 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by llztt1 at 2007-4-18 11:25 AM:
测试不读参数版本,如果我分区多过6个,第7个开始就不能加载盘符了,再加参数-IFS就更乱套了,所以,期待修正
请试一试首帖最新版, 先前的版本只能识别第一硬盘...
正常版和变通版在这方面也没有区别,仅有的区别是读不读硬盘参数,不是主要的
分区多少确实没有关系, 我这里总共40个分区,都没问题
(总共可以有100个分区,也可以再增加...)
你是不能读第二硬盘,还是不能显示第二硬盘的盘符?
Originally posted by llztt1 at 2007-4-18 11:25 AM:
Test the version that does not read parameters. If I have more than 6 partitions, the drives from the 7th one cannot be loaded. Adding the parameter -IFS makes it even more chaotic. So, looking forward to the fix
Please try the latest version in the first post. The previous version could only recognize the first hard disk...
There is no difference between the normal version and the workaround version in this regard. The only difference is whether it reads the hard disk parameters, which is not the main point
The number of partitions does not really matter. Here, I have a total of 40 partitions, all working fine
(There can be a total of 100 partitions, and more can be added...)
Do you have trouble reading the second hard disk or displaying the drive letters of the second hard disk?
|
|
2007-4-18 11:58 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 52 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
TODISK的成功转换DOS下的NTFS盘符问题得以解决!
加载NTFSPRO/IFS后,DOS和GHOST本来就可以用NTFS盘符了啊?
为什么还要转换呢?
The problem of successfully converting the NTFS drive letter under DOS with TODISK has been solved!
After loading NTFSPRO/IFS, DOS and GHOST can already use NTFS drive letters?
Why is there still a need for conversion?
|
|
2007-4-18 12:01 |
|
|
llztt1
中级用户
  
积分 214
发帖 94
注册 2007-1-11
状态 离线
|
『第 53 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by GOTOmsdos at 2007-4-17 11:01 PM:
加载NTFSPRO/IFS后,DOS和GHOST本来就可以用NTFS盘符了啊?
为什么还要转换呢?
一般情况下,无论是手动查找还是批处理搜索得到的GHO文件都是盘符\路径\文件.gho格式的,如果是NTFS的话,为了稳定先退出NTFSPRO或IFS,然后GHOST命令行需要X:Y\路径\文件.GHO格式,所以这中间需要转换盘符为X:Y
用了最新版测试测试结果如下:
No. DR P P N : A ID H FILE SYSTEM LABEL START TOTAL MB
1> * 1 *07 HPFS/NTFS 63 4096512 2000
2 07 HPFS/NTFS 4096638 1638567 800
3 83 Linux Native 5735268 401562 196
* 4 1 C: 0B FAT32 NO NAME 6345675 1220940 596
* 5 06 FAT16(>=32M) NO NAME 7566615 401625 196
2> * 1 07 HPFS/NTFS 63 1024065 500
* 2 2 D: 0B FAT32 NO NAME 1024128 1024128 500
3 17* HPFS/NTFS 2048319 205569 100
4 07 HPFS/NTFS 2253951 181377 88
5 3 E: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2435391 32193 15
6 4 F: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2467647 40257 19
7 07 HPFS/NTFS 2507967 60417 29
8 5 G: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2568447 20097 9
9 6 H: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2588607 28161 13
*10 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2661120 205632 100
可以看到最后一个盘符没有被显示,而实际上是存在的,如果再加-IFS参数,就更乱了
Originally posted by GOTOmsdos at 2007-4-17 11:01 PM:
After loading NTFSPRO/IFS, DOS and GHOST can already use NTFS drive letters?
Why convert then?
Under normal circumstances, whether manually found or batch - searched, the GHO files are in the format of drive letter\path\file.gho. If it is NTFS, to be stable, exit NTFSPRO or IFS first. Then the GHOST command line needs the format of X:Y\path\file.GHO. So the drive letter needs to be converted to X:Y in the middle.
The test results with the latest version are as follows:
No. DR P P N : A ID H FILE SYSTEM LABEL START TOTAL MB
1> * 1 *07 HPFS/NTFS 63 4096512 2000
2 07 HPFS/NTFS 4096638 1638567 800
3 83 Linux Native 5735268 401562 196
* 4 1 C: 0B FAT32 NO NAME 6345675 1220940 596
* 5 06 FAT16(>=32M) NO NAME 7566615 401625 196
2> * 1 07 HPFS/NTFS 63 1024065 500
* 2 2 D: 0B FAT32 NO NAME 1024128 1024128 500
3 17* HPFS/NTFS 2048319 205569 100
4 07 HPFS/NTFS 2253951 181377 88
5 3 E: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2435391 32193 15
6 4 F: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2467647 40257 19
7 07 HPFS/NTFS 2507967 60417 29
8 5 G: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2568447 20097 9
9 6 H: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2588607 28161 13
*10 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2661120 205632 100
It can be seen that the last drive letter is not displayed, but it actually exists. If the -IFS parameter is added, it is even more chaotic
|
|
2007-4-18 12:17 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 54 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by llztt1 at 2007-4-18 12:17 PM:
*10 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2661120 205632 100
可以看到最后一个盘符没有被显示,而实际上是存在的,如果再加-IFS参数,就更乱了
哈哈! 难怪...
你是不是忘了? 非第一FAT主分区, DOS 是不认的啊!
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2007-4-18 at 12:36 PM ]
Originally posted by llztt1 at 2007-4-18 12:17 PM:
*10 06 FAT16(>=32M) 2661120 205632 100
It can be seen that the last drive letter is not displayed, but it actually exists. If you add the -IFS parameter, it will be even more chaotic.
Haha! No wonder...
Did you forget? DOS does not recognize non-first FAT primary partitions!
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2007-4-18 at 12:36 PM ]
|
|
2007-4-18 12:32 |
|
|
terse
银牌会员
    
积分 2404
发帖 946
注册 2005-9-8
状态 离线
|
『第 55 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
一点浅见;也是一种奢望;
既然MINITO是精简来了;不知能否把信息显示的方式变通一下;因为用精简版,一般不会用到扇区信息吧(个人理解);比如下面这样:
c: 1:1 USBZIP-BOOT
G: 2:1 Primary NTFS Act No 1.3 GB 3.7 GB
D: 2:2 Logical FAT 32 No No 14.0 GB 6.0 GB
H: 2:3 Logical NTFS No No 899.9 MB 8.4 GB
N L Type FS Size Active Hidden Label Used Free
1:1 C
2:1 G Primary NTFS 5.0 GB Yes No 1.3 GB 3.7 GB
2:2 D Logical FAT 32 20.1 GB No No 14.0 GB 6.0 GB
2:3 H Logical NTFS 9.3 GB No No 899.9 MB 8.4 GB
2:4 E Logical FAT 32 20.1 GB No No 10.3 GB 9.8 GB
当然如果动作很大就没必要去改动了!而且是我个人想法!可以征求其他人的看法!现在已经很满足现状了!
至于第一主分区用Primary和*倒是区别不大!
Last edited by terse on 2007-4-18 at 12:53 PM ]
A little insight; also a kind of extravagant hope;
Since MINITO has been streamlined, I wonder if the way of displaying information can be changed. Because with the streamlined version, sector information is generally not used (personal understanding); for example, like the following:
c: 1:1 USBZIP-BOOT
G: 2:1 Primary NTFS Act No 1.3 GB 3.7 GB
D: 2:2 Logical FAT 32 No No 14.0 GB 6.0 GB
H: 2:3 Logical NTFS No No 899.9 MB 8.4 GB
N L Type FS Size Active Hidden Label Used Free
1:1 C
2:1 G Primary NTFS 5.0 GB Yes No 1.3 GB 3.7 GB
2:2 D Logical FAT 32 20.1 GB No No 14.0 GB 6.0 GB
2:3 H Logical NTFS 9.3 GB No No 899.9 MB 8.4 GB
2:4 E Logical FAT 32 20.1 GB No No 10.3 GB 9.8 GB
Of course, if the action is very big, there is no need to change it! And it's my personal idea! We can solicit the opinions of others! Now I'm already very satisfied with the current situation!
As for the first primary partition, the difference between Primary and * is not big!
Last edited by terse on 2007-4-18 at 12:53 PM ]
|
|
2007-4-18 12:51 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 56 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
恩,这个有道理
没问题, 改一下,小意思...
实际就是把编号/扇区信息换成PRIMARY/LOGICAL和剩余空间..
Well, that makes sense. No problem, make a change, it's a piece of cake... Actually, it's just to replace the number/sector information with PRIMARY/LOGICAL and the remaining space..
|
|
2007-4-18 13:04 |
|
|
terse
银牌会员
    
积分 2404
发帖 946
注册 2005-9-8
状态 离线
|
『第 57 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by GOTOmsdos at 2007-4-18 13:04:
恩,这个有道理
没问题, 改一下,小意思...
实际就是把编号/扇区信息换成PRIMARY/LOGICAL和剩余空间..
万分感谢!也十分感动!再次的难为你一下!
你看TODISK -D 的显示可以和GDISK的显示方式雷同一下呢?
Disk Partitions Cylinders Heads Sectors Mbytes Model
1 1 503 16 32 125.8 UNKNOWN
2 6 9729 255 63 76319.1 UNKNOWN
对比一下 GDISK的Partitions 显示的是每个盘有几个分区的差别 其他应该差不多吧,
其实TODISK -D是否可以把 >这几个符号去掉也就一样呢?(我不知这符号的作用,是否是为了显得更明了一些呢?)
Last edited by terse on 2007-4-18 at 02:24 PM ]
Originally posted by GOTOmsdos at 2007-4-18 13:04:
Well, that makes sense
No problem, let's make the change, it's a piece of cake...
Actually, it's just replacing the number/sector information with PRIMARY/LOGICAL and the remaining space..
Many thanks! Also very touched! Once again, I'm bothering you!
Can you see if the display of TODISK -D can be similar to the display mode of GDISK?
Disk Partitions Cylinders Heads Sectors Mbytes Model
1 1 503 16 32 125.8 UNKNOWN
2 6 9729 255 63 76319.1 UNKNOWN
Compare it. The Partitions display of GDISK shows the difference of how many partitions each disk has. The others should be similar, right?
Actually, can TODISK -D remove the > these symbols? I don't know the function of these symbols. Are they to make it more clear? (I don't know the function of these symbols, is it to make it more clear?)
Last edited by terse on 2007-4-18 at 02:24 PM ]
|
|
2007-4-18 14:22 |
|
|
lianjiang2004
金牌会员
     
积分 3946
发帖 1884
注册 2006-1-20
状态 离线
|
『第 58 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
用首帖最新版的测试结果一样,minito死机,minito- 可以。
The test results are the same as the latest version of the first post. minito crashes, but minito- is okay.
|

Windows 一键还原
http://www.yjhy.com |
|
2007-4-18 21:07 |
|
|
llztt
中级用户
  
积分 204
发帖 44
注册 2003-8-8
状态 离线
|
『第 59 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
Originally posted by GOTOmsdos at 2007-4-18 12:32 PM:
哈哈! 难怪...
你是不是忘了? 非第一FAT主分区, DOS 是不认的啊!
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2007-4-18 at 12:36 PM ]
DOS不认非第一FAT主分区,这个我不知道怎么理解,因为我在DOS下正常访问2个主分区,如下:
这是DRVTYPES的结果,C盘和K盘是第二主分区和第四主分区,FAT32格式,DOS下可直接访问(第一主分区是NTFS,加载IFS后可访问)
A: Removable Drive
B: Removable Drive
C: Fixed Drive
D: Fixed Drive
E: Fixed Drive
F: Fixed Drive
G: Fixed Drive
H: Fixed Drive
I: Fixed Drive
J: Fixed Drive
K: Fixed Drive
Z: RAM Drive
下面是MINITO变通版结果
No. DR P P N : A ID H FILE SYSTEM LABEL START TOTAL MB
1> * 1 *07 HPFS/NTFS 63 5124672 2502
* 2 1 C: 0B FAT32 NO NAME 5124735 208845 101
3 2 D: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5333643 96327 47
4 3 E: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5430033 64197 31
5 4 F: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5494293 48132 23
6 5 G: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5542488 16002 7
7 6 H: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5558553 16002 7
8 7 I: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5574618 16002 7
9 8 J: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5590683 48132 23
*10 0B FAT32 NO NAME 5638815 1028160 502
可以看到K盘没有显示出来
(我换了虚拟机不要和我以前发的信息做比较)
Originally posted by GOTOmsdos at 2007-4-18 12:32 PM:
Haha! No wonder...
Did you forget? DOS doesn't recognize non-first FAT primary partitions!
Last edited by GOTOmsdos on 2007-4-18 at 12:36 PM ]
I don't know how to understand that DOS doesn't recognize non-first FAT primary partitions, because I can normally access 2 primary partitions under DOS, as follows:
This is the result of DRVTYPES, where drive C and drive K are the second primary partition and the fourth primary partition, in FAT32 format, and can be directly accessed under DOS (the first primary partition is NTFS, which can be accessed after loading IFS)
A: Removable Drive
B: Removable Drive
C: Fixed Drive
D: Fixed Drive
E: Fixed Drive
F: Fixed Drive
G: Fixed Drive
H: Fixed Drive
I: Fixed Drive
J: Fixed Drive
K: Fixed Drive
Z: RAM Drive
The following is the result of the MINITO modified version
No. DR P P N : A ID H FILE SYSTEM LABEL START TOTAL MB
1> * 1 *07 HPFS/NTFS 63 5124672 2502
* 2 1 C: 0B FAT32 NO NAME 5124735 208845 101
3 2 D: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5333643 96327 47
4 3 E: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5430033 64197 31
5 4 F: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5494293 48132 23
6 5 G: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5542488 16002 7
7 6 H: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5558553 16002 7
8 7 I: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5574618 16002 7
9 8 J: 06 FAT16(>=32M) 5590683 48132 23
*10 0B FAT32 NO NAME 5638815 1028160 502
It can be seen that drive K is not displayed
(I changed the virtual machine, don't compare with my previous information)
|
|
2007-4-18 21:46 |
|
|
GOTOmsdos
铂金会员
       C++启程者
积分 5154
发帖 1827
注册 2003-7-18
状态 离线
|
『第 60 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
你看TODISK -D 的显示可以和GDISK的显示方式雷同一下呢?
没问题, 就按照你的定做...
Can the display of TODISK -D be made similar to the display method of GDISK?
No problem, just customize it according to your requirements...
|
|
2007-4-18 22:03 |
|