中国DOS联盟

Originally posted by fastslz at 2006-10-12 12:01:
Although I didn't test your spdos, I found that there is a problem with gsldr. I'm sure that if you modify that gsldr, it is very likely not to boot on an NTFS formatted drive.

Last edited by fastslz on 2006-10-12 ...

I'm not sure about this either. It was modified with UE. The purpose is to not conflict with the existing GRLDR.
But I also want to compile my own GRLDR. Unfortunately, I don't have a computer myself. This spdos also has its own hard work. After all, the 10kb WBAT menu is not copied, and there have been more than a hundred tests before and after. It's worth a try. The reason for using the \DOS\SYS path is for easy portability. I've come a long way from 98 three years ago. Hehe, there's a shadow of booting into win98.

Oh, I won't dampen your confidence, right? :D
Hehe... Just like me, I have a self-made bootable disk with a total of 95 BAT files, 101KB, and it's the result of six to seven years of hard work and practical experience.
Modifying GRLDR with UE is not easy. It is recommended that you convert the C drive to NTFS for testing. Maybe you will find the problem with gsldr... If there is any small flaw in the released work, users won't care about how the original author wrote it and will think your work is bad. Now the NTFS format is widespread, and your gsldr problem should be resolved as soon as possible; otherwise, it's better to use the original GRLDR.