|
ytze
新手上路

积分 17
发帖 10
注册 2006-5-24
状态 离线
|
『第 16 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
晕,还有人争这个,偶五笔拼音都用,甚至数字输入法也常用,我一分钟就只打七八十个字,我知足了,我又不当打字员,信手抓来就用。
不过,不同意楼主的说法,各种输入法都有自身的优点主缺点,就好像拼音输入法输入生僻字时有时翻得头晕一样。~0~
Oh, there are still people arguing about this. I use both Wubi and Pinyin, and even often use number input methods. I can only type 70 or 80 characters per minute, and I'm content. I'm not a typist, I just use whatever comes to hand.
But I don't agree with the LZ's statement. Various input methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Just like when using Pinyin input method to type rare characters, sometimes it makes you dizzy. ~0~
|
|
2006-5-26 14:19 |
|
|
chineselgs
高级用户
    论坛灌水专业户
积分 613
发帖 266
注册 2006-4-19 来自 河南省
状态 离线
|
『第 17 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
没意思
|

饮马恒河畔,剑指天山西,碎叶城揽月,库叶岛赏雪,黑海之滨垂钓,贝尔加湖面张弓;中南半岛访古,东京废墟祭祖!
|
|
2006-5-27 01:13 |
|
|
lh2188
初级用户
 
积分 20
发帖 10
注册 2006-5-30
状态 离线
|
『第 18 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我用五笔6年了,我当初学五笔只花了一个星期。
我的普通话说得不标准,不用五笔不行。
I have been using Wubi (a Chinese input method) for 6 years. I only spent one week learning Wubi back then. My Mandarin is not standard, so I can't do without Wubi.
|
|
2006-5-30 08:27 |
|
|
cn_archer
元老会员
         农民
积分 2903
发帖 991
注册 2003-7-23 来自 福建省
状态 离线
|
『第 19 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
写这篇文章的人肯定是枪手,或是一个没有任何毅力的人。
努力一点的人,一个月基本上就可以很熟练地使用五笔输入法打字了。五笔输入法熟练之后,速度比起拼音快多了。
可以肯定,作者没有认真地花过时间练五笔。
五笔当时之所以能一统天下,是因为当时没有任何一种输入法的效率有五笔高。作者列举的种种紫光、智能狂拼,当时不知道在哪里。
其次,五笔除了单字重码率低外,在输入词组方面也毫不逊色。当年的王码五笔词组量确实不大,我也弃用了很多年。但现在多的是优秀的五笔输入法。比如说,极点五笔。可以肯定地说,作者一定也未曾用过或听说过新的五笔输入法。
再次,倘若是日常对话聊天,任何一种输入法都无所谓。但是,如果是打不同的公文、论文或其他的商业信函,拼音的效率与五笔相比,还是有差距的。
对于个人来说,只要能适用的输入法,就是好的输入法。不管是五笔,还是拼音,都是一种手段。爱用五笔就用五笔,想用拼音就用拼音,这是个人的自由。
但是,没有必要鼓吹拼音而诋毁五笔,何必呢?
The person who wrote this article must be a ghostwriter or someone with no perseverance at all.
People who work a bit harder can basically be very proficient in typing with the Wubi input method within a month. After being proficient in Wubi, the speed is much faster than that of Pinyin.
It can be affirmed that the author did not seriously spend time practicing Wubi.
The reason why Wubi dominated the world back then was that no other input method had a higher efficiency than Wubi at that time. The kinds of Purple Light, Smart Qiangpin mentioned by the author didn't even know where they were back then.
Secondly, apart from having a low single-character repetition rate, Wubi is also no inferior in inputting word groups. The number of word groups in Wangma Wubi back then was indeed not large, and I also abandoned it for many years. But now there are many excellent Wubi input methods. For example, Jidian Wubi. It can be definitely said that the author must have never used or heard of new Wubi input methods.
Thirdly, if it is daily conversation and chatting, any input method is okay. But if it is typing different official documents, papers or other business letters, the efficiency of Pinyin is still inferior to that of Wubi.
For individuals, as long as the input method is applicable, it is a good input method. Whether it is Wubi or Pinyin, it is just a means. If you like to use Wubi, use Wubi; if you want to use Pinyin, use Pinyin. It is a personal freedom. But there is no need to advocate Pinyin and denigrate Wubi. Why bother?
|

艰难奋长戟,万古用一夫
中国DOS联盟 http://www.cn-dos.net 欢迎大家来共同学习
我的MSN&E-Mail cn_archer@hotmail.com QQ 56049418
|
|
2006-5-30 11:45 |
|
|
gwlok
中级用户
   DOS爱好者
积分 213
发帖 99
注册 2006-3-26
状态 离线
|
『第 20 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我就用五笔要是没有五笔我就不会打字了因俺拼音实在是不行
I only use Wubi input method. If there were no Wubi, I wouldn't be able to type because my pinyin is really not good.
|
|
2006-6-2 12:54 |
|
|
ppshow
初级用户
 
积分 128
发帖 47
注册 2005-11-19
状态 离线
|
|
2006-6-2 23:30 |
|