|
LK
高级用户
   
积分 915
发帖 309
注册 2002-12-22
状态 离线
|
|
2003-5-3 00:00 |
|
|
Dark-Destroy
元老会员
        
积分 8312
发帖 3551
注册 2003-3-22
状态 离线
|
|
2003-5-3 00:00 |
|
|
如是大师
元老会员
         步行的人
积分 9654
发帖 3351
注册 2003-3-11 来自 湖北
状态 离线
|
『第 3 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
哦意简言骇,引人浮想连编。。。。。。。。
Oh, concise yet impactful, evoking endless reverie......
|

弄花香满衣,掬水月在手。
明月鹭鸟飞, 芦花白马走。
我自一过后,野渡现横舟。
青云碧空在,净瓶水不流。
http://dos.e-stone.cn/guestbook/index.asp
======中國DOS聯盟=====
我的新网页http://rsds.7i24.com欢迎光顾 |
|
2003-5-3 00:00 |
|
|
Dark-Destroy
元老会员
        
积分 8312
发帖 3551
注册 2003-3-22
状态 离线
|
『第 4 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
那就是你想太多了~
That is, you're overthinking it.
|

MSN:tiqit2@hotmail.com
 |
|
2003-5-3 00:00 |
|
|
tanglu_sd
高级用户
   
积分 948
发帖 271
注册 2002-12-13 来自 sd
状态 离线
|
『第 5 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
我没有用过,能简单的说说吗?
I haven't used it. Can you briefly talk about it?
|
|
2003-5-3 00:00 |
|
|
yiyesong
元老会员
        
积分 1987
发帖 632
注册 2002-10-27
状态 离线
|
『第 6 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
对普通人而言,却是不错,而对电脑高手而言,WINDOWS越往后发展,越不爽,因为其太臃肿了。
For ordinary people, it's quite good, but for computer experts, the more Windows develops later, the more unpleasant it is, because it's too bloated.
|

http://dos.e-stone.cn/dosbbs
uploadImages/200311161145850422.swf
|
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
如是大师
元老会员
         步行的人
积分 9654
发帖 3351
注册 2003-3-11 来自 湖北
状态 离线
|
『第 7 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
是啊,所以要用dos。以后的win藏的太深,又不见大的长进。。。
Yeah, so we need to use DOS. The later Windows is too deep-seated and doesn't have big improvements...
|

弄花香满衣,掬水月在手。
明月鹭鸟飞, 芦花白马走。
我自一过后,野渡现横舟。
青云碧空在,净瓶水不流。
http://dos.e-stone.cn/guestbook/index.asp
======中國DOS聯盟=====
我的新网页http://rsds.7i24.com欢迎光顾 |
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
Dark-Destroy
元老会员
        
积分 8312
发帖 3551
注册 2003-3-22
状态 离线
|
『第 8 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
沒辦法,過度圖型化的後果就是如此~
There's no way, this is the consequence of excessive graphical - rendering~
|

MSN:tiqit2@hotmail.com
 |
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
LK
高级用户
   
积分 915
发帖 309
注册 2002-12-22
状态 离线
|
『第 9 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
唉!许多人也不去实验一下,说话就凭想象,真是悲哀......
我只说一点:我是冲着win2003的net构架而安装的,原来我是用win98,要进入此论坛就常常十有八九打不开,可用win2003就没有一次打不开,而且还很快,这岂不是爽是什么?
Alas! Many people don't even try it out, they just speak based on imagination. It's really sad...
I'll just say one thing: I installed it for the sake of the win2003 net framework. Originally, I was using win98, and when entering this forum, it often couldn't open nine times out of ten. But with win2003, it's never failed to open, and it's also very fast. Isn't this great?
|
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
nre
银牌会员
     nre
积分 1210
发帖 361
注册 2002-12-28
状态 离线
|
『第 10 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
以下是引用LK在2003-5-4 9:26:46的发言:
唉!许多人也不去实验一下,说话就凭想象,真是悲哀......
我只说一点:我是冲着win2003的net构架而安装的,原来我是用win98,要进入此论坛就常常十有八九打不开,可用win2003就没有一次打不开,而且还很快,这岂不是爽是什么?
你根据什么就认定,打开此论坛成功率高和速度快 一定是所谓。NET构架的功劳
The following is a quote from LK on 2003-5-4 9:26:46:
Alas! Many people don't go to experiment, just speak based on imagination, really sad......
I just say one point: I installed it for the sake of the net framework of win2003. Originally I used win98, to enter this forum often there were nine times out of ten unable to open, but with win2003 there was not once unable to open, and also very fast, this is not refreshing what?
What basis do you have to be convinced that the higher success rate and faster speed of opening this forum must be the credit of the so-called.NET framework
|

Teamwork ! |
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
LK
高级用户
   
积分 915
发帖 309
注册 2002-12-22
状态 离线
|
『第 11 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
这位老兄问的好!我的确没有什么手段来确定(我还没到那个水平),net构架之速度快一说是其简介所“吹”的,我是冲其“吹”而来的(我想这样纠正一下较为事实些了)!
在我处打开此论坛很困难,打开此论坛成功率和速度已成了我试验一些提速软件的方法,速度快是我从两个系统比较而来(win98仍然保留),而且并不能说明别人的也就肯定行。
我觉得发展DOS却不应否定WINDOWS,而且DOS有很强的诱惑力,WINDOWS也同样有。
This fellow asked a good question! I really don't have any means to determine (I'm not at that level yet). The claim that the speed of the.NET framework is fast is what its introduction "brags" about, and I came for it because of that "brag" (I think correcting it like this is more factual)!
It's very difficult to open this forum in my place. The success rate and speed of opening this forum have become a way for me to test some speed-up software. The speed is what I compared from two systems (win98 is still kept), and it can't be said that others' will definitely work.
I think developing DOS should not deny WINDOWS, and DOS has a strong allure, and WINDOWS also has.
|
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
nre
银牌会员
     nre
积分 1210
发帖 361
注册 2002-12-28
状态 离线
|
『第 12 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
“两个系统比较而来”
如果比较必须环境相同。同样的接入方式,同样的时间,IE版本相同,挂齐补丁,这样比较结果才能让人信服。
"Comparative result of two systems"
If comparison must be under the same environment. The same access method, the same time, the same version of IE, all patches installed, only then the comparison result can be convincing.
|

Teamwork ! |
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
LK
高级用户
   
积分 915
发帖 309
注册 2002-12-22
状态 离线
|
『第 13 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
够意思!不过您也可以试验的,要知道我可是个菜鸟呀,我尽量回答您的问题,您也不要烦我啊?
1.环境相同是指硬件环境么?不知同一机器的双系统是否满足?
2.同样的接入方式是指上网连接方式吗?我一直是在本公司的局域网。
3.同样的时间?我要重新启动才能够进入另一系统,不知道这点时间差异算不算不同样?
4.win98的IE版本为6.0.2600, win2003的IE版本为6.0.3790.0,我可没法搞成“相同”的,况且两系统本来就不同。
5.挂齐补丁是指windows update么?若是,我想我还是能办到了的。
抱歉!不知我是否理解正确?
That's thoughtful! But you can also experiment. You know I'm a newbie呀, I'll try my best to answer your questions, and don't be annoyed with me, okay?
1. Does "same environment" refer to hardware environment? I wonder if dual systems on the same machine meet the requirement?
2. Does "same access method" refer to the Internet connection method? I've always been on my company's LAN.
3. Same time? I need to restart to enter another system. I don't know if this time difference counts as different.
4. The IE version of Win98 is 6.0.2600, and the IE version of Win2003 is 6.0.3790.0. I can't make them "same", and besides, the two systems are originally different.
5. Does "install all patches" refer to Windows Update? If so, I think I can do it.
Sorry! I don't know if I understand correctly?
|
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
nre
银牌会员
     nre
积分 1210
发帖 361
注册 2002-12-28
状态 离线
|
『第 14 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
以下是引用LK在2003-5-4 14:19:59的发言:
够意思!不过您也可以试验的,要知道我可是个菜鸟呀,我尽量回答您的问题,您也不要烦我啊?
1.环境相同是指硬件环境么?不知同一机器的双系统是否满足?
2.同样的接入方式是指上网连接方式吗?我一直是在本公司的局域网。
3.同样的时间?我要重新启动才能够进入另一系统,不知道这点时间差异算不算不同样?
4.win98的IE版本为6.0.2600, win2003的IE版本为6.0.3790.0,我可没法搞成“相同”的,况且两系统本来就不同。
5.挂齐补丁是指windows update么?若是,我想我还是能办到了的。
抱歉!不知我是否理解正确?
那这么说就是不可能咯。那也就别说是2003好了。在没保证环境相同的情况下,你所谓的快无法得到证明的。
The following is a quote from LK on 2003-5-4 14:19:59:
That's considerate! But you can also experiment. You know I'm just a newbie. I'll try my best to answer your questions. Don't be annoyed with me, okay?
1. Does the same environment refer to the hardware environment? I wonder if dual systems on the same machine meet the requirement?
2. The same access method refers to the Internet connection method? I've always been in the LAN of my company.
3. The same time? I need to restart to enter another system. I don't know if this time difference counts as different?
4. The IE version of win98 is 6.0.2600, and the IE version of win2003 is 6.0.3790.0. I can't make them "the same", and besides, the two systems are originally different.
5. Hanging up all patches refers to windows update? If so, I think I can do it.
Sorry! I don't know if I understand correctly?
Then that means it's impossible. Then don't even talk about 2003. Without ensuring the same environment, the speed you mentioned can't be proved.
|

Teamwork ! |
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|
|
playboy2925
银牌会员
     想當一人之下萬人之上
积分 1275
发帖 393
注册 2003-1-10
状态 离线
|
『第 15 楼』:
使用 LLM 解释/回答一下
可以给我发张盘吗????
我们现在封校,什么也买不到。
Can you send me a disk??? We are on campus lockdown now and can't buy anything.
|

<- 刷新一下换个MM
叫我Jorkin或小p就行,别再叫playboy2925了,跟提犯人似的。
如果认为小弟发的logo不错的话,给朵鲜花我就知道了。:)
|
|
2003-5-4 00:00 |
|